Note: The VIRUS as the smokescreen!
Tag Archives: France
Lyn Thyer update 7 Jun 2019
Extradition challenged in common law court, so delayed/on hold for now. Judge Michael Supperstone issued a ruling in favour of the corrupt extradition in writing several days after the court hearing.
To support David Noakes and Lynda Thyer we are asking people to telephone or e-mail the Supreme Court, London and to ask them when the court hearing will be held for the challenge to their authority and jurisdiction and ask them why they are failing to respond to a lawfully issued challenge.
Mark for the attention of the Registrar
The Case No. CO/1839/2018
67th Bilderberg: 30 May – 2 June 2019 in Montreux, Switzerland
Just a note for archival purposes of this event and its attendees. I may post opinions on the topics in later posts.
The key [public] topics for discussion this year are:
1. A Stable Strategic Order
2. What Next for Europe?
3. Climate Change and Sustainability
4. China (Ed note: faux enemy)
5. Russia (Ed note: faux enemy)
6. The Future of Capitalism
8. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
9. The Weaponisation of Social Media (Ed note: censorship/deplatforming)
10. The Importance of Space
11. Cyber Threats
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 2019
Castries, Henri de (FRA), Chairman, Steering Committee; Chairman, Institut Montaigne
Kravis, Marie-Josée (USA), President, American Friends of Bilderberg Inc.; Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute
Halberstadt, Victor (NLD), Chairman Foundation Bilderberg Meetings; Professor of Economics, Leiden University
Achleitner, Paul M. (DEU), Treasurer Foundation Bilderberg Meetings; Chairman Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG
Continue reading 67th Bilderberg: 30 May – 2 June 2019 in Montreux, Switzerland
Lyn Thyer Update
Lyn was due to be extradited today 22nd May 2019…Ian Crane will update her supporters via twitter or his youtube channel.
Take note of the corrupt acts between state (UK/France), legal and medical professions in support of pharma corporations profit stream. Visible and overt corruption!
Update On LYN THYER’s Appeal Against EXTRADITION to FRANCE
Good news, she is still free
Lyn Thyer Extradition Hearing @Royal Court of Justice(?) – Part 2
Lyn Thyer Extradition Hearing Part 2
The Royal Courts of Justice
10AM Thursday 28th March 2019
The Strand, London WC2A 2LL
“The British CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) could NOT find any justifiable reason to bring charges against Lyn…the french equivalent of MHRA decided they would attempt to extradite Lyn”
Lyn Thyer (biochemist) is facing extradition by Le Cleiss (the French equivalent of the MHRA)
Links to related articles:
LYN THYER (GCMAF) EXTRADITION HEARING
10,000 troops from 13 countries arrive in the UK for major exercise
Published 14 March 2019
The UK will boost its defensive capabilities by hosting a major international military exercise for two weeks from 30 March 2019.
More than 10,000 military personnel, 35 warships, 5 submarines and 59 aircraft and helicopters from 13 countries will take part in Exercise Joint Warrior until 11 April.
The aim of Joint Warrior is to allow the UK’s Royal Navy, Army, Royal Air Force and their allies to conduct joint operations involving different forces and units and against a range of current and future threats
There following nations are taking part in Exercise Joint Warrior: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, the UK and the US.
“On operation yellowhammer, which is the emergency planning for a no-deal Brexit, it is beyond comprehension that any Prime Minister could knowingly allow the country to be eight days—about 200 hours—away from the possibility of crashing out of the European Union without a deal and to require that emergency planning work to be done”
– The First Minister (Nicola Sturgeon) on Yellowhammer
The question I have is: Why commit 10,000 troops during a key period of political change?
We should be leaving the EU at 11pm on Friday 29th and yet we have 10,000 troops in an exercise (cover) from 30th March to 11th April (two weeks)! As UK column pointed out, best to have foreign troops if you need to forcefully crack down on UK populace.
Would you want foreign troops diverting military resources during your contingency planning? Incompetence, over-confidence or worst case planning for unrest?
Western Liars and their “Chemical Weapons” deceit
The Right Honorable Theresa May and Boris Johnson did not provide their evidence for the nerve agent debacle in Salisbury, near Porto Down. It was in line with previous lies about Russian interference in elections. The new lie, is that Bashar al-Assad’s government used chemical weapons.
Does Assad benefit from using chemical weapons knowing the West will use it as justification for further intervention? No!
Will the US/UK/Israel/NATO stage “violent acts” to further an agenda? Yes is the answer! The most brazen being 911. We have seen multiple staged events in the UK and European mainland since then.
Lies and deceit amongst the corporate, political and military leadership in the West can be taken as axiomatic. To profess a value whilst doing the exact opposite. What did we see in the movie Black Panther? An advanced nation sharing its technology and seeking to correct historical mistakes. A direct inversion of the reality of the US, UK, Australia and NATO members.
We can take the West’s humanitarian concern for chemical weapons use, as purely a ploy, a deceit to further their and Israel’s agenda. It is a transparent deceit once you know the “western leadership” cadre are pretentious concerning the “rule of law”.
We know the West (including Israel) has the inclination, history and motive to stage “terrorists acts” that further their supremacy, so claiming a chemical attack happened is a convenient excuse to coerce public support and project a false moral concern for Syrian citizens.
Reader you will recall the US used Depleted Uranium armaments in Iraq. A hazard to both its own troops and the local population. Does the long term “chemical poisoning” of the land and air by DU weapons concern these Western hypocrites? How about Israel’s continued brutish and genocidal behavior in Gaza? How has intervention and regime change worked out in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya?
I have a few questions whenever I hear about these “humanitarian interventions”: How are these leaders concerned for their own citizens? What are the social conditions for the working class? Does the “humanitarian intervention” provide cover for corporate or geopolitical interests?
The Rt Hon. Theresa May and Boris Johnson fail miserably concerning the well being of the working class and poor in the UK. A festering example? Nine months after the fire, only 70 of 211 Grenfell families have moved into permanent housing, prompting complaints of apathy and incompetence by the local council
Ministers will face a backlash against reform to the benefits system when millions of claimants moving on to universal credit realise their income will be cut, the government’s most senior welfare adviser has warned
Do we need to comment on how well the bottom 50% of Americans are doing? How about the EU’s concern for its southern members like Greece? How about Israel’s humanitarian concern of the previous dominant inhabitants of Palestine?
We are dealing with proven liars in Trump, May, Macron and Johnson. Believe them at you own peril. It is your fault for accepting their continued deceits.
Here is a further motive: Under the pretense of an “independent” investigation into chemical weapons, intelligence workers pick military sites of interests for “close examination”. Russia has been a victim of this ploy once before. You also have to ask which countries have the expertise to lead this panel of “independent” investigators? Are these not the same countries accusing Syria?
Please dear reader, identify a single country with a proven track record of independence from western ideological supremacy? I cannot name one, so to my mind what is the basis of the “independent” investigation?
Let us state the “international community” is simply a euphemism for coerced western consensus. This blogger asserts that the UN, WHO, World Bank, NATO, BIS are mechanisms of western mind control* and exploitation.
* Yes! Mind control.They have created a fake reality that these bodies are fair, neutral, independent but actually hide very partisan/corporate interests. Let us elaborate on these mind control institutions:
UN – Deceit of international political/diplomatic governance
WHO – Western hegemony on what constitutes accepted medical practices
NATO -Public face of US lead global military dominance.
BIS/World Bank/IMF – Mechanism global financial control and authority
France: Official Election figures
I – Participation aux scrutins (périmètre : France entière)
|Nombre||% des inscrits (Of registrants)||% des votants (% Of voters)|
|Inscrits (registered)||47 568 588|
|Abstention||12 101 416||25,44%|
|Votants||35 467 172||74,56%|
||3 019 724||6,35%||8,51%|
|Nuls||1 049 532||2,21%||2,96%|
|Exprimés||31 397 916||66,01%||88,53%|
II – Résultats complets (périmètre : France entière) :
|Nombre||% des inscritsv (
% Of registrants)
|% des exprimés
|M. Emmanuel MACRON||20 753 798||43,63%||66,10%|
|Mme Marine LE PEN||10 644 118||22,38%||33,90%|
|Total||31 397 916||100%||100%|
Note: I wanted the actual percentage relative to cast votes and potential votes, not just the votes cast for Macron or Le Pen. So Le Pen and Macron accounted for 66.01% of registered voters. So ex-rothschild bankster, Globalist, EUphile, faux leftist or centrist Macron can claim 43.6% (20.7 million) of France’s registered voters! Only 8.5% (4 million) blank/void votes?
How many people in a given population have given thought to the actual mechanics of their electoral process? How many know weaknesses or points of subversion? I am amongst the ignorant however is it not surprising that the press DO NOT educate/inform the populace about the actual mechanics of the process, the boring detail? Is that not responsible citizenship?
In the UK, pencils are used to record votes. The US has electronic voting machines (a fraudsters wet dream).
Even RT failed on French Election stats
In every election since 1965 according to the above image, the “blank” vote was higher in the 2nd round. So to see figures quoted of 66% and 34% conveniently ignores abstentions and blank votes.
Typically since 1965, we see double the blank votes in the 2nd round This would generate a figure of 5.2%. If however the blank votes were significant, say 10% or more, the claim of 66% winning margin becomes even more untenable.
Once the official figures are available, I will revisit the table below.
|Number||% Of registrants||% Of voters|
|Registerered||47 581 118|