Category Archives: Articles

Lying Pro-Vaxxers

I posted a comment on this ladies blog. It was deleted!
She lies about anti-vaxxers putting out mis-information. Here is my deleted post on her blog:

Why do pro-vaxxers have to lie to win their argument.

Some many points to consider, however let’s just take a singular point The moral, ethical bankruptcy of legal immunity of the vaccine pushers (manufacturers). They claim their products are “safe” and “effective” yet they NEED legal immunity from claims for harm.
It would be interesting to know what other industry/product is immune from claims and needs a government body to assess and payout claims.
https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/index.html

In 2016 alone $252,610,672.33 was paid out. Page 8 of pdf: https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/vaccine-compensation/data/monthly-stats-march-2019.pdf

Misinformation, well this is from the Vaccine compensation body itself.

Her initial post is below:

Sometimes it takes rebellious youth to help us see the error of our ways. Consider Ethan Lindenberger, an 18-year-old from Ohio. His act of rebellion wasn’t staying out past curfew or avoiding his homework: It was getting vaccinated on his own, despite his mother’s protests. Lindenberger’s mother opted her children out of vaccines and fed […]

via What a teenager who got vaccinated against his parents’ will can teach us about anti-vaxxers — Hurn Publications

Advertisements

Looking behind the Bushes – Great moments in a great American family

Rediscovered and  posted for archival purposes. The original still exists- http://prorev.com/bush2.htm

19th century

CONSORTIUM NEWS –
In the late 19th Century, Samuel Bush moved to Ohio from Orange,
New Jersey, where he had attended the nearby Stevens Institute
of Technology in Hoboken. He made the first big move in his manufacturing
career as an engineer with Buckeye Steel Castings Company, which
produced gun barrels and railroad parts. Samuel Bush became a
confidante of the company’s president, Frank Rockefeller, a brother
of the enormously wealthy and powerful John D. Rockefeller, who
owned Standard Oil. Another participant in Buckeye Steel was
railroad baron E.H. Harriman. . .

1908

CONSORTIUM NEWS
Samuel Bush took over from Frank Rockefeller as president of
the company in 1908, and held that job for the next 20 years.
. . Samuel Bush’s Buckeye Steel made the gun barrels for Remington.
. . During World War I, Remington supplied 67 percent of all
the weapons and ammunition used by the Allied forces.

Samuel’s son, Prescott Bush, served as
an artillery liaison officer with the French forces during the
war and wrote back home about his heroic exploits in letters
that were published. But the exploits proved to be fabricated,
forcing Prescott to apologize. But that didn’t deter him – or
dim his career prospects. . .
Continue reading Looking behind the Bushes – Great moments in a great American family

Afro-futurist’s Map of the World

Afro-futurist Map of Africa2
Re-imagining Earth’s orientation. Some very interesting thought experiments arise from IMAGINATION! I wonder if this is the map Wakandans use?

Sunrise in the west and sunsets in the East.
England is in Eastern Europe (East Asian landmass). Russia is in South western Asia.
The USA is now South Americas, Brazil, Chile are part of North Americas.

The PERSON – A Fundamental deceit of the BAR Guild

Why do members of the BAR Guild continue the deceit of the fictional person?
Why do the BAR Guild members not state clearly that they wish to join the fictional PERSON,  to you (the living flesh, man/woman)?
By accepting in ignorance that you are the PERSON, you have now become a “thing”, that they can impose upon.
If lawfulness, truth and justice were the true aims of this Guild, surely their scholars would have stopped the hiding of this unwitting consent to represent the PERSON.

This deceit, it seems enables the profitable summary judgements of parking tickets, policy enforcer (police) penalties, local authority charges and county court judgements.

To the reader that thinks this is all nonsense, ask your legal expert if there is a difference between the fictional PERSON and you the living, breathing flesh in court?

Ask the judge or magistrate (politely) if by giving your name and address, you have consented to any prior assumptions, such as acting for a fictional entity bearing the same identifier (name)?

Dear reader, is that NOT fundamental? That a profession that we defer to when it comes to lawful and legal matters would initiate your interaction with this trick?

The Western Courts claim a solemn oath under “God” to arbitrate the facts and pass judgements. How can this truth under “God” be valid if it starts with a trick that assumes you are a thing, an incompetent. a ward of the court, lost goods to be warehoused (imprisoned)?

Does the fictional PERSON have any utility? To my mind it primary benefit is commercial. It is useful when dealing with other fictional entities like corporations and governments? In the same way that “money” has utility, the fictional “me”, “you”, “person” can be used to memorialize an agreement – a contract document.

So why is this lay-person so disgusted by the on-going deceit when you unwittingly consent to represent the PERSON? It is because it is hidden, enables unjust rulings and facilitates the automation of judgements for profit and convenience not law.

So what does this fundamental deceit have to do with TPP, TTIP, TISA, national and international legal immunity? Integrity, the claim of “rule of law”. If we have multiple deceits, corruptions, lies, obfuscations, we are dealing with a criminal group pretending to be lawful for power, profit and control. A legalese mafia if you like masquerading as upholders of justice and truth.

Don’t believe me? A dare you, dear reader to test the ideas and return with your comments. Let us see if my own first hand experience was an aberration!

Admiralty Law – The Pirate Parasite Bankster’s Preferred Law Form

The link between the priests of finance and law becomes clearer.

Frank O’collins must be a Russian agent as he exposes the deceits of Western Roman law and its pretensions concerning the “rule of law”.

“Admiralty law…organized pseudo legal commercial form of law…first formed in early eighteenth century…based loosely around maritime themes and mimicking all other forms of law”.

“A fraud, a deception… a means by which certain families, certain groups and people concocted a way to steal and control the world, as if the world be stupid and ignorant slaves”

Rockefeller University: Still pushing Zika Bovine Excrement

https://fssalerts.wordpress.com/2016/08/23/zika-virus-compilation-7/

PDF download
A new study shows for the first time that the Zika virus can infect the mouse adult brain in regions that are vital to learning and memory. The researchers observed that infection correlated with evidence of cell death and reduced generation of new neurons. The findings suggest that the virus could have more subtle effects than have been recognized, perhaps contributing to such conditions as long-term memory loss or depression.

Note: Don’t forget which research body originally harvested Zika from the wild. Yep Rockefeller. Hey Billy Boy, we await your Synthetic Virology department’s first candidate virus: Gatinski Haemorrhagic Virus – GHV1.

Brexit: Will the Queen betray her Trust?

A leading and inflammatory question? Yes, indeed, Brexit is that serious!

It rests on simple ideas. We are informed or rather the narrative is that the Queen is the protector of the interests of the common man in Great Britain and some commonwealth countries. She swore to this in her coronation oath:

” Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements
The Queen’s Coronation Oath 1953

We also note that the Queen leads the privy council of which the Prime Minister and his opposition are members. This acknowledes a deference to the Queen.

What happens in the following scenario:

The “sovereign” parliamentarians ignore the electorate by delays, obfuscations and rejection of the EU referendum.

In negating the will of the electorate the “sovereign” parliamentarians have relinquished their delegated right to govern.

The Queen is called on to consent to acts and statutes passed by a parliament that has lost its consent from the electorate.

The Queen can betray her stewardship and oath to ceremoniously consent or she can state that she cannot consent to “laws” brought forth by a parliament having lost its authority, goodwill and consent from the public.

Then there are the mundane and legal conceptions of Trust.chart_of_a_trust

In the diagram let us say the “government” is the Trustee, if the People are the settlors and the Queen is the protector? Has she not failed in her duty?

I would contend that a can of putrid worms will be opened should “sovereign” parliamentarians decide to betray their trust!

Please feel free to rip apart my logic, omissions, mistakes. I look forward to an interesting debate or discussion on the constitutional implications of any betrayal of the Brexit result for the UK and the Queen.

Image: Wikipedia