Category Archives: EbolaInfo

SIR Disease Model for COVID-19 (Coronavirus)

The SIR model is one of the simplest disease models we have to explain the spread of a virus through a population. I first explain where the model comes from, including the assumptions that are made and how the equations are derived, before going on to use the results of the model to answer three important questions…

Produced by Dr Tom Crawford at the University of Oxford.

Note: His honest stating of assumptions (guesses).
S = Susceptibles (a guess)
I = Infectives (another guess)
R = Removed (caught the disease. Heavily corrupted value due to NHS fraud)

Kudos for his candor unlike that liar Dr Neil Ferguson (Prof Lockdown) of UK government’s SAGE advisory group.

AI and our health data: A pandemic threat to our privacy | The Listening Post

Note: Only the first 10 minutes relates to serious privacy concerns relating to the CIA, Palantir and faculty having access to medical records of NHS (UK) patients.

Epidemiology: Science or concocted numbers?

…epidemiology studies disease within a cultural context, and is particularly concerned with social organization. Epidemiology is, therefore, not only a bio-science but also a social science. Populations exist in a physical environment which is a dominant force in determining health. The study of life in relation to the environment is ecology (the word derives from the Greek for house), so epidemiology is, in addition, the science of the ecology of disease. The science of epidemiology,therefore,combines elements of biology,social sciences, and ecology:a bio-social-environmental science focusing on disease in populations.By its nature,epidemiology is multidisciplinary.The closest partner of the epidemiologist is the statistician

Concepts of Epidemiology – Raj Bhopal

Garbage in, Garbage out. So epidemiology therefore relies on ideas, theories which are then supported with their “data”, “formulas” or statistical calculations.

“Test Track and Trace”: Another dud!

A post from WhatsApp:

The start of the “Test Track and Trace” is the test.

By now you know the test is pure BS when used as a diagnostic to identify the “virus” they claim causes COVID-19.

You call them (NHS 111) with any flu like symptoms or hay fever symptoms and they may request a test.
You get a positive result. So what?

A pawpaw tested positive for COVID-19
Test track and trace the pawpaw
Test track and trace the banana
Test track and trace the chicken nugget
Test track and trace the burger
Test track and trace the pork chop
Test track and trace the Chinese takeaway

The root, the test is rotten, suspect, consequently any actions based on it are suspect.

So we have another confirmed dud from Brexit Boris, Matt Hancock and the global medical bullshit merchants from the World health Organisation.

Challenge to the COVID-19 Medical Murderers

The title is indeed provacative but bear with me, I assert that this is exactly what is going on in some instances in the UK and US.

To prove or refute my assertion all the Medical Murderers practising euthanasia have to do is one very simple thing:

Publish the hospital treatment records of all COVID-19 deaths after seeking the consent from their next-of-kin.

All we wish to know are:

  • what medication/procedure
  • when
  • why ( symptoms promoting changes)

That’s it. Very simple. Openly publish what you did to each of these so called COVID-19 deaths.

An alternative for the privacy advocates, isa  meta analysis of these records to tabulate treatments, medications, procedures, symptoms, age and ethnicity. It should be very interesting.

CENTIVAX – Universal Vaccines

https://www.distributedbio.com/centivax

“However, rapidly mutating or naturally polymorphic pathogens of HIV, influenza, Chagas disease, sleeping sickness, Dengue and Zika continue to pose challenges to vaccine science. Our patented breakthrough epitope focusing technology, Centivax, focuses the immune response against conserved parts of pathogens that cannot mutate, enabling Universal Vaccine design

our influenza program works towards being applied to the $165M animal market and $3.2B human market, we also expand studies into other critical unmet needs, such as flaviviruses and HIV.”

The Infectious Myth – Stephen Bustin on Challenges with RT-PCR

https://infectiousmyth.podbean.com/e/the-infectious-myth-stephen-bustin-on-challenges-with-rt-pcr/

RT-PCR is the main method for declaring that someone is COVID-19 infected or not, as well as having numerous other uses in molecular biology research and biological testing. Professor Stephen Bustin is a world expert on the technology, and the potential problems with using it to produce accurate and repeatable results. Although the coronavirus test is presented as a binary test, it is actually based on whether the production of DNA is detectable prior to an arbitrary number of PCR cycles. If there is variability in the quantification, then samples will be above or below the limit, when they should not be, resulting in false positives and negatives. David and Stephen walk through the steps, from the extraction of RNA from the original sample, the conversion of the RNA to complementary DNA, and duplication of DNA using PCR, and the optional step of sequencing. While this is dense technical information at times, it is presented logically, and the limitations of this method cannot be understood without taking the cover off the black box. We suggest not listening to this episode when you are trying to do anything else, but sit down in a quiet place so that you can concentrate fully.