Tag Archives: EU Referendum

Twitter launches new search tool to combat vaccine misinformation

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/techandscience/twitter-launches-new-search-tool-to-combat-vaccine-misinformation/ar-AABnJ8H?ocid=spartanntp&MSCC=1557929295
vaccine injection-norbert millauer-afp-getty
Twitter has launched a new search tool to combat the spread of misinformation about vaccines on the social network.
Users will now be prompted to visit a credible public health resource when they search on Twitter for certain keywords related to vaccines, Twitter said in a blog post Friday. In the US, Twitter has partnered with the Department of Health and Human Services to direct users to the agency’s Vaccines.gov.
A search for the word “vaccines,” for example, generates a message at the top of users’ feeds that says “To make sure you get the best information on vaccinations, resources are available from the US Department of Health & Human Services.”
The new tool comes as tech companies face mounting pressure from lawmakers, activists and health experts to prevent anti-vax misinformation from going viral. The misinformation may have contributed to an outbreak of measles in the US.
Other tech companies have also beefed up their efforts to combat misinformation about vaccines. Facebook said in March it would demote the ranking of groups or pages that spread misinformation about vaccines on its News Feed and in search results. Pinterest blocked anti-vaccination searches and has tried to pull down anti-vax content. In February, YouTube said it would remove ads from videos that feature anti-vaccination content.

Note: Do these pro-vaxxers think this will stop criticism of vaccines? Their attempts at censorship on social media (modern book burning), simply highlight their “faith” in vaccines. Real science is NEVER afraid of criticism.

Here is a question for the pro-vaxxers and their drug pushing Big Pharma corporatists: How many vaccines is too many for a child/teenager? 50 before age 16? 100 maybe? What is the upper, sustainable limit? At what number does the toxic/foreign body load become counter-productive?

Advertisements

Walter Hallstein: Nazi Legalese practitioner and founding father of the E.U.

The “honourable” gang members of parliament are back from their Easter break, so we need to remind ourselves of the nature of the EU superstate and why their supplicant behaviour is treacherous.

Walter Hallstein was a German academic, diplomat, and politician. He was the first president of the Commission of the European Economic Community and one of the founding fathers of the European Union. – wikipedia

Walter_Hallstein-Nazi 1st president of the EU

Walter was a member of many leading Nazi organizations the most significant of
which were the National Socialists university lecturers association and the National
Socialist League for protection of the law.
These organizations cater to committed members of the Nazi Party – officially the National Socialist German Workers’ Party

Furthermore we have Walter’s ‘Conquest Speech’ given in Rostock, Germany, on 23 January 1939, of which I have some excerpts:

“The Creation of the Greater German Reich is:
A political fact, a ‘Fuehrer Act’ of Epochal Dimension;
One of those Acts that change the Landscape of History and fulfill an old Longing of the People;
An Economic Event of sheer unimaginable consequences;
An event of exceptional significance from the perspective of the History of the Law.”

“The failure to put this law into action is one of the unfinished tasks and failures of the Second German Reich.”

“The Law for the Protection of the German Blood and the German Honor

More can be found in the book The Nazi Roots of the Brussels EU

As we describe in our book, The Nazi Roots of the Brussels EU, the key architects of the so-called ‘European Union’ were recruited from among the same technocrats who had previously designed the plans for a post-WW2 Europe under the control of the Nazi/IG Farben coalition. Based on literally tens of thousands of historical documents obtained by our Foundation from international archives, the growing global awareness of the facts means that the Brussels EU “experiment” is effectively now over

http://www.reject-the-eu.co.uk/nazi-roots/chapter.html

Brexit: Jason Hunter the Hypocritical Psycopathic Remainer!

I came across one of Jason Hunter’s youtube videos. It did challenge my ideas on a no deal Brexit. I was initially keen to delve deeper into what he had to say but this particular talk on youtube showed clearly what we a dealing with: A psychopathic, smug, hypocritical EUphile.

Firstly, Jason does point out factually the pitiful inadequacy of the Rt Hon Theresa May’s cabinet and the civil service regarding Brexit. On this I have to agree with him.
The facts or allusions to them cannot be denied. There are hundreds of treaties which must be recreated. Jason mentions 750.
Jason Hunter makes no pretense at being impartial, neither do I. He wants the referendum result revoked due to fraud by leave campaigners. He even throws in Russian collusion via social media bots.
What nonsense. Any criticism of the west is classed as Russian collusion. Are the Russians persecuting Lyn Thyer or David Noakes for making GcMaf or mandating vaccines?
Back to this hypocrite, Jason Hunter. Let us use his own words to expose his motivations and psychopathy or not:

Let us contrast two statements Jason makes in this video. Concern for people losing their jobs, incomes.
@12:25

“jobs, is jobs, is jobs, its not, its households. It’s people. Real people lives, real people incomes, real peoples mortgage payments, that’s what we’re talking about”

Versus, what he did for a large steel company
@15:51

“For several years, I was head of strategic planning for a very large steel company and we’d pick another country’s industry, say an automotive and we want to sell them flat steel…
once we’ve destroyed that competitor, we have that market all to ourselves for the next 5, 10, 15 years…”

He was not concerned about “people’s” jobs or incomes when his steel employer destroyed their competitor however due to Brexit he is concerned for destroyed jobs and companies.
He accepts capital’s exploitative predation and psychopathy when they(he) is the predator but not when he or the UK are victims of that same predation.

@25:40

“The EU are pulling their hair out, we’ve got back channels over there, we talk to them regularly”

@28:00

“We’ve talked with some of the leading drug manufacturers here in the UK, we talked with GlaxoSmithKline, talked to AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson…the big four if you like and they consult with the government”

– GlaxoSmithKline (make Cervarix HPV vaccine)
– AstraZeneca UK (make Fluenz Tetra flu vaccine)
– Johnson & Johnson (researching HIV/Ebola vaccines)

He has back-channels to the EU that openly disclose confidential activity between UK government ministers and the EU. It clearly show a strange level of intimacy to my mind. From what I gather, he has negotiated “trade deals” for companies NOT nation-states, so why does he have this degree of intimate access to Brussels and pharma?

The real deceit by this man, as he positions it as a rational choice, is to “pause” Brexit by revoking Article 50! I say it is a deceit because he must know once Brexit is stopped by revoking the divorce document (article 50), the political will for Brexit evaporates. Neither party will ever initiate the Brexit process ever again!. Real Brexiteers are in the minority in parlimanent.

Jason Hunter is still worth listening to for a dose of Brexit reality. However are his views consistent with someone truly concerned for liberty, “democracy”, or rejection of capital’s priests/oligarchs and their psychopathy?

Brexit: Deal or no deal, here’s why Brexit cannot be stopped

An excellent article on the options before our pretentious political puppets concerning Brexit.
https://brexitcentral.com/deal-no-deal-heres-brexit-cannot-stopped/
Brexit Decision flow
The red boxes in the image above show the path to the default/pending outcome: No Deal. They have already rejected WA&PD!

…if the UK is still in the EU (or has BRINO) after 29th March. In that circumstance, the DUP might depart, if they had not already and the Government would either fall or require a new Prime Minister who had not supported the WA
…If the Government brings back the same deal without an exit to the backstop, it will be defeated. If it is defeated, there will be no second referendum or prolonged stay in the EU. The UK will leave. In short, don’t panic: if MPs hold their nerve, we are leaving the EU on 29th March without a permanent backstop.

Note: The ongoing military unification is not addressed by this article or MSM. You could argue that there was a certain expectation that the political class would deliver REMAIN or BRINO (Brexit In Name Only)!

The Brexit Mess Planned All Along To Thwart The Will Of The People – David Icke

What are we to make of these Rt Honourable Oxbridge graduates, Tony Blair, David Cameron and Theresa May?

“May later attended the University of Oxford”

“he (Blair) enrolled for university at St John’s College, Oxford, reading Jurisprudence for three years”

“Cameron began his Bachelor of Arts course in Philosophy, Politics and Economics (PPE) at Brasenose College, Oxford”

They are  not stupid people, so this mess is intentional. I agree with David Icke totally on this. To engineer a Brexit deal worse that remaining in the EU takes some collusion by both parties – May and the EU.

Based on their compulsive lying in support of the EU we can be sure they serve their “hidden hand” masters, They are willing treacherous accomplices.

We can now add another lying treacherous scumbag to this group, privy council oath taker Jeremy Corbyn.

We can take note in December 2018 that 3 recent Prime Ministers being the recipients  of the best (once free) University education Britain has to offer are compliant before the TTIP/TPP corporatist pile of excrement called the European Union.

Questions for the “sovereign” parliamentarians

After Brexit’s turmoil within the political bubble, we see a return to the usual obfuscations.
Theresa May stated, Brexit means Brexit. A meaningless phrase. In our desperation to see the statists acknowledge the dissent of 17.4 million brits, we assumed it was her promise.

However, we begin to wonder about the disconnect between the electorate, party members and the Westminster parliamentarians. Labour, Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and even the Scottish Nationalists  leant towards staying in the EU.

Chart showing MPs backing the leave or remain camps

Direct questioning of these elected representative is now essential preferably in person. To that end here are some questions to size up their integrity:

  • Why do we borrow money with interest from the Bank of England when alternatives like the Bradbury pound exists?
  • Why are the allegations of child abuse and satanic ritual abuse not fully investigated and prosecuted? UK Column links and Zurich Insurance Behind Child Sex Abuse Investigation Shutdown?
  • If the Queen has no discretion in consenting to statutes passed by the parliament, why do we still need this ceremonial consent?
  • Why does the Crown Corporation (City of London) have a permanent unelected “Remembrancer” in the Houses of Parliament?
  • Would they resign having lost the backing of their constituency especially in relation to Brexit?
  • Will they vote to repeal the European Communities Act 1972?
  • Does the existence of the Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 disprove that vaccines are safe?
  • The US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been caught twice lying about its data (Swine flu data scrubbed and MMR study distorted). Does the MMR fraud not warrant a criminal prosecution of the officers of Merck, the makers of the MMR vaccine?
  • Is it ethical and lawful to impose an agreement like the TTIP, arrived at in secrecy upon the public?
  • Is it ethical and lawful to impose a private, corporate court upon a nation state as envisaged in the ISDS?
  • Is it ethical or lawful to grant statutory immunity to the Bank of International Settlements, the IMF, Bank of England and the Federal Reserve? Are these bodies above the “law”?  Where is the equality before the “law”?
  • Are there any rights that cannot be violated by the state? If there are none, then what rights do states claim to protect?
  • If the nation state does not serve the common man/woman, whom does it serve and why are we compelled to honour or consent to their interests?

Let’s call them litmus test questions. The MPs squirming, blathering will clearly show their affiliations. 17.4 Million Brexiteers have questions for their local MPs.
Updated:  14/08/2016

BREXIT: UK Column Exposes the psyop

Published on Jul 14, 2016

Brian Gerrish and Mike Robinson with today’s UK Column News, including:

START Orgiastic political bloodlust : a reshuffle for a rebranded Fascism
03:56 Newspapers ridicule PM & new Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson
05:02 Further unsavory characters to disgrace the British establishment
11:34 Smart Meters & the First Utility organisation : corporate intrigue
13:28 Big Society lies tied into origins of the deceptive ‘living wage’ con
14:37 Hillary “is like a sadistic nurse in a mental hospital…” : says Boris
16:41 Farewell to Oliver Letwin : the financier slave with a task finished
17:52 Brexit Minister David Davis proclaims relentless transnationalism
19:45 European Union : a totalitarian schematic to destroy real Nations
22:51 The full repeal of the 1972 European Communities Act is essential
24:32 An Enemy of Jeremy : the Ambitions of one devious Tom Watson
32:15 The Church of England apologises for sadistic Kendall House ring
35:23 Systematic child abuse blackmail throughout British halls of power
36:04 Role of Home Secretary May in State persecution of abuse victims
38:14 Transhumanism Rising : sinister developments in tech & contracts