Tag Archives: EU Referendum

Questions for the “sovereign” parliamentarians

After Brexit’s turmoil within the political bubble, we see a return to the usual obfuscations.
Theresa May stated, Brexit means Brexit. A meaningless phrase. In our desperation to see the statists acknowledge the dissent of 17.4 million brits, we assumed it was her promise.

However, we begin to wonder about the disconnect between the electorate, party members and the Westminster parliamentarians. Labour, Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and even the Scottish Nationalists  leant towards staying in the EU.

Chart showing MPs backing the leave or remain camps

Direct questioning of these elected representative is now essential preferably in person. To that end here are some questions to size up their integrity:

  • Why do we borrow money with interest from the Bank of England when alternatives like the Bradbury pound exists?
  • Why are the allegations of child abuse and satanic ritual abuse not fully investigated and prosecuted? UK Column links and Zurich Insurance Behind Child Sex Abuse Investigation Shutdown?
  • If the Queen has no discretion in consenting to statutes passed by the parliament, why do we still need this ceremonial consent?
  • Why does the Crown Corporation (City of London) have a permanent unelected “Remembrancer” in the Houses of Parliament?
  • Would they resign having lost the backing of their constituency especially in relation to Brexit?
  • Will they vote to repeal the European Communities Act 1972?
  • Does the existence of the Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 disprove that vaccines are safe?
  • The US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been caught twice lying about its data (Swine flu data scrubbed and MMR study distorted). Does the MMR fraud not warrant a criminal prosecution of the officers of Merck, the makers of the MMR vaccine?
  • Is it ethical and lawful to impose an agreement like the TTIP, arrived at in secrecy upon the public?
  • Is it ethical and lawful to impose a private, corporate court upon a nation state as envisaged in the ISDS?
  • Is it ethical or lawful to grant statutory immunity to the Bank of International Settlements, the IMF, Bank of England and the Federal Reserve? Are these bodies above the “law”?  Where is the equality before the “law”?
  • Are there any rights that cannot be violated by the state? If there are none, then what rights do states claim to protect?
  • If the nation state does not serve the common man/woman, whom does it serve and why are we compelled to honour or consent to their interests?

Let’s call them litmus test questions. The MPs squirming, blathering will clearly show their affiliations. 17.4 Million Brexiteers have questions for their local MPs.
Updated:  14/08/2016

Advertisements

BREXIT: UK Column Exposes the psyop

Published on Jul 14, 2016

Brian Gerrish and Mike Robinson with today’s UK Column News, including:

START Orgiastic political bloodlust : a reshuffle for a rebranded Fascism
03:56 Newspapers ridicule PM & new Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson
05:02 Further unsavory characters to disgrace the British establishment
11:34 Smart Meters & the First Utility organisation : corporate intrigue
13:28 Big Society lies tied into origins of the deceptive ‘living wage’ con
14:37 Hillary “is like a sadistic nurse in a mental hospital…” : says Boris
16:41 Farewell to Oliver Letwin : the financier slave with a task finished
17:52 Brexit Minister David Davis proclaims relentless transnationalism
19:45 European Union : a totalitarian schematic to destroy real Nations
22:51 The full repeal of the 1972 European Communities Act is essential
24:32 An Enemy of Jeremy : the Ambitions of one devious Tom Watson
32:15 The Church of England apologises for sadistic Kendall House ring
35:23 Systematic child abuse blackmail throughout British halls of power
36:04 Role of Home Secretary May in State persecution of abuse victims
38:14 Transhumanism Rising : sinister developments in tech & contracts

Brexit: At Last, a Jewish Prime Minister?

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/2016/7/11/at-last-a-jewish-prime-minister
theresa may je suis juif
“Jews in Britain and Israel are over the moon with Theresa May becoming the British prime minister.

The Israeli Ynet describes May as “Israel’s true friend.”

The JC reports that May has worked closely with the Community Security Trust, a Jewish organisation that cares for the security of one ethnic group that believes itself to be chosen. May had committed another £13.4 million of government money to Jewish security measures and had made her intentions towards the community clear.”

Public Notice to World Despots: US and UK drop their facade

June 6th 2016
This a public notice to all tinpot dictators labelled as such by the west.

We hereby inform your excellencies that we are dropping any further pretence of being morally superior. We have conceded we are and have been hypocrites of the highest order in our claims of following the “rule of law” or practising “democracy”

We wish to give special notice to the following despots: Mugabe of Zimbabwe, Basher al-Assad of Syria, Kim Jong-II of N. Korea, Yoweri Museveni of Uganda, Vladimir Putin of Russia and  Teodoro Mbasogo Equitorial Guinea that though they have been singled out for particular notice their actions are in conformity with the corrupt actions of the US and UK over the past 20 years.

To a certain extent we were no longer able to competently maintain the charade, so often we outwitted ourselves and the plebiscites saw behind the curtain.

A case in point is Brexit. The plebs voted to leave the European Union on the 23rd June 2016. We are currently stalling for time to seek ways to invalidate the will of the plebiscites. God knows we will not be asking them any important questions in the future.

We have tried to give Queen Elizabeth II and the Pope the ability to claim ignorance of our deceits and despotism but unfortunately by their ceremonial consents they are complicit in  our despotism masked with displays of “democracy” or pious deference.

It requires less effort and sophistry to be openly corrupt, criminal, duplicitous and murderous in pursuit of our interests and the management of our human income generating stock.

If you seek further evidence of our hypocrisy reflect on our US FBI investigators agreeing that Hilary Clinton was grossly negligent in her duties as foreign secretary however as a member of our network, she will not get even a slap on the wrist or cheek. A “citizen” can expect the  whole statute book to be thrown at them.

We concede that this open display of contempt for “the rule of law” will require overt violence however we have built up the apparatus of the police and surveillance state incrementally whilst the plebiscites were occupied with Game of Thrones, X factor or their favourite sporting spectacle.

We may share some tricks of the trade in state-craft in the event you are bored and decide to practise some sophistry. Take the Chilcot Report, you will note the long duration and polite language for what was really our criminal destruction and exploitation of Iraq. We made sure Right Honourable Anthony Blair is well paid and protected for his good work in furthering our interests.

Another trick of the trade is to make your citizens dependent directly on the state for income or indirectly via state to corporate handouts. The plebiscites will consent to your actions despite knowing better. Scaring them with bogus bogeymen also works, you can position yourself as the strong person protecting the flock.

We know you will find it increasingly difficult to restrain wild laughter whenever we mention “law”, “democracy”, “human rights” however these platitudes sound good on TV and make for fabricated historical records as to current events.

The only thing we fear from the plebiscite, is that enough of them put their petty irritations of race, sexuality, religion aside and focus their time, effort, thoughts and imagination in nullifying our control. It is a fear but very remote as we have spent the past 4 decades poisoning their food and water, misinforming , debilitating their ranks. Our medical wing have created the perfect cover for our eugenics in the vaccine!

It has been rough on you and yes we had to get rid of Saddam and Gaddafi for trying to upset our cartel but that’s water under the bridge, after all we are now openly despotic birds of a feather.

We therefore apologise to all prior tinpot dictators henceforth called His/Her Most Honourable Excellencies.

Let us rule without pretence and enjoy the infinite printing power of our moneyed accomplices.

UK Column: Recommend Weekday viewing

https://www.youtube.com/user/ukcolumn

START Iraq Inquiry & Admiral West : ‘Some bastard told me to do it…’
2:32 Ellis – ‘It wasn’t about nuclear weapons. It was about currency.’
5:54 ‘a drive to connect Saddam to something we can pin him to…’
7:21 rationalisation of intelligence systems across the EU superstate
10:14 police receive internet record access in spite of data-breaches
13:01 NATO summit in Warsaw in provocative escalation context
16:17 ‘the Euro currency has failed’ – ‘currency reset’ via military
19:21 legitimate spheres of influence & the monetary Axis of Evil
21:58 agenda of ‘global monetary interests using military power’
22:23 ‘constant interference’ in the Scottish child abuse inquiry
24:01 Nicky Morgan launches a sinister ‘staying close’ scheme
28:22 ukcolumn breakdown of the establishment Abuse-rings
30:34 Mark Carney announces a grand scheme to fix Britain
34:23 the Missing Years of Oliver Letwin & New York links
38:05 ‘Parliamentary Labour Party is being ripped apart…’
40:41 Ken Loach & policy control at the time of the strikes
42:27 a one-party-State & ‘Oliver Letwin’s private fiefdom’
42:43 Nazi continuation plans & a European Book Review
45:59 ‘inflated thieving financial services’ & wild corruption
48:02 eurocrats signify disrespect whilst legal questions stand
49:57 ‘we need to elect six hundred & fifty independent MPs’
51:26 a German sovereignty movement picks up a little steam
53:48 shouts at a Minister of ‘Traitor! Traitor! Get out of here!’

Brexit: Will the Queen betray her Trust?

A leading and inflammatory question? Yes, indeed, Brexit is that serious!

It rests on simple ideas. We are informed or rather the narrative is that the Queen is the protector of the interests of the common man in Great Britain and some commonwealth countries. She swore to this in her coronation oath:

” Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements
The Queen’s Coronation Oath 1953

We also note that the Queen leads the privy council of which the Prime Minister and his opposition are members. This acknowledes a deference to the Queen.

What happens in the following scenario:

The “sovereign” parliamentarians ignore the electorate by delays, obfuscations and rejection of the EU referendum.

In negating the will of the electorate the “sovereign” parliamentarians have relinquished their delegated right to govern.

The Queen is called on to consent to acts and statutes passed by a parliament that has lost its consent from the electorate.

The Queen can betray her stewardship and oath to ceremoniously consent or she can state that she cannot consent to “laws” brought forth by a parliament having lost its authority, goodwill and consent from the public.

Then there are the mundane and legal conceptions of Trust.chart_of_a_trust

In the diagram let us say the “government” is the Trustee, if the People are the settlors and the Queen is the protector? Has she not failed in her duty?

I would contend that a can of putrid worms will be opened should “sovereign” parliamentarians decide to betray their trust!

Please feel free to rip apart my logic, omissions, mistakes. I look forward to an interesting debate or discussion on the constitutional implications of any betrayal of the Brexit result for the UK and the Queen.

Image: Wikipedia