Tag Archives: UK

Twitter launches new search tool to combat vaccine misinformation

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/techandscience/twitter-launches-new-search-tool-to-combat-vaccine-misinformation/ar-AABnJ8H?ocid=spartanntp&MSCC=1557929295
vaccine injection-norbert millauer-afp-getty
Twitter has launched a new search tool to combat the spread of misinformation about vaccines on the social network.
Users will now be prompted to visit a credible public health resource when they search on Twitter for certain keywords related to vaccines, Twitter said in a blog post Friday. In the US, Twitter has partnered with the Department of Health and Human Services to direct users to the agency’s Vaccines.gov.
A search for the word “vaccines,” for example, generates a message at the top of users’ feeds that says “To make sure you get the best information on vaccinations, resources are available from the US Department of Health & Human Services.”
The new tool comes as tech companies face mounting pressure from lawmakers, activists and health experts to prevent anti-vax misinformation from going viral. The misinformation may have contributed to an outbreak of measles in the US.
Other tech companies have also beefed up their efforts to combat misinformation about vaccines. Facebook said in March it would demote the ranking of groups or pages that spread misinformation about vaccines on its News Feed and in search results. Pinterest blocked anti-vaccination searches and has tried to pull down anti-vax content. In February, YouTube said it would remove ads from videos that feature anti-vaccination content.

Note: Do these pro-vaxxers think this will stop criticism of vaccines? Their attempts at censorship on social media (modern book burning), simply highlight their “faith” in vaccines. Real science is NEVER afraid of criticism.

Here is a question for the pro-vaxxers and their drug pushing Big Pharma corporatists: How many vaccines is too many for a child/teenager? 50 before age 16? 100 maybe? What is the upper, sustainable limit? At what number does the toxic/foreign body load become counter-productive?

Advertisements

Walter Hallstein: Nazi Legalese practitioner and founding father of the E.U.

The “honourable” gang members of parliament are back from their Easter break, so we need to remind ourselves of the nature of the EU superstate and why their supplicant behaviour is treacherous.

Walter Hallstein was a German academic, diplomat, and politician. He was the first president of the Commission of the European Economic Community and one of the founding fathers of the European Union. – wikipedia

Walter_Hallstein-Nazi 1st president of the EU

Walter was a member of many leading Nazi organizations the most significant of
which were the National Socialists university lecturers association and the National
Socialist League for protection of the law.
These organizations cater to committed members of the Nazi Party – officially the National Socialist German Workers’ Party

Furthermore we have Walter’s ‘Conquest Speech’ given in Rostock, Germany, on 23 January 1939, of which I have some excerpts:

“The Creation of the Greater German Reich is:
A political fact, a ‘Fuehrer Act’ of Epochal Dimension;
One of those Acts that change the Landscape of History and fulfill an old Longing of the People;
An Economic Event of sheer unimaginable consequences;
An event of exceptional significance from the perspective of the History of the Law.”

“The failure to put this law into action is one of the unfinished tasks and failures of the Second German Reich.”

“The Law for the Protection of the German Blood and the German Honor

More can be found in the book The Nazi Roots of the Brussels EU

As we describe in our book, The Nazi Roots of the Brussels EU, the key architects of the so-called ‘European Union’ were recruited from among the same technocrats who had previously designed the plans for a post-WW2 Europe under the control of the Nazi/IG Farben coalition. Based on literally tens of thousands of historical documents obtained by our Foundation from international archives, the growing global awareness of the facts means that the Brussels EU “experiment” is effectively now over

http://www.reject-the-eu.co.uk/nazi-roots/chapter.html

Brexit: Jason Hunter the Hypocritical Psycopathic Remainer!

I came across one of Jason Hunter’s youtube videos. It did challenge my ideas on a no deal Brexit. I was initially keen to delve deeper into what he had to say but this particular talk on youtube showed clearly what we a dealing with: A psychopathic, smug, hypocritical EUphile.

Firstly, Jason does point out factually the pitiful inadequacy of the Rt Hon Theresa May’s cabinet and the civil service regarding Brexit. On this I have to agree with him.
The facts or allusions to them cannot be denied. There are hundreds of treaties which must be recreated. Jason mentions 750.
Jason Hunter makes no pretense at being impartial, neither do I. He wants the referendum result revoked due to fraud by leave campaigners. He even throws in Russian collusion via social media bots.
What nonsense. Any criticism of the west is classed as Russian collusion. Are the Russians persecuting Lyn Thyer or David Noakes for making GcMaf or mandating vaccines?
Back to this hypocrite, Jason Hunter. Let us use his own words to expose his motivations and psychopathy or not:

Let us contrast two statements Jason makes in this video. Concern for people losing their jobs, incomes.
@12:25

“jobs, is jobs, is jobs, its not, its households. It’s people. Real people lives, real people incomes, real peoples mortgage payments, that’s what we’re talking about”

Versus, what he did for a large steel company
@15:51

“For several years, I was head of strategic planning for a very large steel company and we’d pick another country’s industry, say an automotive and we want to sell them flat steel…
once we’ve destroyed that competitor, we have that market all to ourselves for the next 5, 10, 15 years…”

He was not concerned about “people’s” jobs or incomes when his steel employer destroyed their competitor however due to Brexit he is concerned for destroyed jobs and companies.
He accepts capital’s exploitative predation and psychopathy when they(he) is the predator but not when he or the UK are victims of that same predation.

@25:40

“The EU are pulling their hair out, we’ve got back channels over there, we talk to them regularly”

@28:00

“We’ve talked with some of the leading drug manufacturers here in the UK, we talked with GlaxoSmithKline, talked to AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson…the big four if you like and they consult with the government”

– GlaxoSmithKline (make Cervarix HPV vaccine)
– AstraZeneca UK (make Fluenz Tetra flu vaccine)
– Johnson & Johnson (researching HIV/Ebola vaccines)

He has back-channels to the EU that openly disclose confidential activity between UK government ministers and the EU. It clearly show a strange level of intimacy to my mind. From what I gather, he has negotiated “trade deals” for companies NOT nation-states, so why does he have this degree of intimate access to Brussels and pharma?

The real deceit by this man, as he positions it as a rational choice, is to “pause” Brexit by revoking Article 50! I say it is a deceit because he must know once Brexit is stopped by revoking the divorce document (article 50), the political will for Brexit evaporates. Neither party will ever initiate the Brexit process ever again!. Real Brexiteers are in the minority in parlimanent.

Jason Hunter is still worth listening to for a dose of Brexit reality. However are his views consistent with someone truly concerned for liberty, “democracy”, or rejection of capital’s priests/oligarchs and their psychopathy?

Brexit “Exit Day” delayed!

EU Exit Day Amendment
European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (Exit Day) (Amendment) Regulations 2019

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/divisions/pw-2019-03-27-394-commons
EU Exit Day Amendment 27-03-2019
439 UK MPs voted to change the day we leave the EU from 11pm 29th March 2019 to 12 April or 22 May 2019.
The Amendment also passed the Lords. We now have alignment between EU Decree (EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2019/476) and local UK law.

The “Right Honourable” (sic inversion) Theresa May has offered to resign after she has passed her deal. Let me rephrase that, she has offered to leave after forever binding the UK as a vassal state to the United States of Europe. Other bloggers on this platform have posted material on the origins of the EU. A link had the following appropriate excerpt:

The head of the Ford Foundation, ex-OSS officer Paul Hoffman, doubled as head of ACUE in the late Fifties. The State Department also played a role. A memo from the European section, dated June 11, 1965, advises the vice-president of the European Economic Community, Robert Marjolin, to pursue monetary union by stealth.

It recommends suppressing debate until the point at which “adoption of such proposals would become virtually inescapable”.

Euro-federalists financed by US spy chiefs

I see commonality in this behaviour with the vaccine debate and zionism. Suppress debate until the end goal is inescapable.

The most rational course of action if these “honourable” parliamentarians were being true to the “democratic principles” would be to go for a No Deal Brexit, to test public support for the inflicted pain that maybe a consequence.
The procrastination, delays, political, legal, rhetorical maneuvers to avoid the result of the referendum have been revealing.
If the result had gone in favour of the EU (remaining within it), we would have seen a swift and timely conclusion to this affair.

These proceedings have been a litmus test for every UK Member of Parliament. We have seen Europhile MPs – informed, willing or ignorant – of all genders, races and regions (England, Wales, Scotland, N.Ireland).
It is a repugnant sight, to see the sophistry needed to refute the will of 17.4M people, who desired a break from the European Union.

We can forgive the ignorant MPs, they can be classed as incompetent. They supported the EU without understanding its true nature and desired end goal.
Our enmity must be focused on those informed and aware MPs, Ministers, civil servants and media personnel that engaged in the required deceits in support of the EU project. Once ignorance is ruled out, we have only “guilty mind”. Willing accomplices, willing betrayal!
We have their voting records and their public rhetoric. Will this be the tipping point for a reckoning of the pretentious political class?

Lyn Thyer Extradition Hearing @Royal Court of Justice(?) – Part 2

Lyn Thyer Extradition Hearing Part 2
The Royal Courts of Justice
10AM Thursday 28th March 2019
The Strand, London WC2A 2LLLyn Thyer Extradition Hearing 28th March 2019

“The British CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) could NOT find any justifiable reason to bring charges against Lyn…the french equivalent of MHRA decided they would attempt to extradite Lyn”

Lyn Thyer (biochemist) is facing extradition by Le Cleiss (the French equivalent of the MHRA)

Links to related articles:
LYN THYER (GCMAF) EXTRADITION HEARING
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/ianrcrane/
https://www.brighteon.com/6014349845001
https://www.oye.news/news/health/lyn-thyer-facing-extradition-over-unlicensed-cancer-treatment/
https://ukgovernmentwatch.wordpress.com/2019/03/13/lyn-thyer-gcmaf-extradition-hearing/
https://steemit.com/dtube/@ianrcrane/pxct6ewe

http://learncommonlaw.today/index.php/videos/video/72-2019-embracing-the-chaos-ian-r-crane

How did your MP vote?

https://www.publicwhip.org.uk/
https://www.theyworkforyou.com

UK Withdrawal from the European Union — Delay Withdrawal if MPs Agree Withdrawal Agreement — 14 Mar 2019 at 17:00

Party Summary
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

Party Majority (Aye) Minority (No) Both Turnout
Con 111 (+2 tell) 187 (+2 tell) 1 96.5%
DUP 0 10 0 100.0%
Green 1 0 0 100.0%
Independent 13 1 0 70.0%
Lab 237 3 0 97.6%
LDem 11 0 0 100.0%
PC 4 0 0 100.0%
SNP 35 0 0 100.0%
Total: 412 201 1 96.4%

The majority of Labour, Independents,  Liberal Democrats and Scottish Nationalist Party voted for a delay. So we have 412 “honourable” and informed members of Parliament voting for a delay versus 201 voting against.

Based on these numbers, the Europhilic MPs have enough numbers to push through the votes to change the law concerning the default exit day of 29th march 2019.

Treacherous europhiles! Labour…protecting the working class corporations and the EU superstate?