Inside high security laboratory developing a Zika vaccine – BBC News

27 January 2016
Talking Heads
Prof Scott Weaver
Director Institute for Human Infections and Immunity
Dr Shannan Rossie
Uni of Texas Medical Branch
Prof Nikos Vasilakis
Centre for Biodefence and Emerging Infectious Disease

Reporter: James Cook

Scott Weaver: Last Year when it reached Brazil, it really exploded when it reached the Americas, infecting probably a couple of million people at this point

James Cook: and should  people we be frightened, especially pregnant women?

Scott Weaver: Absolutely, if you know, if I had a daughter of child bearing age, she was planning a spring break vacation to the carribean, next few months I would strongly urge her not to go there at this point

Note: Prof Scott Weaver is emphatic that Zika is a threat to pregnant women however he said child bearing age was a concern if he had a daughter. Scott Weaver is either a liar or has information on the link between Zika and microcephaly.

Zika is in Africa and the Pacific, so would he be concerned about travelling to those areas? Why not? Is the strain of Zika in Brazil different to those in Africa and Asia-pacific? Oh, the carrier is different possibly, the strain of Aedes egypti, does that have any bearing on the transmission of Zika?

Prof Scott Weaver has no problems with his hypothetical daughter travelling to Zika infested Africa but is concernied with the strain of zika and the strain of mosquito in the carribean?

I was inclined to write off both Prof Scott Weaver and his Galvaston colleague Prof Nikos Vasilakis as liars for not providing the evidence for their assertions. Show us the causal link that gives you the certainty that Zika is linked to microcephaly.

This blogger and others could not understand why they rushed to assert a link without entertaining other possiblities namely vaccines given during pregnancy, pollutants, the impact of malnoutrition or the GM Aedes Egypti mosquitoes themselves.

Then it dawned on me, an unpalatable possibility, they both know that zika passes the placental barrier and impacts fetal brain development. These virologists are amongt a few people that deal with viruses routinely. They would know what type of arbovirus could defeat the placental barrier, they would know what strain of mosquito would be a carrier. Prof Weavers adamant refusal to let his hypohetical daughter visit the carribean starts to make sense. It is also evidence that cannot be shared wihout further questions arising. It also explains why Vasilakis and Rossie were interested in placental fluids on their visit in Dec 2015.

I hope I am wrong. That these f@#king psycopaths would collect viruses, engineer and release them to see the effects is difficult to accept.

Have a look at psycopath Scott C. Weaver’s “encephalitis papers on PubMed. Scotty has been on this topic for 10 years at least. Straight from the horses mouth:
Direct broad-range detection of alphaviruses in mosquito extracts.
“Members of the genus Alphavirus are a diverse group of principally mosquito-borne RNA viruses. There are at least 29 species and many more subtypes of alphaviruses and some are considered potential bioweapons“

Truth-out: Florida Dengue Fever Outbreak Leads Back to CIA and Army Experiments

http://truth-out.org/archive/component/k2/item/90808:florida-dengue-fever-outbreak-leads-back-to-cia-and-army-experiments
Wednesday, 21 July 2010 12:08
By HP Albarelli Jr and Zoe Martell

Unknown to most Americans is that dengue fever has been the intense focus of US Army and CIA biological warfare researchers for over 50 years. Ed Regis notes in his excellent history of Fort Detrick, “The Biology of Doom,” that as early as 1942 leading biochemists at the installation placed dengue fever on a long list for serious consideration as a possible weapon. In the early 1950s, Fort Detrick, in partnership with the CIA, launched a multi-million dollar research program under which dengue fever and several addition exotic diseases were studied for use in offensive biological warfare attacks. Assumably, because the virus is generally not lethal, program planners viewed it primarily as an incapacitant. Reads one CIA Project Artichoke document: “Not all viruses have to be lethal … the objective includes those that act as short-term and long-term incapacitants.”

Activistpost: Viruses And The GM Insect “Flying Vaccine” Solution

http://www.activistpost.com/2010/12/viruses-and-gm-insect-flying-vaccine.html
DECEMBER 13, 2010
Brandon Turbeville

“…The basic premise behind the flying mosquito vaccines is that an insect will be genetically modified to produce antibodies to a certain disease in their saliva, which is then transmitted to the individual when the mosquito bites them.
There is a host of problems with this method that range from the moral to the scientific. First, the presence of antibodies does not necessarily mean immunity, and the transfer of them does not in any way provide immunization to the subject being injected with them. The science related to antibodies and immunity is still largely unsettled. Vaccines, themselves, are completely ineffective and have never been proven effective by a study that was not connected to a drug company or a pharmaceutical company.[1] They are, essentially, faith-based medicine…”

Full Article: Viruses And The GM Insect “Flying Vaccine” Solution

Synthetic (GM) Insects as weapons

If a small nation state engineers an insect common to a target (enemy) state and releases it within the boundaries of its target country, is that an act of war?

If a DIY synthetic biologists, tinkers with midges, mosquitoes or any biting insect which then inflicts harm on fellow citizens, is he directly culpable?

If a corporation engineers an insect and releases it within a town, is it liable for any resultant harm or injury?

If a nation state in partnership with a corporation releases a “synthetic” mosquito into your neighbourhood that causes harm, are they both liable?

Oxitec/Intrexon are at the forefront of what is a very cheap means of biowarfare or eugenics. The technology is within the reach of time rich and well funded individuals.

Nation states, corporations, individuals creating synthetic insects to design and the consequent mistakes or deliberate actions that will ensure is a reality.

How will the statists or corporate pirates hide their mistakes? If the mistake occurs in the target country, its a release 1.0 build, let us try release 1.1. It will be better.

It is now openly stated and documented by the existence of the field of synthetic virologists and biologists that bacteria, viruses and insects can be made to order.

Acknowledging this fact, what is a community not inclined to use this technology offensively to do? Reactive biological surveillance and analysis?

How do you deal with funded foundations linked to vaccines, gene editing Editas, Glyphosate Monsanto and now GM mosquitoes Oxitec?

A supranational body like WHO is beholden to its sponsers, so in the case of a “pandemic”, what objectives will WHO and linked supra-national bodies achieve? Objectives compliant with their sponsors, no?

What will be the solution? More DNA engineering with viruses and insects. Vaccines and GM research will be the corporate cry.

A country finds itself in the midst of a strange, new, “emerging” disease. It does not have the capability to sequence the offending virus, bacteria or insect, so accepts whatever assistance supra-national and external governments provide. That naivete and lack of independent analysis means even an overt attack will not be seen as an act of war or subjugation, merely a pandemic requiring external assistance.

Synthetic insects, synthetic viruses are a fact. Like any weapon it can be used offensively or defensively but here is the huge problem with the synthetic life technocrats – can you really use synthetic insects in a defensive way? Once released you relinquish control. You have no way to predict the outcome. Even offensively, it is a short term tactic with unknown long term effects for the initiator or its target.

The technology is now routine, its offensive impact has yet to sink in…its defensive usefulness is questionable.

ADVISE TO STATISTS: Start spending some of your public health budget on DNA monitoring/sequencing of your local ecology, pronto! You can then prove an “emerging” pandemic as a foreign introduction.

BBC: Zika virus: US scientists say vaccine ’10 years away’

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-35423288

The search for a vaccine is being led by scientists at the University of Texas Medical Branch.

They have visited Brazil to carry out research and collect samples, and are now analysing them in a suite of high-security laboratories in Galveston
…
Nikos Vasilakis, an assistant professor in the university’s pathology department who works in the Centre for Biodefence and Emerging Infectious Diseases in Galveston, said they could have a vaccine ready for testing within a year or two, although he warned that winning approval from regulators could take much longer

Prof Nikos Vasilakis

Note: There we have it, the keyword, “emerging” diseases.
If the narrative is true, we should see microcephaly in Africa since the 1940, in Nigeria from the 70s.
The genius of the “scare”, vaccine research funding, GM mosquitoes funding and birth control. Profit and control, sweet!
The synthetic virus makers will create the “anti-virus” for Ebola, Zika and other emerging viruses in the product/profit pipeline. Well the model works for computers why not the apply it to the biological vehicle for our earthly incarnation?

Zika Virus: A New Threat and a New Kind of Pandemic

http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2016/01/13/zika-2/

“Zika virus forces us to confront a potential new disease-emergence phenomenon: pandemic expansion of multiple, heretofore relatively unimportant arboviruses previously restricted to remote ecologic niches,” they write. “To respond, we urgently need research on these viruses and the ecologic, entomologic, and host determinants of viral maintenance and emergence. Also needed are better public health strategies to control arboviral spread.”

Question: Why is there now a pandemic of an “emerging” Zika mosquito borne virus, now that we have increased research into just that? Mosquitoes as vectors for disease. According to wikipedia, Zika has been very rare until 2007 and the recent cases.

The government’s war on humanity: DEPOPULATION is here!

Published on Nov 5, 2015
The government’s war on humanity is here! Instead of encouraging population growth and expansion, the governments of the world are now actively trying to DEPOPULATE the planet of humans.

Extreme Genetic Engineering: An Introduction to Synthetic Biology

http://www.etcgroup.org/content/extreme-genetic-engineering-introduction-synthetic-biology
ETC Group Releases Report on Synthetic Biology
Submitted on 16 January 2007

“Genetic engineering is passé,” said Pat Mooney, Executive Director of ETC Group. “Today, scientists aren’t just mapping genomes and manipulating genes, they’re building life from scratch – and they’re doing it in the absence of societal debate and regulatory oversight,” said Mooney.

Synbio – dubbed “genetic engineering on steroids” – is inspired by the convergence of nano-scale biology, computing and engineering. Using a laptop computer, published gene sequence information and mail-order synthetic DNA, just about anyone has the potential to construct genes or entire genomes from scratch (including those of lethal pathogens). Scientists predict that within 2-5 years it will be possible to synthesise any virus; the first de novo bacterium will make its debut in 2007; in 5-10 years simple bacterial genomes will be synthesised routinely and it will become no big deal to cobble together a designer genome, insert it into an empty bacterial cell and – voilà – give birth to a living, self-replicating organism. Other synthetic biologists hope to reconfigure the genetic pathways of existing organisms to perform new functions – such as manufacturing high-value drugs or chemicals.

WHO – Ebola Situation Report – 22 July 2015

http://apps.who.int/ebola/current-situation/ebola-situation-report-22-july-2015

There were 26 confirmed cases of Ebola virus disease (EVD) reported in the week to 19 July: 22 in Guinea and 4 in Sierra Leone. Liberia reported no new cases

Country	Case definition	Cumulative cases	Cases in past 21 days	Cumulative deaths
Guinea	Confirmed	3322	53	2062
	Probable	450	*	450
	Suspected	11	*	‡
	Total	3783	53	2512
Liberia§	Confirmed	3151	–	‡
	Probable	1879	–	‡
	Suspected	5636	–	‡
	Total	10 666	–	4806
Liberia**	Confirmed	6	6	2
	Probable	0	*	‡
	Suspected	‡	*	‡
	Total	6	6	2
Sierra Leone	Confirmed	8692	27	3583
	Probable	287	*	208
	Suspected	4271	*	158
	Total	13 250	27	3949
Total	Confirmed	15 171	86	‡
	Probable	2616	*	‡
	Suspected	9918	*	‡
	Total	27 705	86	11 269

Note: Data published by WHO. Its veracity or omissions reside with them and their partner organisations.

WHO – Ebola Situation Report – 29 April 2015

http://apps.who.int/ebola/current-situation/ebola-situation-report-29-april-2015

• 33 confirmed cases of Ebola (EVD) were reported in the week to 26 Apr

Confirmed, probable, and suspected EVD cases in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone

Country	Case definition	Cumulative cases	Cases in past 21 days	Cumulative deaths
Guinea	Confirmed	3158	69	1962
	Probable	415	*	415
	Suspected	11	*	‡
	Total	3584	69	2377 (66%)
Liberia**	Confirmed	3151	0	‡
	Probable	1879	*	‡
	Suspected	5292	*	‡
	Total	10 322	0	4608 (44.6%)
Sierra Leone	Confirmed	8586	32	3533
	Probable	287	*	208
	Suspected	3498	*	158
	Total	12 371	32	3899 (31.5%)
Total	Confirmed	14 895	101	‡
	Probable	2581	*	‡
	Suspected	8801	*	‡
	Total	26 277	101	10 884 (41.4%)

Note: Figures in brackets () are mortality rates based on W.H.O. data which is not above questioning!