Zika causing microcephaly is pure bovine excrement. Callout the experts, academics, talking heads, MSM as liars and BS pushers!
Associate Professor of Demography,
Harvard T.H. Chan School
As of 4th March 2016
– 5900 suspected cases
– 640 confirmed for microcephaly
– Only 80 had zika virus
Note: Zika (or dengue) found in 80 out of 640 (12.5%) cases of confirmed microcephaly. 87.5% of microcephaly cases tested negative for zika (or dengue) virus. Dengue virus may be creating false positives for zika. Zika and dengue are very similar.
World Health Organisation (Bogus Pandemic and vaccine pushers – Swine/Zika)
Editas (Gene splicing)
Oxitec (GM Mosquitoes)
Microsoft (NSA Backdoored OSes)
Planned Parenthood via his father
It is best to start viewing these Forbes richlists with some suspicion! Based on land holdings, Queen Elizabeth II has the largest land holdings which is estimated to be worth trillions! Trillions NOT billions!
Note: 25K microcephaly cases in the US, why? Brazil has less than 300 confirmed cases out of the dubious 4000 claimed cases.
Will W.H.O. declare the US an affected pandemic region in relation to microcephaly of unknown cause?
Hint to CDC and WHO: Vaccine induced damage, GMO crop consumption, glyphosates, pesticides
Note: Thanks to a post on WRH, posting this for archival purposes. Of interest is the depositor, Rockefeller Foundation. Interesting, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) share the same interest in viruses and their manipulation. An interest in continuing the rockefeller allopathic eugenicists policies.
Zika virus search link on ATCC Site
Zika virus (ATCC® VR-84™)
ATCC® Number: VR-84™
Classification: Flaviviridae, Flavivirus
Strain: MR 766 (Original)
Product Format: freeze-dried
Biosafety Level: 2
Source: Blood from experimental forest sentinel rhesus monkey, Uganda, 1947
Effect on Host: Paralysis and death
If a small nation state engineers an insect common to a target (enemy) state and releases it within the boundaries of its target country, is that an act of war?
If a DIY synthetic biologists, tinkers with midges, mosquitoes or any biting insect which then inflicts harm on fellow citizens, is he directly culpable?
If a corporation engineers an insect and releases it within a town, is it liable for any resultant harm or injury?
If a nation state in partnership with a corporation releases a “synthetic” mosquito into your neighbourhood that causes harm, are they both liable?
Oxitec/Intrexon are at the forefront of what is a very cheap means of biowarfare or eugenics. The technology is within the reach of time rich and well funded individuals.
Nation states, corporations, individuals creating synthetic insects to design and the consequent mistakes or deliberate actions that will ensure is a reality.
How will the statists or corporate pirates hide their mistakes? If the mistake occurs in the target country, its a release 1.0 build, let us try release 1.1. It will be better.
It is now openly stated and documented by the existence of the field of synthetic virologists and biologists that bacteria, viruses and insects can be made to order.
Acknowledging this fact, what is a community not inclined to use this technology offensively to do? Reactive biological surveillance and analysis?
How do you deal with funded foundations linked to vaccines, gene editing Editas, Glyphosate Monsanto and now GM mosquitoes Oxitec?
A supranational body like WHO is beholden to its sponsers, so in the case of a “pandemic”, what objectives will WHO and linked supra-national bodies achieve? Objectives compliant with their sponsors, no?
What will be the solution? More DNA engineering with viruses and insects. Vaccines and GM research will be the corporate cry.
A country finds itself in the midst of a strange, new, “emerging” disease. It does not have the capability to sequence the offending virus, bacteria or insect, so accepts whatever assistance supra-national and external governments provide. That naivete and lack of independent analysis means even an overt attack will not be seen as an act of war or subjugation, merely a pandemic requiring external assistance.
Synthetic insects, synthetic viruses are a fact. Like any weapon it can be used offensively or defensively but here is the huge problem with the synthetic life technocrats – can you really use synthetic insects in a defensive way? Once released you relinquish control. You have no way to predict the outcome. Even offensively, it is a short term tactic with unknown long term effects for the initiator or its target.
The technology is now routine, its offensive impact has yet to sink in…its defensive usefulness is questionable.
ADVISE TO STATISTS: Start spending some of your public health budget on DNA monitoring/sequencing of your local ecology, pronto! You can then prove an “emerging” pandemic as a foreign introduction.