Tucker Carlson interviews Erin Marie Olszewski
New York Nurse Erin Marie Olszewski The (Undercover) Epicenter Nurse
Tucker Carlson interviews Erin Marie Olszewski
New York Nurse Erin Marie Olszewski The (Undercover) Epicenter Nurse
Early use of large dose antioxidants, such as vitamin C (VC) may become an effective treatment for these patients. Clinical studies also show that high-dose oral VC provides certain protection against viral infection. Neither intravenous nor oral administration of high-dose VC is associated with significant side effects. Therefore, this regimen should be included in the treatment of COVID-19 and used as a preventative measure for susceptible populations such as healthcare workers with higher exposure risks.
Most of my readers now know that my blog has been taken down by WordPress for no stated reason. We are working to restore the blog on to another server. You’re reading this either because you’re already subscribed to my email list or someone forwarded this email to you. If you’re in the latter category, then the best way to get my daily articles is go to NoMoreFakeNews.com and sign up for the email list in the upper left corner. You’ll get articles in your inbox. Thank you for your support.
This is the way the experts present autism to the public:
“It is a specific condition. We know that. It has a specific cause. We know that, too. We haven’t discovered the cause yet, but we’re making progress. Vaccines have nothing to do with autism. Most likely, the disease is genetic…”
First of all, on what basis do the experts claim they know autism is a specific condition? What do they mean by “specific?”
We can find the answer to these questions by understanding how autism is defined. And how do we do that?
There is only one way. We read the official medical definition of autism.
I will now ask you to make an effort and read the complete medical definition. Please. Plow your way through it, and as you do, ask yourself whether it strikes you as “specific.” Ask yourself if the words add up to a well-formed tight description—or do they seem to suggest a committee of psychiatrists sitting around juggling a list of behaviors and arbitrarily clustering them under the label, AUTISM:
[The following definition of autism is from Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM IV (1994)]
(I) A total of six (or more) items from (A), (B), and (C), with at least two from (A), and one each from (B) and (C):
(A) qualitative impairment in social interaction, as manifested by at least two of the following:
1. marked impairments in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors such as eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body posture, and gestures to regulate social interaction
2. failure to develop peer relationships appropriate to developmental level
3. a lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interests, or achievements with other people, (e.g., by a lack of showing, bringing, or pointing out objects of interest to other people)
4. lack of social or emotional reciprocity ( note: in the description, it gives the following as examples: not actively participating in simple social play or games, preferring solitary activities, or involving others in activities only as tools or “mechanical” aids )
(B) qualitative impairments in communication as manifested by at least one of the following:
1. delay in, or total lack of, the development of spoken language (not accompanied by an attempt to compensate through alternative modes of communication such as gesture or mime)
2. in individuals with adequate speech, marked impairment in the ability to initiate or sustain a conversation with others
3. stereotyped and repetitive use of language or idiosyncratic language
4. lack of varied, spontaneous make-believe play or social imitative play appropriate to developmental level
(C) restricted repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests and activities, as manifested by at least two of the following:
1. encompassing preoccupation with one or more stereotyped and restricted patterns of interest that is abnormal either in intensity or focus
2. apparently inflexible adherence to specific, nonfunctional routines or rituals
3. stereotyped and repetitive motor mannerisms (e.g hand or finger flapping or twisting, or complex whole-body movements)
4. persistent preoccupation with parts of objects
(II) Delays or abnormal functioning in at least one of the following areas, with onset prior to age 3 years:
(A) social interaction
(B) language as used in social communication
(C) symbolic or imaginative play
(III) The disturbance is not better accounted for by Rett’s Disorder or Childhood Disintegrative Disorder.
Well, that’s it. That’s all of it. That’s the official definition of autism.
It couldn’t be less specific.
Also, notice that no single cause is listed. They don’t have one. They will claim it’s genetic, but they offer no proof. If they had solid proof, they would have listed a cause in the definition. They don’t.
The definition of autism is a complete mess. It’s a hoax.
To be sure, there are MANY children who are severely damaged. No one is denying that. But why call it autism, if this pretense of a definition is all they have?
For example, for the children who are neurologically damaged by vaccines, call it what it is: VACCINE DAMAGE. That’s clear. It points directly to a cause. And we know that vaccines contain highly toxic metals. Aluminum, for example. Mercury, another poison, hasn’t been totally eliminated from some vaccines. There are other chemicals in vaccines, such as formaldehyde, which are toxic.
Obviously, using the label, autism, covers up the fact that vaccines have been doing great damage to children. Using the term autism obscures the fact that vaccine manufacturers are criminally liable, and potentially on the hook for hundreds of billions of dollars in law suits.
If a child has been damaged by exposure to, say, pesticides, call that what it is: PESTICIDE DAMAGE. Don’t try to hide the fact under the autism label.
Notice that in these two cases, vaccine and pesticide damage, we’re not talking about a disease at all. The word disease becomes another cover story to conceal real causes and real perpetrators.
If a child was struck on the head with a heavy object and sustained serious damage, and the doctor told his mother the child had suddenly contracted a disease called X, the insane absurdity of the “diagnosis” would be obvious to one and all. Well, that’s the situation here, with autism.
Don’t try to use a term (autism) to cover up the fact that the cause of the damage was clear in MANY instances. It was a “heavy object” called a vaccine, or a pesticide, or some other direct destructive force.
If anything is criminal, THIS is criminal. At the highest level.
Jon’s Blog has been shutdown. So I will post some of his posts I receive via email.
This article is very relevant today, as the UK votes in the European Union MEP election. The EU, a big/super state project of US/European corporatists!
Wall Street funded the NAZIS via Bank of International Settlement (BIS). NAZI supra-national corporartists envisioned the EU.
Most of my readers now know that my blog has been taken down by WordPress for no stated reason. We are working to restore the blog “by other means.” You’re reading this either because you’re already subscribed to my email list or someone forwarded this email to you. If you’re in the latter category, then the best way to get my daily articles is go to NoMoreFakeNews.com and sign up for the email list in the upper left corner. You’ll get articles in your inbox. Thank you for your support.
“Ah, yes. Utopia. You see perfection, i see mediocracy. You see triumph, I see surface gloss and shiny objects and moths drawn to luminous signs and symbols. You see order, I see walled-in compartments. You see community, I see the abdication of the soul.” (From my Notes on Technocratic Utopia)
In early human societies, technology was primitive, and top-down control over the population was overt and menacing.
In modern times, technology develops apart from massive political power—or it seems to.
Large numbers of people who work with technology view it as a path to perfection of civilization. Perfection equals order, organization, coordination, comfort, security, and so on. Or as one technocrat put it to me, “Everyone and everything in its proper place.”
If you don’t examine what that means, if you just take it as a surface generalization, and if you dream technology can solve all problems, the future looks rosy.
You can even flesh out details of the future. Buckminster Fuller did. He proposed that technology had reached a point where every human on Earth could be guaranteed, from birth, at no charge, the essentials of life: food, clothing, shelter, education.
There are many versions of a technocratic utopia. They all promise a collective triumph for the human species. Continue reading Who is going to run a perfect world?
“My name is Terry Davis Newman I’m a real person you can google me my doctor’s predicted. I would die in November 2016 of terminal stage for ovarian cancer specifically high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovaries and uterus it degraded and recurred as peritoneal carcinomatosis and this cancer has no survivors it doubles in size every six weeks
my sister and I both carried the Braca one gene and she died with the same cancer on the 18th of November of 2015 90 days before I was most it was the chemotherapy which they billed her more than $700,000 to pay for that killed her from 11 months after her diagnosis, this was after she was horribly mutilated with a double radical mastectomy and a hysterectomy
she bled to death in front of both of my elderly parents when her esophagus ruptured from chemo induced vomiting 50% of the people who have cancer died from the chemotherapy not the cancer there are over a hundred specific research papers that say peritoneal carcinomatosis following high-grade serous carcinoma is not helped or even affected by chemotherapy and that there’s no point to it other than that chemotherapy is a huge moneymaker for the oncologist my sister was murdered for profit the doctors knew the chemo would kill her and they knew it wouldn’t help her and that didn’t stop them her obituary is on legacy.com her name is Laurie Sutcliffe”
Twitter has launched a new search tool to combat the spread of misinformation about vaccines on the social network.
Users will now be prompted to visit a credible public health resource when they search on Twitter for certain keywords related to vaccines, Twitter said in a blog post Friday. In the US, Twitter has partnered with the Department of Health and Human Services to direct users to the agency’s Vaccines.gov.
A search for the word “vaccines,” for example, generates a message at the top of users’ feeds that says “To make sure you get the best information on vaccinations, resources are available from the US Department of Health & Human Services.”
The new tool comes as tech companies face mounting pressure from lawmakers, activists and health experts to prevent anti-vax misinformation from going viral. The misinformation may have contributed to an outbreak of measles in the US.
Other tech companies have also beefed up their efforts to combat misinformation about vaccines. Facebook said in March it would demote the ranking of groups or pages that spread misinformation about vaccines on its News Feed and in search results. Pinterest blocked anti-vaccination searches and has tried to pull down anti-vax content. In February, YouTube said it would remove ads from videos that feature anti-vaccination content.
Note: Do these pro-vaxxers think this will stop criticism of vaccines? Their attempts at censorship on social media (modern book burning), simply highlight their “faith” in vaccines. Real science is NEVER afraid of criticism.
Here is a question for the pro-vaxxers and their drug pushing Big Pharma corporatists: How many vaccines is too many for a child/teenager? 50 before age 16? 100 maybe? What is the upper, sustainable limit? At what number does the toxic/foreign body load become counter-productive?
Lyn Thyer Extradition Hearing Part 2
The Royal Courts of Justice
10AM Thursday 28th March 2019
The Strand, London WC2A 2LL
“The British CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) could NOT find any justifiable reason to bring charges against Lyn…the french equivalent of MHRA decided they would attempt to extradite Lyn”
Links to related articles:
LYN THYER (GCMAF) EXTRADITION HEARING
This blog was started as a direct result of the lies and corruption of the medical cartel. The medical mafia is international and involves a “faith” in certain medical orthodoxies.
The Ebola pandemic of 2014/2015 evoked feelings of disgust and contempt when I realised that simpler, quicker, healthier solutions were available to deal with the pandemic. Looking deeper, led to resource and geopolitical manouverings involving Africom and the covert globalist agenda. These are assertions which you reader will have to check yourself.
Zika has given us all another chance to observe the gobal collusion of governments, academic bodies, experts and transnational entities dumping a turd on humanity. Less than 13% of Brazil’s microcephaly cases tested positive for zika fragments, yet WHO, CDC, Harvard, Oxford, BBC, CNN, US and UK governments push the intellectual fraud of zika causality or concern. Is this not a conspiracy?
Why the unrelenting desire to impose medical authority via the World Health Organisation, especially when W.H.O. is beholden to its donors? If the donors set the agenda, what do they want? Rockefeller and now Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are sponsors of some grotesque, monopolistic ideas regarding life and its commercialisation.Documenting DNA does not justify owning the patent(monopoly) to that observed and recorded fragment of life. Tinkering with food and insects to create patent protected monopoloies of plant and life forms is indeed a perversity!
What dysfunction of mind compels a human being towards monopoly? Control? Profit?
It would seem these perverse control freaks see competition as a sin, stupid, idiotic. How hypocritical that these oligarchs and technocrats push the “free market” ideology that they betray by desire for monopoly.
Some of these oligarchs, technocratic monopolists and controle freaks are recognisable: Steve Jobs, Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Rockfellers, Rothschilds. Independent researchers continue to expose for the public record the involvement of oligarchic families across the globe.
The technological control and surveillance enabled by Google, Facebook, Apple and Microsoft can be negated by non-use or limited use of their respective technologies.
How do you negate the statist policies masquarading as law when it is backed by deadly violence? Evidenced by BLM, FBI, militarised police.
How do we negate a global governance grab by corporations with TPP/TTIP/TISA for the benefit of dysfunctional human beings that “imagine” a homogenised and controlled populace? Their secret tribunals, agreements, kangaroo courts can only stand with our silence and or their global violence.
How do we negate the power of the statists and their pretentious agents? Do they not seek our legitamacy and consent? Do they not seek to mold or conform to public opinion?
How do you negate the fraud that is our money system? A swing back to the captured statist model? Brute Erdogan of Turkey or Mugabe of Zimbabwe shows a corrupt state is no better than the elite money-changers.
How do you negate the frauds of the medical cartel, vaccine pushers? Knowledge, facts, their rejection and assertion of our personal sovereignty?
We are aware of a lot of the frauds of the psycopaths and control freaks: medical, legal, political, financial, educational, historical but the challenge for truth and freedom lovers is “imagining” our own solutions, alternatives.
Let us imagine Our Own World Order (Disorder), on our earth, orbiting our sun, in a universe we are sailing through. Let us affirm the wonder of life and the cosmos. A wonder you may recall whilst looking at your beloved? What are you? Who are you? What animates that body of star matter? What is looking back at me? Did we create the world, to experience the world?
Could it be that after so many years of research, and so much money being spent, that the entire orthodox medical establishment has been wrong about AIDS, or even worse, has sought to profit from a system that it KNEW was flawed from the beginning?
“Peter Duesberg…what has he gained from his courageous stand? He doesn’t have a laboratory. I think lesser scientists see that and will keep their mouths shut”