Tag Archives: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

AI and our health data: A pandemic threat to our privacy | The Listening Post

Note: Only the first 10 minutes relates to serious privacy concerns relating to the CIA, Palantir and faculty having access to medical records of NHS (UK) patients.

Epidemiology: Science or concocted numbers?

…epidemiology studies disease within a cultural context, and is particularly concerned with social organization. Epidemiology is, therefore, not only a bio-science but also a social science. Populations exist in a physical environment which is a dominant force in determining health. The study of life in relation to the environment is ecology (the word derives from the Greek for house), so epidemiology is, in addition, the science of the ecology of disease. The science of epidemiology,therefore,combines elements of biology,social sciences, and ecology:a bio-social-environmental science focusing on disease in populations.By its nature,epidemiology is multidisciplinary.The closest partner of the epidemiologist is the statistician

Concepts of Epidemiology – Raj Bhopal

Garbage in, Garbage out. So epidemiology therefore relies on ideas, theories which are then supported with their “data”, “formulas” or statistical calculations.

Challenge to the COVID-19 Medical Murderers

The title is indeed provacative but bear with me, I assert that this is exactly what is going on in some instances in the UK and US.

To prove or refute my assertion all the Medical Murderers practising euthanasia have to do is one very simple thing:

Publish the hospital treatment records of all COVID-19 deaths after seeking the consent from their next-of-kin.

All we wish to know are:

  • what medication/procedure
  • when
  • why ( symptoms promoting changes)

That’s it. Very simple. Openly publish what you did to each of these so called COVID-19 deaths.

An alternative for the privacy advocates, isa  meta analysis of these records to tabulate treatments, medications, procedures, symptoms, age and ethnicity. It should be very interesting.

CENTIVAX – Universal Vaccines


“However, rapidly mutating or naturally polymorphic pathogens of HIV, influenza, Chagas disease, sleeping sickness, Dengue and Zika continue to pose challenges to vaccine science. Our patented breakthrough epitope focusing technology, Centivax, focuses the immune response against conserved parts of pathogens that cannot mutate, enabling Universal Vaccine design

our influenza program works towards being applied to the $165M animal market and $3.2B human market, we also expand studies into other critical unmet needs, such as flaviviruses and HIV.”

A Vital Paper: David Crowe challenges the discovery of the COVID-19 virus

by Jon Rappoport

April 24, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

Canadian author and independent researcher, David Crowe, has spent several decades analyzing and torpedoing SPECIFICS of conventional medical research. At the deepest level.

I’m talking about, for example, the mainstream claims of discovering new viruses.

Crowe doesn’t lay on vague brushstrokes. He goes to the core of fabrications and exposes them, chapter and verse.

His new paper, which he continues to update and expand, is: “Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory”.

Here I quote from the section of his paper where he takes up the question of discovery—have researchers actually found a new virus which they assert is the cause of a new pandemic, COVID-19?

At the end of this article, I list the published papers Crowe refers to by number, as he takes apart the very basis of the COVID illusion.

David Crowe: “Scientists are detecting novel RNA in multiple patients with pneumonia-like conditions, and are assuming that the detection of RNA (which is believed to be wrapped in proteins to form an RNA virus, as coronaviruses are believed to be) is equivalent to isolation of the virus. It is not, and one of the groups of scientists was honest enough to admit this”:

“’we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood’” [2]

“But, despite this admission, earlier in the paper they repeatedly referred to the 41 cases (out of 59 similar cases) that tested positive for this RNA as, ‘41 patients…confirmed to be infected with 2019-nCoV’.”

“Another paper quietly admitted that”:

“’our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates’” [1]

A Vital Paper: David Crowe challenges the discovery of the COVID-19 virus