Who is going to run a perfect world?

Jon’s Blog has been shutdown. So I will post some of his posts I receive via email.
This article is very relevant today, as the UK votes in the European Union MEP election. The EU, a big/super state project of US/European corporatists!
 Wall Street funded the NAZIS via Bank of International Settlement (BIS). NAZI  supra-national corporartists envisioned the EU.

---

Most of my readers now know that my blog has been taken down by WordPress for no stated reason. We are working to restore the blog “by other means.” You’re reading this either because you’re already subscribed to my email list or someone forwarded this email to you. If you’re in the latter category, then the best way to get my daily articles is go to NoMoreFakeNews.com and sign up for the email list in the upper left corner. You’ll get articles in your inbox. Thank you for your support.

“Ah, yes. Utopia. You see perfection, i see mediocracy. You see triumph, I see surface gloss and shiny objects and moths drawn to luminous signs and symbols. You see order, I see walled-in compartments. You see community, I see the abdication of the soul.” (From my Notes on Technocratic Utopia)

In early human societies, technology was primitive, and top-down control over the population was overt and menacing.

In modern times, technology develops apart from massive political power—or it seems to.

Large numbers of people who work with technology view it as a path to perfection of civilization. Perfection equals order, organization, coordination, comfort, security, and so on. Or as one technocrat put it to me, “Everyone and everything in its proper place.”

If you don’t examine what that means, if you just take it as a surface generalization, and if you dream technology can solve all problems, the future looks rosy.

You can even flesh out details of the future. Buckminster Fuller did. He proposed that technology had reached a point where every human on Earth could be guaranteed, from birth, at no charge, the essentials of life: food, clothing, shelter, education.

There are many versions of a technocratic utopia. They all promise a collective triumph for the human species.

Brexit: Jason Hunter the Hypocritical Psycopathic Remainer!

I came across one of Jason Hunter’s youtube videos. It did challenge my ideas on a no deal Brexit. I was initially keen to delve deeper into what he had to say but this particular talk on youtube showed clearly what we a dealing with: A psychopathic, smug, hypocritical EUphile.

Firstly, Jason does point out factually the pitiful inadequacy of the Rt Hon Theresa May’s cabinet and the civil service regarding Brexit. On this I have to agree with him.
The facts or allusions to them cannot be denied. There are hundreds of treaties which must be recreated. Jason mentions 750.
Jason Hunter makes no pretense at being impartial, neither do I. He wants the referendum result revoked due to fraud by leave campaigners. He even throws in Russian collusion via social media bots.
What nonsense. Any criticism of the west is classed as Russian collusion. Are the Russians persecuting Lyn Thyer or David Noakes for making GcMaf or mandating vaccines?
Back to this hypocrite, Jason Hunter. Let us use his own words to expose his motivations and psychopathy or not:

Let us contrast two statements Jason makes in this video. Concern for people losing their jobs, incomes.
@12:25

“jobs, is jobs, is jobs, its not, its households. It’s people. Real people lives, real people incomes, real peoples mortgage payments, that’s what we’re talking about”

Versus, what he did for a large steel company
@15:51

“For several years, I was head of strategic planning for a very large steel company and we’d pick another country’s industry, say an automotive and we want to sell them flat steel…
once we’ve destroyed that competitor, we have that market all to ourselves for the next 5, 10, 15 years…”

He was not concerned about “people’s” jobs or incomes when his steel employer destroyed their competitor however due to Brexit he is concerned for destroyed jobs and companies.
He accepts capital’s exploitative predation and psychopathy when they(he) is the predator but not when he or the UK are victims of that same predation.

@25:40

“The EU are pulling their hair out, we’ve got back channels over there, we talk to them regularly”

@28:00

“We’ve talked with some of the leading drug manufacturers here in the UK, we talked with GlaxoSmithKline, talked to AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson…the big four if you like and they consult with the government”

– GlaxoSmithKline (make Cervarix HPV vaccine)
– AstraZeneca UK (make Fluenz Tetra flu vaccine)
– Johnson & Johnson (researching HIV/Ebola vaccines)

He has back-channels to the EU that openly disclose confidential activity between UK government ministers and the EU. It clearly show a strange level of intimacy to my mind. From what I gather, he has negotiated “trade deals” for companies NOT nation-states, so why does he have this degree of intimate access to Brussels and pharma?

The real deceit by this man, as he positions it as a rational choice, is to “pause” Brexit by revoking Article 50! I say it is a deceit because he must know once Brexit is stopped by revoking the divorce document (article 50), the political will for Brexit evaporates. Neither party will ever initiate the Brexit process ever again!. Real Brexiteers are in the minority in parlimanent.

Jason Hunter is still worth listening to for a dose of Brexit reality. However are his views consistent with someone truly concerned for liberty, “democracy”, or rejection of capital’s priests/oligarchs and their psychopathy?

The Joker (Trump) will reform or eliminate corrupt US Institutions?

We have Trump as the winner of the “Consenting to the lesser evil” election.

Will the drug dealing, regime changing CIA be abolished?
How about the NSA, who or what does it serve, certainly not the US people?
Will Trump audit the Federal Reserve or even abolish it?
Will Trump prosecute all executives and traders that were involved in fraud – simple financial deceits?
The joker will still rely on the inherently deceitful BAR members of the legal profession. Oh, have I gone to far? Then reader why does this profession obfuscate its assumptions, procedures, principles and maxims?
Why do BAR members continue the deceit that law can and only be practised by their licensed members?

How about Trump prosecutes fraud or collusion in the following bodies:
CDC – deceiving public about vaccine safety
FCC – hiding wireless risks to health
FDA – collusion with GMO producers

Why do we still need the TSA or Homeland security? Will the “lesser evil” Trump repeal the Patriot Act.
How about a public inquiry into the IRS and whether its can lawfully collect taxes.
Democrats, Republicans, Senate, Congress, you wish to drain the swamp? Start there!

I had a simple test for that other “lesser evil”, Nobel peace prize winner, Obama: Close down Guantanamo bay. He failed and proved to be a lackey of the globalists lunatics.

Will Trump initiate a national debate about electoral reform and direct democracy? Jon Rappoport mentioned Trump “livestreaming” straight to the public, asking their opinions.

The entertainment and news media are corrupt corporatists – 3 brass monkeys – see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil

Is Donald aware of the cultural shift required in the aggregate of Americans for a change? Infantilism in Hollywood films is profitable. Trump will not change that.

Trade agreements? You did not like NAFTA? Well Trump, here is my test for you: Reject TPP/TTIP/CETA/TISA.

Initiate an international, open and recorded discussion on real Trade not pretentions “free trade” zones.

How about a discussion on land and property rights? Are we, “transient beings” on this planet, custodians or owners of the earth resources? How does a group of people calling themselves government (statists) appropriate the right to use violence to acquire land? Is there a time limit to void “ownership” acquired by violence or fraud?

How about an open, livestreamed debate on banking, monetary, debt reform?

Consenting to Evil: The American 2016 herding

The binary choice between lesser evils is still evil. We look back at the Hitler era and wonder how the educated and cultured germans fell for the ploys of hitler and co. We watch in real-time the corrupt media in lock step sell the turd of Hillary’s presidency. Trump is labeled anti-establishment whilst he has historical links to zionists, jesuits and even the clintons.

The murderous, psycopathic interests that gave us the false flag of 911 would not be threatented by a Trump presidency. Will the CIA, FBI, TSA, CDC, FCC, Federel reserve, BAR members, Papal knights be investigated or removed? Of course not!

The deceits and criminality are etched into many aspects of American life. Twice now the Federal Bereau of Incompetents has given Hillary the all clear. Banana republics and despots will be looking forward with gleefully cynicism to the utterances of the next US president.

Does your vote not give consent to an evil? Hillary’s continuation of Bush and Obama’s global thuggery and theft. Are Trump supporters aware his property empire is predicated on bankster loan frauds (money out of thin air). Will Trump reject the neocons and corporatists advisors?

Neither side cares for truth, as long as their “lesser evil” candidate wins.

African American have been slavish devotion to the Democratic gang and hence Hillary. Will Trump with his autocratic and corporatists tendencies benefit them? Where is the evidence of this in his coporate hiring and tenancy policies?
Is the binary choice an ethical choice? If the large undecided swung to a third party what would that mean? Does that give the reduced winner of the expected binary choice a mandate? No but it sends a clear signal that enough people have NOT been coralled like texas cattle into the Hillary or Trump camps. After that, they set a blaze of local, state activists fires.

Based on turnout at rallies, Trump has beaten Hillary. Will this popular landslide be enough? It is obvious that a computer voting system is open to fraud even with a paper audit trail. Yet this is deemed acceptable by the statists officials. Imagine a swing to a third party, how will that be massaged? What will the polls say?

Whilst we have been distracted by this farce , Obama allows Dakato land grabs, Isreal continues to blockade Gaza, Ethiopia continues killing Oromo people for their land, Syria’s dismemberment continues, Europe’s self inflicted migrant crisis continues, China and Russian continue to be provoked into another nonsensical war caused by lunatics at the helm of power.

Cowboys and cowgirls, herding the cattle! Obama’s “change” rhetoric is all the evidence you need to see the farce!  2008 was the first black president pasture/gambit/scam/con. Now we have the first woman and an ‘anti-establishment’ pastures.

CETA: Canadian PM Justin Trudeau Reveals He’s A NWO/Global 1% Poodle After All & Signs CETA Screwing Canadians Big Time

View original post

BREXIT: UK Column Exposes the psyop

Published on Jul 14, 2016

Brian Gerrish and Mike Robinson with today’s UK Column News, including:

START Orgiastic political bloodlust : a reshuffle for a rebranded Fascism
03:56 Newspapers ridicule PM & new Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson
05:02 Further unsavory characters to disgrace the British establishment
11:34 Smart Meters & the First Utility organisation : corporate intrigue
13:28 Big Society lies tied into origins of the deceptive ‘living wage’ con
14:37 Hillary “is like a sadistic nurse in a mental hospital…” : says Boris
16:41 Farewell to Oliver Letwin : the financier slave with a task finished
17:52 Brexit Minister David Davis proclaims relentless transnationalism
19:45 European Union : a totalitarian schematic to destroy real Nations
22:51 The full repeal of the 1972 European Communities Act is essential
24:32 An Enemy of Jeremy : the Ambitions of one devious Tom Watson
32:15 The Church of England apologises for sadistic Kendall House ring
35:23 Systematic child abuse blackmail throughout British halls of power
36:04 Role of Home Secretary May in State persecution of abuse victims
38:14 Transhumanism Rising : sinister developments in tech & contracts

Brexit: Will the Queen betray her Trust?

A leading and inflammatory question? Yes, indeed, Brexit is that serious!

It rests on simple ideas. We are informed or rather the narrative is that the Queen is the protector of the interests of the common man in Great Britain and some commonwealth countries. She swore to this in her coronation oath:

” Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
…
Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements”
The Queen’s Coronation Oath 1953

We also note that the Queen leads the privy council of which the Prime Minister and his opposition are members. This acknowledes a deference to the Queen.

What happens in the following scenario:

The “sovereign” parliamentarians ignore the electorate by delays, obfuscations and rejection of the EU referendum.

In negating the will of the electorate the “sovereign” parliamentarians have relinquished their delegated right to govern.

The Queen is called on to consent to acts and statutes passed by a parliament that has lost its consent from the electorate.

The Queen can betray her stewardship and oath to ceremoniously consent or she can state that she cannot consent to “laws” brought forth by a parliament having lost its authority, goodwill and consent from the public.

Then there are the mundane and legal conceptions of Trust.

In the diagram let us say the “government” is the Trustee, if the People are the settlors and the Queen is the protector? Has she not failed in her duty?

I would contend that a can of putrid worms will be opened should “sovereign” parliamentarians decide to betray their trust!

Please feel free to rip apart my logic, omissions, mistakes. I look forward to an interesting debate or discussion on the constitutional implications of any betrayal of the Brexit result for the UK and the Queen.

Image: Wikipedia

Brexit: Hedge Funds’ Private Exit Polls

“There will be no public exit polls, but the hedge fund industry are rumored to be holding exit polls to get an early indication of the result. “

https://www.tradingfloor.com/posts/rain-private-polls-the-last-brexit-question-marks-7814014

“Hedge funds, it appears, have been commissioning private exit polls so they can get an edge in currency trading before the official result of Britain’s vote on EU membership is announced. In the absence of published exit polls, the rest of us will be watching the foreign exchange markets for clues. To anyone considering a punt on sterling on referendum day, though, the advice should be: don’t try this at home.”

FT – don’t bother it’s paywalled
Forbes: The Fascinating Economics Of The Hedge Funds’ Private Brexit Exit Polls

Polling companies have told the Financial Times that demand is high for their services on referendum day.

“Hedge funds have asked for exit polls and for hourly polls on the day,” one pollster said.

“Banks are certainly commissioning polls for their own consumption that are never released.”

The cost of an exit poll, where researchers record votes electronically and send them to headquarters, is around £500,000 (US$730,000) – much lower than the potential profits available from finding out whether Leave or Remain is likely to win, according to the newspaper.

Betting odds have suggested the chances of a Remain victory are as high as 80 percent.

RT: The Big Brexit Short: Hedge funds’ exit polls could move markets & predict outcome

NO!

Brexit: Up yours EU!!

Note: The sentiment is entirely mine. The EU is merely a step in the climb to control humanity for a tiny group’s own selfish, greedy psychopathic benefit!
The criminal ruling cabal has facilitated the monstrous corruption of many aspects of western endeavour. You name it? Religion, economics, medicine, health, food, housing, sovereignty, morality, politics, science, entertainment, gender, sexuality, education, politics, law, history, race relations…
To watch modern statists – Cameron, Corbyn, Blair, Major, Brown – hide or avoid the deceits of Ted Heath in hitching the UK to the globalist EU agenda is to invite contempt.