Tag Archives: Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

The Joker (Trump) will reform or eliminate corrupt US Institutions?

We have Trump as the winner of the “Consenting to the lesser evil” election.

Will the drug dealing, regime changing CIA be abolished?
How about the NSA, who or what does it serve, certainly not the US people?
Will Trump audit the Federal Reserve or even abolish it?
Will Trump prosecute all executives and traders that were involved in fraud – simple financial deceits?
The joker will still rely on the inherently deceitful BAR members of the legal profession. Oh, have I gone to far? Then reader why does this profession obfuscate its assumptions, procedures, principles and maxims?
Why do BAR members continue the deceit that law can and only be practised by their licensed members?

How about Trump prosecutes fraud or collusion in the following bodies:
CDC – deceiving public about vaccine safety
FCC – hiding wireless risks to health
FDA – collusion with GMO producers

Why do we still need the TSA or Homeland security? Will the “lesser evil” Trump repeal the Patriot Act.
How about a public inquiry into the IRS and whether its can lawfully collect taxes.
Democrats, Republicans, Senate, Congress, you wish to drain the swamp? Start there!

I had a simple test for that other “lesser evil”, Nobel peace prize winner, Obama: Close down Guantanamo bay. He failed and proved to be a lackey of the globalists lunatics.

Will Trump initiate a national debate about electoral reform and direct democracy? Jon Rappoport mentioned Trump “livestreaming” straight to the public, asking their opinions.

The entertainment and news media are corrupt corporatists – 3 brass monkeys – see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil

Is Donald aware of the cultural shift required in the aggregate of Americans for a change? Infantilism in Hollywood films is profitable. Trump will not change that.

Trade agreements? You did not like NAFTA? Well Trump, here is my test for you: Reject TPP/TTIP/CETA/TISA.

Initiate an international, open and recorded discussion on real Trade not pretentions “free trade” zones.

How about a discussion on land and property rights? Are we, “transient beings” on this planet, custodians or owners of the earth resources? How does a group of people calling themselves government (statists) appropriate the right to use violence to acquire land? Is there a time limit to void “ownership” acquired by violence or fraud?

How about an open, livestreamed debate on banking, monetary, debt reform?

Consenting to Evil: The American 2016 herding

The binary choice between lesser evils is still evil. We look back at the Hitler era and wonder how the educated and cultured germans fell for the ploys of hitler and co. We watch in real-time the corrupt media in lock step sell the turd of Hillary’s presidency. Trump is labeled anti-establishment whilst he has historical links to zionists, jesuits and even the clintons.

The murderous, psycopathic interests that gave us the false flag of 911 would not be threatented by a Trump presidency. Will the CIA, FBI, TSA, CDC, FCC, Federel reserve, BAR members, Papal knights be investigated or removed? Of course not!

The deceits and criminality are etched into many aspects of American life. Twice now the Federal Bereau of Incompetents has given Hillary the all clear. Banana republics and despots will be looking forward with gleefully cynicism to the utterances of the next US president.

Does your vote not give consent to an evil? Hillary’s continuation of Bush and Obama’s global thuggery and theft. Are Trump supporters aware his property empire is predicated on bankster loan frauds (money out of thin air). Will Trump reject the neocons and corporatists advisors?

Neither side cares for truth, as long as their “lesser evil” candidate wins.

African American have been slavish devotion to the Democratic gang and hence Hillary. Will Trump with his autocratic and corporatists tendencies benefit them? Where is the evidence of this in his coporate hiring and tenancy policies?
Is the binary choice an ethical choice? If the large undecided swung to a third party what would that mean? Does that give the reduced winner of the expected binary choice a mandate? No but it sends a clear signal that enough people have NOT been coralled like texas cattle into the Hillary or Trump camps. After that, they set a blaze of local, state activists fires.

Based on turnout at rallies, Trump has beaten Hillary. Will this popular landslide be enough? It is obvious that a computer voting system is open to fraud even with a paper audit trail. Yet this is deemed acceptable by the statists officials. Imagine a swing to a third party, how will that be massaged? What will the polls say?

Whilst we have been distracted by this farce , Obama allows Dakato land grabs, Isreal continues to blockade Gaza, Ethiopia continues killing Oromo people for their land, Syria’s dismemberment continues, Europe’s self inflicted migrant crisis continues, China and Russian continue to be provoked into another nonsensical war caused by lunatics at the helm of power.

Cowboys and cowgirls, herding the cattle! Obama’s “change” rhetoric is all the evidence you need to see the farce!  2008 was the first black president pasture/gambit/scam/con. Now we have the first woman and an ‘anti-establishment’ pastures.

BREXIT: UK Column Exposes the psyop

Published on Jul 14, 2016

Brian Gerrish and Mike Robinson with today’s UK Column News, including:

START Orgiastic political bloodlust : a reshuffle for a rebranded Fascism
03:56 Newspapers ridicule PM & new Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson
05:02 Further unsavory characters to disgrace the British establishment
11:34 Smart Meters & the First Utility organisation : corporate intrigue
13:28 Big Society lies tied into origins of the deceptive ‘living wage’ con
14:37 Hillary “is like a sadistic nurse in a mental hospital…” : says Boris
16:41 Farewell to Oliver Letwin : the financier slave with a task finished
17:52 Brexit Minister David Davis proclaims relentless transnationalism
19:45 European Union : a totalitarian schematic to destroy real Nations
22:51 The full repeal of the 1972 European Communities Act is essential
24:32 An Enemy of Jeremy : the Ambitions of one devious Tom Watson
32:15 The Church of England apologises for sadistic Kendall House ring
35:23 Systematic child abuse blackmail throughout British halls of power
36:04 Role of Home Secretary May in State persecution of abuse victims
38:14 Transhumanism Rising : sinister developments in tech & contracts

Brexit: Will the Queen betray her Trust?

A leading and inflammatory question? Yes, indeed, Brexit is that serious!

It rests on simple ideas. We are informed or rather the narrative is that the Queen is the protector of the interests of the common man in Great Britain and some commonwealth countries. She swore to this in her coronation oath:

” Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements
The Queen’s Coronation Oath 1953

We also note that the Queen leads the privy council of which the Prime Minister and his opposition are members. This acknowledes a deference to the Queen.

What happens in the following scenario:

The “sovereign” parliamentarians ignore the electorate by delays, obfuscations and rejection of the EU referendum.

In negating the will of the electorate the “sovereign” parliamentarians have relinquished their delegated right to govern.

The Queen is called on to consent to acts and statutes passed by a parliament that has lost its consent from the electorate.

The Queen can betray her stewardship and oath to ceremoniously consent or she can state that she cannot consent to “laws” brought forth by a parliament having lost its authority, goodwill and consent from the public.

Then there are the mundane and legal conceptions of Trust.chart_of_a_trust

In the diagram let us say the “government” is the Trustee, if the People are the settlors and the Queen is the protector? Has she not failed in her duty?

I would contend that a can of putrid worms will be opened should “sovereign” parliamentarians decide to betray their trust!

Please feel free to rip apart my logic, omissions, mistakes. I look forward to an interesting debate or discussion on the constitutional implications of any betrayal of the Brexit result for the UK and the Queen.

Image: Wikipedia

Brexit: Hedge Funds’ Private Exit Polls

“There will be no public exit polls, but the hedge fund industry are rumored to be holding exit polls to get an early indication of the result. “

https://www.tradingfloor.com/posts/rain-private-polls-the-last-brexit-question-marks-7814014

“Hedge funds, it appears, have been commissioning private exit polls so they can get an edge in currency trading before the official result of Britain’s vote on EU membership is announced. In the absence of published exit polls, the rest of us will be watching the foreign exchange markets for clues. To anyone considering a punt on sterling on referendum day, though, the advice should be: don’t try this at home.”

FT – don’t bother it’s paywalled
Forbes: The Fascinating Economics Of The Hedge Funds’ Private Brexit Exit Polls

Polling companies have told the Financial Times that demand is high for their services on referendum day.

“Hedge funds have asked for exit polls and for hourly polls on the day,” one pollster said.

“Banks are certainly commissioning polls for their own consumption that are never released.”

The cost of an exit poll, where researchers record votes electronically and send them to headquarters, is around £500,000 (US$730,000) – much lower than the potential profits available from finding out whether Leave or Remain is likely to win, according to the newspaper.

Betting odds have suggested the chances of a Remain victory are as high as 80 percent.

RT: The Big Brexit Short: Hedge funds’ exit polls could move markets & predict outcome