Tag Archives: Brexit

Questions for the “sovereign” parliamentarians

After Brexit’s turmoil within the political bubble, we see a return to the usual obfuscations.
Theresa May stated, Brexit means Brexit. A meaningless phrase. In our desperation to see the statists acknowledge the dissent of 17.4 million brits, we assumed it was her promise.

However, we begin to wonder about the disconnect between the electorate, party members and the Westminster parliamentarians. Labour, Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and even the Scottish Nationalists  leant towards staying in the EU.

Chart showing MPs backing the leave or remain camps

Direct questioning of these elected representative is now essential preferably in person. To that end here are some questions to size up their integrity:

  • Why do we borrow money with interest from the Bank of England when alternatives like the Bradbury pound exists?
  • Why are the allegations of child abuse and satanic ritual abuse not fully investigated and prosecuted? UK Column links and Zurich Insurance Behind Child Sex Abuse Investigation Shutdown?
  • If the Queen has no discretion in consenting to statutes passed by the parliament, why do we still need this ceremonial consent?
  • Why does the Crown Corporation (City of London) have a permanent unelected “Remembrancer” in the Houses of Parliament?
  • Would they resign having lost the backing of their constituency especially in relation to Brexit?
  • Will they vote to repeal the European Communities Act 1972?
  • Does the existence of the Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 disprove that vaccines are safe?
  • The US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been caught twice lying about its data (Swine flu data scrubbed and MMR study distorted). Does the MMR fraud not warrant a criminal prosecution of the officers of Merck, the makers of the MMR vaccine?
  • Is it ethical and lawful to impose an agreement like the TTIP, arrived at in secrecy upon the public?
  • Is it ethical and lawful to impose a private, corporate court upon a nation state as envisaged in the ISDS?
  • Is it ethical or lawful to grant statutory immunity to the Bank of International Settlements, the IMF, Bank of England and the Federal Reserve? Are these bodies above the “law”?  Where is the equality before the “law”?
  • Are there any rights that cannot be violated by the state? If there are none, then what rights do states claim to protect?
  • If the nation state does not serve the common man/woman, whom does it serve and why are we compelled to honour or consent to their interests?

Let’s call them litmus test questions. The MPs squirming, blathering will clearly show their affiliations. 17.4 Million Brexiteers have questions for their local MPs.
Updated:  14/08/2016

BREXIT: UK Column Exposes the psyop

Published on Jul 14, 2016

Brian Gerrish and Mike Robinson with today’s UK Column News, including:

START Orgiastic political bloodlust : a reshuffle for a rebranded Fascism
03:56 Newspapers ridicule PM & new Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson
05:02 Further unsavory characters to disgrace the British establishment
11:34 Smart Meters & the First Utility organisation : corporate intrigue
13:28 Big Society lies tied into origins of the deceptive ‘living wage’ con
14:37 Hillary “is like a sadistic nurse in a mental hospital…” : says Boris
16:41 Farewell to Oliver Letwin : the financier slave with a task finished
17:52 Brexit Minister David Davis proclaims relentless transnationalism
19:45 European Union : a totalitarian schematic to destroy real Nations
22:51 The full repeal of the 1972 European Communities Act is essential
24:32 An Enemy of Jeremy : the Ambitions of one devious Tom Watson
32:15 The Church of England apologises for sadistic Kendall House ring
35:23 Systematic child abuse blackmail throughout British halls of power
36:04 Role of Home Secretary May in State persecution of abuse victims
38:14 Transhumanism Rising : sinister developments in tech & contracts

Brexit: At Last, a Jewish Prime Minister?

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/2016/7/11/at-last-a-jewish-prime-minister
theresa may je suis juif
“Jews in Britain and Israel are over the moon with Theresa May becoming the British prime minister.

The Israeli Ynet describes May as “Israel’s true friend.”

The JC reports that May has worked closely with the Community Security Trust, a Jewish organisation that cares for the security of one ethnic group that believes itself to be chosen. May had committed another £13.4 million of government money to Jewish security measures and had made her intentions towards the community clear.”

Public Notice to World Despots: US and UK drop their facade

June 6th 2016
This a public notice to all tinpot dictators labelled as such by the west.

We hereby inform your excellencies that we are dropping any further pretence of being morally superior. We have conceded we are and have been hypocrites of the highest order in our claims of following the “rule of law” or practising “democracy”

We wish to give special notice to the following despots: Mugabe of Zimbabwe, Basher al-Assad of Syria, Kim Jong-II of N. Korea, Yoweri Museveni of Uganda, Vladimir Putin of Russia and  Teodoro Mbasogo Equitorial Guinea that though they have been singled out for particular notice their actions are in conformity with the corrupt actions of the US and UK over the past 20 years.

To a certain extent we were no longer able to competently maintain the charade, so often we outwitted ourselves and the plebiscites saw behind the curtain.

A case in point is Brexit. The plebs voted to leave the European Union on the 23rd June 2016. We are currently stalling for time to seek ways to invalidate the will of the plebiscites. God knows we will not be asking them any important questions in the future.

We have tried to give Queen Elizabeth II and the Pope the ability to claim ignorance of our deceits and despotism but unfortunately by their ceremonial consents they are complicit in  our despotism masked with displays of “democracy” or pious deference.

It requires less effort and sophistry to be openly corrupt, criminal, duplicitous and murderous in pursuit of our interests and the management of our human income generating stock.

If you seek further evidence of our hypocrisy reflect on our US FBI investigators agreeing that Hilary Clinton was grossly negligent in her duties as foreign secretary however as a member of our network, she will not get even a slap on the wrist or cheek. A “citizen” can expect the  whole statute book to be thrown at them.

We concede that this open display of contempt for “the rule of law” will require overt violence however we have built up the apparatus of the police and surveillance state incrementally whilst the plebiscites were occupied with Game of Thrones, X factor or their favourite sporting spectacle.

We may share some tricks of the trade in state-craft in the event you are bored and decide to practise some sophistry. Take the Chilcot Report, you will note the long duration and polite language for what was really our criminal destruction and exploitation of Iraq. We made sure Right Honourable Anthony Blair is well paid and protected for his good work in furthering our interests.

Another trick of the trade is to make your citizens dependent directly on the state for income or indirectly via state to corporate handouts. The plebiscites will consent to your actions despite knowing better. Scaring them with bogus bogeymen also works, you can position yourself as the strong person protecting the flock.

We know you will find it increasingly difficult to restrain wild laughter whenever we mention “law”, “democracy”, “human rights” however these platitudes sound good on TV and make for fabricated historical records as to current events.

The only thing we fear from the plebiscite, is that enough of them put their petty irritations of race, sexuality, religion aside and focus their time, effort, thoughts and imagination in nullifying our control. It is a fear but very remote as we have spent the past 4 decades poisoning their food and water, misinforming , debilitating their ranks. Our medical wing have created the perfect cover for our eugenics in the vaccine!

It has been rough on you and yes we had to get rid of Saddam and Gaddafi for trying to upset our cartel but that’s water under the bridge, after all we are now openly despotic birds of a feather.

We therefore apologise to all prior tinpot dictators henceforth called His/Her Most Honourable Excellencies.

Let us rule without pretence and enjoy the infinite printing power of our moneyed accomplices.

Brexit: Historical Betrayals

Posted pending further checking: Anonymous Youtube link

Exposed. Who are the traitors and how did they betrayed us.
The abolition of Britain is illegal under the British Constitution, and the criminal acts of the Queen and her Ministers have included the worst acts of treason in history. They secretly repealed the treason laws in 1998 (hidden in s36.3 of the Crime and Disorder Act) to save their own necks. The criminality of our ministers and parliament won’t save us – the EU’s Constitution will automatically abolish the British one, and they will have got away with the greatest crime in a thousand years.List of Traitors to Scotland the United KingdomSince 1972 five European Union treaties have been signed abolishing our nation. As this is illegal under the British Constitution, our nation needed to be undermined with the methods listed below. The EU is succeeding exclusively through subversion by British traitors from inside the UK.The EU has the laws of a police state, and a constitution that hands absolute power to unelected dictators; it specifically hands all military power (and that includes the nuclear weapons of Britain and France,) to these dictators. It is the Soviet system, and creates a sham EU parliament with no power; it will abolish the nations of Great Britain and England.The list of traitors according to the severity of their crime:

Traitor number 1. HM the Queen. Has committed five acts of treason signing EU treaties that abolish our nation. She is the only monarch to have broken her Coronation oath. Failed as the ultimate check and balance, failed to insist on a national ballot for the abolition of our nation.

Traitor number 2. Edward Heath. Committed an act of treason by passing the 1972 EU Communities Act, which is the enabling act to abolish our nation. He then lied in his White Paper and in his speeches this Act would not abolish our sovereignty. He started the entire illegal EU process. The fact he was a lifelong member of the Deutsche VersicherungsDienst intelligence department was not discovered until his death.

Its very important to understand the legal basis for treason. Firstly it has always been the most serious crime on the statute book, worse than murder. Treason has long been the only crime punished by “hanging by the neck until dead.” Murderers only get life. The definition of treason is “a crime that undermines one’s government” or “the offence of acting to overthrow one’s government.” Philby, Maclean, Blunt, Burgess committed treason, by selling secrets to the Russians, and would have got perhaps 15 years if they had returned. What Heath did was the ultimate act of treason, not just undermining our nation, but abolishing it. If a court case had been brought, he would have got the ultimate penalty.

3. Tony Blair Committed three acts of treason, with three EU treaties. He is also an enthusiastic implementer of EU laws disguised as British laws, the latest being ID cards; he’s an enforcer of crippling EU regulations. Blair is the chief manufacturer of the EU police state in Britain (Scottish rite 33rd degree mason of Studholme lodge 1591 ).

4. John Major committed Treason with the Maastricht treaty; he also sold our main military and nuclear port, Devonport Dockyard, to Dick Cheney’s Haliburton Corporation for peanuts, his bribe was to be European MD of the Bush family’s Carlyle Weapons group, and $1 million pa for life, so he is definitely on the other side.

5. Margaret Thatcher committed Treason with the Single European Act. She is the only Prime minister who now regrets signing it. She’s still guilty – a murderer who apologises only has a mitigating circumstance. She’ll remain a traitor until her death. Like many top people on our side, she’s developed heart problems and is too ill to help.The above four people have all committed treason, and prosecutions were pending. Tony Blair’s risk was the full force of the law for signing the Amsterdam Treaty amongst others. But in a stunning abuse of power, Tony Blair secretly repealed the treason laws, hidden in the Crime and Disorder Act, and the Queen signed it in 1998, saving both their necks.There can be no worse criminal abuse of the law than this. …….To get off your own execution as a Prime Minister by repealing the law you are charged under……..The newspapers and media missed it entirely.

6. John Prescott, John Reid, Peter Mandleson, Alan Johnson, about a dozen, now cabinet ministers. Communists who’s allegiance in the 1960’s was to the Soviet Union, switched their loyalty to the European Union in the 1970’s; they’ve implemented the EU’s Frankfurt school subversion, and the 111,000 EU regulations that are criminalising us all. Took control of the Labour party away from patriotic traditionalists…

Additional link: List of Traitors to the United Kingdom

 

Brexit: Will the Queen betray her Trust?

A leading and inflammatory question? Yes, indeed, Brexit is that serious!

It rests on simple ideas. We are informed or rather the narrative is that the Queen is the protector of the interests of the common man in Great Britain and some commonwealth countries. She swore to this in her coronation oath:

” Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements
The Queen’s Coronation Oath 1953

We also note that the Queen leads the privy council of which the Prime Minister and his opposition are members. This acknowledes a deference to the Queen.

What happens in the following scenario:

The “sovereign” parliamentarians ignore the electorate by delays, obfuscations and rejection of the EU referendum.

In negating the will of the electorate the “sovereign” parliamentarians have relinquished their delegated right to govern.

The Queen is called on to consent to acts and statutes passed by a parliament that has lost its consent from the electorate.

The Queen can betray her stewardship and oath to ceremoniously consent or she can state that she cannot consent to “laws” brought forth by a parliament having lost its authority, goodwill and consent from the public.

Then there are the mundane and legal conceptions of Trust.chart_of_a_trust

In the diagram let us say the “government” is the Trustee, if the People are the settlors and the Queen is the protector? Has she not failed in her duty?

I would contend that a can of putrid worms will be opened should “sovereign” parliamentarians decide to betray their trust!

Please feel free to rip apart my logic, omissions, mistakes. I look forward to an interesting debate or discussion on the constitutional implications of any betrayal of the Brexit result for the UK and the Queen.

Image: Wikipedia