“They (the justices) have simply restored on a legal basis constitutionall principles that where previously a matter of political convention…it’s the job of the supreme court to determine what the constitutional rules are?”
– Lord Jonathan Sumption
The Justices have converted “Political Convention” into precedent law. They have given themselves the power/authority to intervene in future issues between parliamentarians and the executive branch of the state.
Their reasoning was the “extreme effect” of the prorogation. The justification was the effect of the government’s actions after the fact?
Have they now created a new principle? An act can be ruled ‘”unlawful” it it creates an “extreme effect” on society or statist mechanisms.
Here is the pretense of the Justices. Their ruling was a political choice, with political effects/ramifications. All 11 Justices were well aware of which side of the political divide their ruling would impact.
Lady Hale in her reading of their decision could have clearly stated their increased supervisory powers over the executive branch of the state. Why? It was televised for public consumption, hence clarity and brevity are important for easy comprehension of their reasoning and ruling.
No obfuscation. A direct, overt statement of their increased powers to intervene!
The vaccine pushers have the BBC and Sky News in the UK still telling lies about the efficacy and safety of vaccines. They both declared the official position without allowing competing viewpoints to be made.
The vaccine pushers are indemnified from any harm their products cause. Dear reader, ponder the situation. An amoral, profit driven corporation can produce some “vaccine” shite, fabricate their research, coerce national and supranational bodies to endorce their “vaccine” shite and the US government is their legal shield. If you were the said CEO or board of the drug pushing fictional corporate entity would you care about the quality or quantity of injected crap you put into your profitable mainly children or teenage victims/targets? A principled person would resign or refuse to work for a corporation engaged in such activity.
The key [public] topics for discussion this year are:
1. A Stable Strategic Order
2. What Next for Europe?
3. Climate Change and Sustainability
4. China (Ed note: faux enemy)
5. Russia (Ed note: faux enemy)
6. The Future of Capitalism
8. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
9. The Weaponisation of Social Media (Ed note: censorship/deplatforming)
10. The Importance of Space
11. Cyber Threats
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 2019 BOARD
Castries, Henri de (FRA), Chairman, Steering Committee; Chairman, Institut Montaigne
Kravis, Marie-Josée (USA), President, American Friends of Bilderberg Inc.; Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute
Halberstadt, Victor (NLD), Chairman Foundation Bilderberg Meetings; Professor of Economics, Leiden University
Achleitner, Paul M. (DEU), Treasurer Foundation Bilderberg Meetings; Chairman Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG Continue reading 67th Bilderberg: 30 May – 2 June 2019 in Montreux, Switzerland→
Jane is now the 3rd site I subcribe to, that is no longer available on WordPress. I do not know when exactly it was removed. It appears Jane is now blogging on the following platform: https://thefourthempire.blogspot.com/
Jane Burgermeister is a science journalist who filed criminal complaints with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) against the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations (UN), the United States government, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and several medical and pharmaceutical laboratories, most notably Baxter. The complaint accuses the organizations and their representatives of committing several felonies in connection with the Bioterrorism, with the attempted genocide, mass murder, the coercion of the constitutional bodies, high treason, among other charges
Note: WordPress has acted against “free speech”! It is a “mindful” act requiring human intervention either by code (algorithmic changes) or administrative removal.
This is highly presumptive but what the hell. Here are my suggestions to independent media activists/bloggers:
1) GET YOUR OWN EMAIL LIST OF SUBSCRIBERS
2) PLAN FOR YOUR TAKEDOWN – BACKUP YOUR SITES/DATA
3) START MULTI- BLOGGING – HAVE OTHER SITES
4) BE PLATFORM INDIFFERENT – THE MESSAGE IS THE KEY COMPONENT NOT WHERE IT IS HOSTED
5) RECOMMEND ALTERNATIVE SEARCH ENGINES TO “DO NO EVIL” AND “BINGO”
6) LET’S HAVE FUN CIRCUMVENTING THEIR DESPERATE CENSORSHIP – EVERY PLATFORM THAT COMPLIES, DECLARES ITS HOSTILITY TO HUMAN FREEDOM. LET’S ENJOY EXPOSING THE PRETENSIONS OF THE TECHNOCRATS.
Twitter has launched a new search tool to combat the spread of misinformation about vaccines on the social network.
Users will now be prompted to visit a credible public health resource when they search on Twitter for certain keywords related to vaccines, Twitter said in a blog post Friday. In the US, Twitter has partnered with the Department of Health and Human Services to direct users to the agency’s Vaccines.gov.
A search for the word “vaccines,” for example, generates a message at the top of users’ feeds that says “To make sure you get the best information on vaccinations, resources are available from the US Department of Health & Human Services.”
The new tool comes as tech companies face mounting pressure from lawmakers, activists and health experts to prevent anti-vax misinformation from going viral. The misinformation may have contributed to an outbreak of measles in the US.
Other tech companies have also beefed up their efforts to combat misinformation about vaccines. Facebook said in March it would demote the ranking of groups or pages that spread misinformation about vaccines on its News Feed and in search results. Pinterest blocked anti-vaccination searches and has tried to pull down anti-vax content. In February, YouTube said it would remove ads from videos that feature anti-vaccination content.
Note: Do these pro-vaxxers think this will stop criticism of vaccines? Their attempts at censorship on social media (modern book burning), simply highlight their “faith” in vaccines. Real science is NEVER afraid of criticism.
Here is a question for the pro-vaxxers and their drug pushing Big Pharma corporatists: How many vaccines is too many for a child/teenager? 50 before age 16? 100 maybe? What is the upper, sustainable limit? At what number does the toxic/foreign body load become counter-productive?
Jon’s blog is the second that has been taken down/offline on WordPress in the past two weeks that I subscribe or am aware off. I will take Jon over the western corporate media any day, we can now include tech/social media corporations in the pushing of the “official” duplicitious narratives. Was it not Jon that gave us the nugget that exposed the corporate cow-excrement that was Zika.
Interesting question, who else practised book burning? Inquisition, Nazis!
I say, “Dear Parents, All over the world they are injecting your children, from the day of their birth, with poisonous chemicals and germs, and they’re calling it a miracle. But it isn’t. It’s devastating.”
And then, someone somewhere behind a curtain who’s hidden his name-badge in his underpants says, “Censor that man. Cut off his expression. He has no right to say what he’s saying.”
The Soulless Ones are at it again.
Many of you now know that, last Saturday, WordPress took down my blog without warning or notice. After 10 years—boom. Gone. We are in the process of restoring the blog through “other means.” Meanwhile, my home page at NoMoreFakeNews.com is still up, and you can let others know to go there to sign up for the email list to receive my articles in their inbox on a regular basis. You can also order products at that same home page.
I strongly suspect that my articles criticizing vaccines triggered the censorship move. The justification would be: well, we must protect the health of the public and your influence could be quite negative in that regard, etc. Continue reading Jon Rappoport: THEY TOOK DOWN MY BLOG!→