10,000 troops from 13 countries arrive in the UK for major exercise

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/10000-troops-from-13-countries-arrive-in-the-uk-for-major-exercise
Published 14 March 2019

The UK will boost its defensive capabilities by hosting a major international military exercise for two weeks from 30 March 2019.
More than 10,000 military personnel, 35 warships, 5 submarines and 59 aircraft and helicopters from 13 countries will take part in Exercise Joint Warrior until 11 April.

The aim of Joint Warrior is to allow the UK’s Royal Navy, Army, Royal Air Force and their allies to conduct joint operations involving different forces and units and against a range of current and future threats
…
There following nations are taking part in Exercise Joint Warrior: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, the UK and the US.

Operation Yellowhammer
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47658403

“On operation yellowhammer, which is the emergency planning for a no-deal Brexit, it is beyond comprehension that any Prime Minister could knowingly allow the country to be eight days—about 200 hours—away from the possibility of crashing out of the European Union without a deal and to require that emergency planning work to be done”

– The First Minister (Nicola Sturgeon) on Yellowhammer

The question I have is: Why commit 10,000 troops during a key period of political change?

We should be leaving the EU at 11pm on Friday 29th and yet we have 10,000 troops in an exercise (cover) from 30th March to 11th April (two weeks)! As UK column pointed out, best to have foreign troops if you need to forcefully crack down on UK populace.

Would you want foreign troops diverting military resources during your contingency planning? Incompetence, over-confidence or worst case planning for unrest?

AV9 – Terry Boardman – Life After BREXIT : Britain … & the END of the EU!

We joined the EEC to get rich; are we now leaving the EU only in order to get rich by trading with Asia? To become even more subservient to the USA?

 

The Brexit Mess Planned All Along To Thwart The Will Of The People – David Icke

What are we to make of these Rt Honourable Oxbridge graduates, Tony Blair, David Cameron and Theresa May?

“May later attended the University of Oxford”

“he (Blair) enrolled for university at St John’s College, Oxford, reading Jurisprudence for three years”

“Cameron began his Bachelor of Arts course in Philosophy, Politics and Economics (PPE) at Brasenose College, Oxford”

They are  not stupid people, so this mess is intentional. I agree with David Icke totally on this. To engineer a Brexit deal worse that remaining in the EU takes some collusion by both parties – May and the EU.

Based on their compulsive lying in support of the EU we can be sure they serve their “hidden hand” masters, They are willing treacherous accomplices.

We can now add another lying treacherous scumbag to this group, privy council oath taker Jeremy Corbyn.

We can take note in December 2018 that 3 recent Prime Ministers being the recipients  of the best (once free) University education Britain has to offer are compliant before the TTIP/TPP corporatist pile of excrement called the European Union.

UK Column: Recommend Weekday viewing

https://www.youtube.com/user/ukcolumn

START Iraq Inquiry & Admiral West : ‘Some bastard told me to do it…’
2:32 Ellis – ‘It wasn’t about nuclear weapons. It was about currency.’
5:54 ‘a drive to connect Saddam to something we can pin him to…’
7:21 rationalisation of intelligence systems across the EU superstate
10:14 police receive internet record access in spite of data-breaches
13:01 NATO summit in Warsaw in provocative escalation context
16:17 ‘the Euro currency has failed’ – ‘currency reset’ via military
19:21 legitimate spheres of influence & the monetary Axis of Evil
21:58 agenda of ‘global monetary interests using military power’
22:23 ‘constant interference’ in the Scottish child abuse inquiry
24:01 Nicky Morgan launches a sinister ‘staying close’ scheme
28:22 ukcolumn breakdown of the establishment Abuse-rings
30:34 Mark Carney announces a grand scheme to fix Britain
34:23 the Missing Years of Oliver Letwin & New York links
38:05 ‘Parliamentary Labour Party is being ripped apart…’
40:41 Ken Loach & policy control at the time of the strikes
42:27 a one-party-State & ‘Oliver Letwin’s private fiefdom’
42:43 Nazi continuation plans & a European Book Review
45:59 ‘inflated thieving financial services’ & wild corruption
48:02 eurocrats signify disrespect whilst legal questions stand
49:57 ‘we need to elect six hundred & fifty independent MPs’
51:26 a German sovereignty movement picks up a little steam
53:48 shouts at a Minister of ‘Traitor! Traitor! Get out of here!’

Brexit: Will the Queen betray her Trust?

A leading and inflammatory question? Yes, indeed, Brexit is that serious!

It rests on simple ideas. We are informed or rather the narrative is that the Queen is the protector of the interests of the common man in Great Britain and some commonwealth countries. She swore to this in her coronation oath:

” Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
…
Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements”
The Queen’s Coronation Oath 1953

We also note that the Queen leads the privy council of which the Prime Minister and his opposition are members. This acknowledes a deference to the Queen.

What happens in the following scenario:

The “sovereign” parliamentarians ignore the electorate by delays, obfuscations and rejection of the EU referendum.

In negating the will of the electorate the “sovereign” parliamentarians have relinquished their delegated right to govern.

The Queen is called on to consent to acts and statutes passed by a parliament that has lost its consent from the electorate.

The Queen can betray her stewardship and oath to ceremoniously consent or she can state that she cannot consent to “laws” brought forth by a parliament having lost its authority, goodwill and consent from the public.

Then there are the mundane and legal conceptions of Trust.

In the diagram let us say the “government” is the Trustee, if the People are the settlors and the Queen is the protector? Has she not failed in her duty?

I would contend that a can of putrid worms will be opened should “sovereign” parliamentarians decide to betray their trust!

Please feel free to rip apart my logic, omissions, mistakes. I look forward to an interesting debate or discussion on the constitutional implications of any betrayal of the Brexit result for the UK and the Queen.

Image: Wikipedia