Jon’s Blog has been shutdown. So I will post some of his posts I receive via email.
This article is very relevant today, as the UK votes in the European Union MEP election. The EU, a big/super state project of US/European corporatists! Wall Street funded the NAZIS via Bank of International Settlement (BIS). NAZI supra-national corporartists envisioned the EU.
Most of my readers now know that my blog has been taken down by WordPress for no stated reason. We are working to restore the blog “by other means.” You’re reading this either because you’re already subscribed to my email list or someone forwarded this email to you. If you’re in the latter category, then the best way to get my daily articles is go to NoMoreFakeNews.com and sign up for the email list in the upper left corner. You’ll get articles in your inbox. Thank you for your support.
“Ah, yes. Utopia. You see perfection, i see mediocracy. You see triumph, I see surface gloss and shiny objects and moths drawn to luminous signs and symbols. You see order, I see walled-in compartments. You see community, I see the abdication of the soul.” (From my Notes on Technocratic Utopia)
In early human societies, technology was primitive, and top-down control over the population was overt and menacing.
In modern times, technology develops apart from massive political power—or it seems to.
Large numbers of people who work with technology view it as a path to perfection of civilization. Perfection equals order, organization, coordination, comfort, security, and so on. Or as one technocrat put it to me, “Everyone and everything in its proper place.”
If you don’t examine what that means, if you just take it as a surface generalization, and if you dream technology can solve all problems, the future looks rosy.
You can even flesh out details of the future. Buckminster Fuller did. He proposed that technology had reached a point where every human on Earth could be guaranteed, from birth, at no charge, the essentials of life: food, clothing, shelter, education.
Twitter has launched a new search tool to combat the spread of misinformation about vaccines on the social network.
Users will now be prompted to visit a credible public health resource when they search on Twitter for certain keywords related to vaccines, Twitter said in a blog post Friday. In the US, Twitter has partnered with the Department of Health and Human Services to direct users to the agency’s Vaccines.gov.
A search for the word “vaccines,” for example, generates a message at the top of users’ feeds that says “To make sure you get the best information on vaccinations, resources are available from the US Department of Health & Human Services.”
The new tool comes as tech companies face mounting pressure from lawmakers, activists and health experts to prevent anti-vax misinformation from going viral. The misinformation may have contributed to an outbreak of measles in the US.
Other tech companies have also beefed up their efforts to combat misinformation about vaccines. Facebook said in March it would demote the ranking of groups or pages that spread misinformation about vaccines on its News Feed and in search results. Pinterest blocked anti-vaccination searches and has tried to pull down anti-vax content. In February, YouTube said it would remove ads from videos that feature anti-vaccination content.
Note: Do these pro-vaxxers think this will stop criticism of vaccines? Their attempts at censorship on social media (modern book burning), simply highlight their “faith” in vaccines. Real science is NEVER afraid of criticism.
Here is a question for the pro-vaxxers and their drug pushing Big Pharma corporatists: How many vaccines is too many for a child/teenager? 50 before age 16? 100 maybe? What is the upper, sustainable limit? At what number does the toxic/foreign body load become counter-productive?
Jon’s blog is the second that has been taken down/offline on WordPress in the past two weeks that I subscribe or am aware off. I will take Jon over the western corporate media any day, we can now include tech/social media corporations in the pushing of the “official” duplicitious narratives. Was it not Jon that gave us the nugget that exposed the corporate cow-excrement that was Zika.
Interesting question, who else practised book burning? Inquisition, Nazis!
I say, “Dear Parents, All over the world they are injecting your children, from the day of their birth, with poisonous chemicals and germs, and they’re calling it a miracle. But it isn’t. It’s devastating.”
And then, someone somewhere behind a curtain who’s hidden his name-badge in his underpants says, “Censor that man. Cut off his expression. He has no right to say what he’s saying.”
The Soulless Ones are at it again.
Many of you now know that, last Saturday, WordPress took down my blog without warning or notice. After 10 years—boom. Gone. We are in the process of restoring the blog through “other means.” Meanwhile, my home page at NoMoreFakeNews.com is still up, and you can let others know to go there to sign up for the email list to receive my articles in their inbox on a regular basis. You can also order products at that same home page.
I strongly suspect that my articles criticizing vaccines triggered the censorship move. The justification would be: well, we must protect the health of the public and your influence could be quite negative in that regard, etc. Continue reading Jon Rappoport: THEY TOOK DOWN MY BLOG!→
The UK will boost its defensive capabilities by hosting a major international military exercise for two weeks from 30 March 2019.
More than 10,000 military personnel, 35 warships, 5 submarines and 59 aircraft and helicopters from 13 countries will take part in Exercise Joint Warrior until 11 April.
The aim of Joint Warrior is to allow the UK’s Royal Navy, Army, Royal Air Force and their allies to conduct joint operations involving different forces and units and against a range of current and future threats
There following nations are taking part in Exercise Joint Warrior: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, the UK and the US.
“On operation yellowhammer, which is the emergency planning for a no-deal Brexit, it is beyond comprehension that any Prime Minister could knowingly allow the country to be eight days—about 200 hours—away from the possibility of crashing out of the European Union without a deal and to require that emergency planning work to be done”
The question I have is: Why commit 10,000 troops during a key period of political change?
We should be leaving the EU at 11pm on Friday 29th and yet we have 10,000 troops in an exercise (cover) from 30th March to 11th April (two weeks)! As UK column pointed out, best to have foreign troops if you need to forcefully crack down on UK populace.
Would you want foreign troops diverting military resources during your contingency planning? Incompetence, over-confidence or worst case planning for unrest?
The Right Honorable Theresa May and Boris Johnson did not provide their evidence for the nerve agent debacle in Salisbury, near Porto Down. It was in line with previous lies about Russian interference in elections. The new lie, is that Bashar al-Assad’s government used chemical weapons.
Does Assad benefit from using chemical weapons knowing the West will use it as justification for further intervention? No!
Will the US/UK/Israel/NATO stage “violent acts” to further an agenda? Yes is the answer! The most brazen being 911. We have seen multiple staged events in the UK and European mainland since then.
Lies and deceit amongst the corporate, political and military leadership in the West can be taken as axiomatic. To profess a value whilst doing the exact opposite. What did we see in the movie Black Panther? An advanced nation sharing its technology and seeking to correct historical mistakes. A direct inversion of the reality of the US, UK, Australia and NATO members.
We can take the West’s humanitarian concern for chemical weapons use, as purely a ploy, a deceit to further their and Israel’s agenda. It is a transparent deceit once you know the “western leadership” cadre are pretentious concerning the “rule of law”.
We know the West (including Israel) has the inclination, history and motive to stage “terrorists acts” that further their supremacy, so claiming a chemical attack happened is a convenient excuse to coerce public support and project a false moral concern for Syrian citizens.
Reader you will recall the US used Depleted Uranium armaments in Iraq. A hazard to both its own troops and the local population. Does the long term “chemical poisoning” of the land and air by DU weapons concern these Western hypocrites? How about Israel’s continued brutish and genocidal behavior in Gaza? How has intervention and regime change worked out in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya?
I have a few questions whenever I hear about these “humanitarian interventions”: How are these leaders concerned for their own citizens? What are the social conditions for the working class? Does the “humanitarian intervention” provide cover for corporate or geopolitical interests?
Do we need to comment on how well the bottom 50% of Americans are doing? How about the EU’s concern for its southern members like Greece? How about Israel’s humanitarian concern of the previous dominant inhabitants of Palestine?
We are dealing with proven liars in Trump, May, Macron and Johnson. Believe them at you own peril. It is your fault for accepting their continued deceits.
Here is a further motive: Under the pretense of an “independent” investigation into chemical weapons, intelligence workers pick military sites of interests for “close examination”. Russia has been a victim of this ploy once before. You also have to ask which countries have the expertise to lead this panel of “independent” investigators? Are these not the same countries accusing Syria?
Please dear reader, identify a single country with a proven track record of independence from western ideological supremacy? I cannot name one, so to my mind what is the basis of the “independent” investigation?
Let us state the “international community” is simply a euphemism for coerced western consensus. This blogger asserts that the UN, WHO, World Bank, NATO, BIS are mechanisms of western mind control* and exploitation.
* Yes! Mind control.They have created a fake reality that these bodies are fair, neutral, independent but actually hide very partisan/corporate interests. Let us elaborate on these mind control institutions:
UN – Deceit of international political/diplomatic governance
WHO – Western hegemony on what constitutes accepted medical practices
NATO -Public face of US lead global military dominance.
BIS/World Bank/IMF – Mechanism global financial control and authority
“WE’RE THEIR REAL ENEMY”
24 years ago one independent journalist predicted EXACTLY where we’d be today.
Note: The pirates and their political/military dogs in the US/Europe keep pushing the turds of Islamist terrorists , Russia, North Korea and Iran. One bull excrement after another. Let us contrast the hard influence of the US (military bases) in foreign lands with claims of soft Russian influence in elections. Military force (violence) vs lobbying/advertising? Coercion vs persuasion!
I thought it useful to have the mugshots of these colluders and order followers. We can then play the game “identify the bilderberger” when watching online videos of their “no comment” performances. This exercise also shows that some attendees are providing reports/updates on their chosen specialty, eg Johanna Rosén, Professor in Materials Physics, Linköping University (SWE). Rosen is a specialist in nanolaminates? What is a potential use of nanolaminates? Improved magnetic materials for say electric motors for use in electric vehicles. You could also take the view as an amoral investor, what better way to profit, than to hear what these guys and girls are talking about?
Castries, Henri de (FRA), President of Institut Montaigne; Former Chairman and CEO, AXA
(CHAIRMAN STEERING COMMITTEE)
Achleitner, Paul M. (DEU), Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG; Treasurer, Bilderberg Meeting
Adonis, Andrew (GBR), Chair, National Infrastructure Commission
Agius, Marcus (GBR), Chairman, PA Consulting Group
Akyol, Mustafa (TUR), Senior Visiting Fellow, Freedom Project at Wellesley College
Alstadheim, Kjetil B. (NOR), Political Editor, Dagens Næringsliv
Altman, Roger C. (USA), Founder and Senior Chairman, Evercore
Arnaut, José Luis (PRT), Managing Partner, CMS Rui Pena & Arnaut
Barroso, José M. Durão (PRT), Chairman, Goldman Sachs International
Bäte, Oliver (DEU), CEO, Allianz SE
Baumann, Werner (DEU), Chairman, Bayer AG
Baverez, Nicolas (FRA), Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
Benko, René (AUT), Founder and Chairman of the Advisory Board, SIGNA Holding GmbH
Berner, Anne-Catherine (FIN), Minister of Transport and Communications
Botín, Ana P. (ESP), Executive Chairman, Banco Santander
Brandtzæg, Svein Richard (NOR), President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA
Brennan, John O. (USA), Senior Advisor, Kissinger Associates Inc.
Bsirske, Frank (DEU), Chairman, United Services Union
Buberl, Thomas (FRA), CEO, AXA
Bunn, M. Elaine (USA), Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense
Burns, William J. (USA), President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Çakiroglu, Levent (TUR), CEO, Koç Holding A.S.
Çamlibel, Cansu (TUR), Washington DC Bureau Chief, Hürriyet Newspaper
Cebrián, Juan Luis (ESP), Executive Chairman, PRISA and El País
Clemet, Kristin (NOR), CEO, Civita
Cohen, David S. (USA), Former Deputy Director, CIA
Collison, Patrick (USA), CEO, Stripe
Cotton, Tom (USA), Senator
Cui, Tiankai (CHN), Ambassador to the United States
Döpfner, Mathias (DEU), CEO, Axel Springer SE
Elkann, John (ITA), Chairman, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
Enders, Thomas (DEU), CEO, Airbus SE
Federspiel, Ulrik (DNK), Group Executive, Haldor Topsøe Holding A/S
Ferguson, Jr., Roger W. (USA), President and CEO, TIAA
Ferguson, Niall (USA), Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University
Gianotti, Fabiola (ITA), Director General, CERN
Gozi, Sandro (ITA), State Secretary for European Affairs
Graham, Lindsey (USA), Senator
Greenberg, Evan G. (USA), Chairman and CEO, Chubb Group
Griffin, Kenneth (USA), Founder and CEO, Citadel Investment Group, LLC
Gruber, Lilli (ITA), Editor-in-Chief and Anchor “Otto e mezzo”, La7 TV
Guindos, Luis de (ESP), Minister of Economy, Industry and Competiveness
Haines, Avril D. (USA), Former Deputy National Security Advisor
Halberstadt, Victor (NLD), Professor of Economics, Leiden University;
Hamers, Ralph (NLD), Chairman, ING Group
Hedegaard, Connie (DNK), Chair, KR Foundation
Hennis-Plasschaert, Jeanine (NLD), Minister of Defence, The Netherlands
Here is another manipulated image. Take careful note of the shadows under the faces. Only Salman Abedi has his shadow on his right shoulder. All the others in the image have their shadows on their left shoulders. A huge anomaly? Why?
Why are the lights TOTALLY unaffected by the blast. A clear solid line of flourescent lights in the foyer after the bomb blast. Is this not strange? Furthermore with 22 reported deaths and 59 injured, should we NOT see more people being attended to in this picture? Is this really a picture of the bomb scene? The more you think about this image, the stranger it becomes. Why don’t we have more images from the scene? Where is the picture of the damaged floor under the “bomber”? It was “strong” enough to decapitate the “bomber”. In this age of mobile phones, the paucity of images of the immediate scene is strange?