Tag Archives: Trump

The Joker (Trump) will reform or eliminate corrupt US Institutions?

We have Trump as the winner of the “Consenting to the lesser evil” election.

Will the drug dealing, regime changing CIA be abolished?
How about the NSA, who or what does it serve, certainly not the US people?
Will Trump audit the Federal Reserve or even abolish it?
Will Trump prosecute all executives and traders that were involved in fraud – simple financial deceits?
The joker will still rely on the inherently deceitful BAR members of the legal profession. Oh, have I gone to far? Then reader why does this profession obfuscate its assumptions, procedures, principles and maxims?
Why do BAR members continue the deceit that law can and only be practised by their licensed members?

How about Trump prosecutes fraud or collusion in the following bodies:
CDC – deceiving public about vaccine safety
FCC – hiding wireless risks to health
FDA – collusion with GMO producers

Why do we still need the TSA or Homeland security? Will the “lesser evil” Trump repeal the Patriot Act.
How about a public inquiry into the IRS and whether its can lawfully collect taxes.
Democrats, Republicans, Senate, Congress, you wish to drain the swamp? Start there!

I had a simple test for that other “lesser evil”, Nobel peace prize winner, Obama: Close down Guantanamo bay. He failed and proved to be a lackey of the globalists lunatics.

Will Trump initiate a national debate about electoral reform and direct democracy? Jon Rappoport mentioned Trump “livestreaming” straight to the public, asking their opinions.

The entertainment and news media are corrupt corporatists – 3 brass monkeys – see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil

Is Donald aware of the cultural shift required in the aggregate of Americans for a change? Infantilism in Hollywood films is profitable. Trump will not change that.

Trade agreements? You did not like NAFTA? Well Trump, here is my test for you: Reject TPP/TTIP/CETA/TISA.

Initiate an international, open and recorded discussion on real Trade not pretentions “free trade” zones.

How about a discussion on land and property rights? Are we, “transient beings” on this planet, custodians or owners of the earth resources? How does a group of people calling themselves government (statists) appropriate the right to use violence to acquire land? Is there a time limit to void “ownership” acquired by violence or fraud?

How about an open, livestreamed debate on banking, monetary, debt reform?

Consenting to Evil: The American 2016 herding

The binary choice between lesser evils is still evil. We look back at the Hitler era and wonder how the educated and cultured germans fell for the ploys of hitler and co. We watch in real-time the corrupt media in lock step sell the turd of Hillary’s presidency. Trump is labeled anti-establishment whilst he has historical links to zionists, jesuits and even the clintons.

The murderous, psycopathic interests that gave us the false flag of 911 would not be threatented by a Trump presidency. Will the CIA, FBI, TSA, CDC, FCC, Federel reserve, BAR members, Papal knights be investigated or removed? Of course not!

The deceits and criminality are etched into many aspects of American life. Twice now the Federal Bereau of Incompetents has given Hillary the all clear. Banana republics and despots will be looking forward with gleefully cynicism to the utterances of the next US president.

Does your vote not give consent to an evil? Hillary’s continuation of Bush and Obama’s global thuggery and theft. Are Trump supporters aware his property empire is predicated on bankster loan frauds (money out of thin air). Will Trump reject the neocons and corporatists advisors?

Neither side cares for truth, as long as their “lesser evil” candidate wins.

African American have been slavish devotion to the Democratic gang and hence Hillary. Will Trump with his autocratic and corporatists tendencies benefit them? Where is the evidence of this in his coporate hiring and tenancy policies?
Is the binary choice an ethical choice? If the large undecided swung to a third party what would that mean? Does that give the reduced winner of the expected binary choice a mandate? No but it sends a clear signal that enough people have NOT been coralled like texas cattle into the Hillary or Trump camps. After that, they set a blaze of local, state activists fires.

Based on turnout at rallies, Trump has beaten Hillary. Will this popular landslide be enough? It is obvious that a computer voting system is open to fraud even with a paper audit trail. Yet this is deemed acceptable by the statists officials. Imagine a swing to a third party, how will that be massaged? What will the polls say?

Whilst we have been distracted by this farce , Obama allows Dakato land grabs, Isreal continues to blockade Gaza, Ethiopia continues killing Oromo people for their land, Syria’s dismemberment continues, Europe’s self inflicted migrant crisis continues, China and Russian continue to be provoked into another nonsensical war caused by lunatics at the helm of power.

Cowboys and cowgirls, herding the cattle! Obama’s “change” rhetoric is all the evidence you need to see the farce!  2008 was the first black president pasture/gambit/scam/con. Now we have the first woman and an ‘anti-establishment’ pastures.

Trump and AIPAC – the litmus test

The warmongering record of Republican and Democratic parties from Bush I to Obama is repugnant. The pretender Obama promised a rollback from war, detentions without trial. The Nobel peace prize winner was actually a wolf in black sheep clothing.

In that light, establishment candidates Hilary and Jeb can be written off as more of the same global disaster – war, bankster fraud, global corporatism, food and medical monopolies, surveillance, migrations, in short oligarchal control of the world.

It was no surprise that Hilary Clinton attended and presented herself as the expected friend of this lobby.

Bernie Sanders had “other engagements” that prevented his attendance at AIPAC, bearing in mind his jewish faith, you could take the view that his attendance would work against him.

A few commentators have noted Trump’s usefullness in exposing some issues like immigration and trade agreements but have been wary of endorsing him. Others have gone all in, stating Trump is the real deal.

Take Trump and his AIPAC teleprompter speech, it cannot be intended to reconcile or resolve the conflict in the middle east. It paints a big target on Iran for the benefit of Israel.

If Trump is “only saying that to get support”, why will that not apply to your vote, your support? What makes your vote or support immune from betrayal?

As much as I value the diversity of opinions, Trump’s prostration before the jewish lobby is a litmus test of integrity. He failed!

Why? The pro-Israel narrative is the dominant narrative in western media (US, UK, EU). Trump has made a show of railing against MSM. It was marketing gold. The media matrix increased their ratings on attacking him and hosting Trump debates.

The straight talking swagering cowboy was tamed. He had to use a teleprompter to stay on point and not shoot from the hip! That is a clear indication of the high stakes. His kneeling before this lobby exposes the fragmented nature of the voting public which causes politicians old and new to essentially lie to get votes.
Are the desires of AIPAC in alignment with the anti-immigration, anti-too-big-to-fail Trump supporters?

The credibility of bloggers, talking heads, alternative media will be enhanced or destroyed by their position on Trump. Trump’s visit and speech will serve as the litmus test.

For the record, on Tuesday 22nd March 2016, I am stating that he (Trump/Drumpf) is not the real deal!