UK Withdrawal from the European Union — Delay Withdrawal if MPs Agree Withdrawal Agreement — 14 Mar 2019 at 17:00
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
||111 (+2 tell)
||187 (+2 tell)
The majority of Labour, Independents, Liberal Democrats and Scottish Nationalist Party voted for a delay. So we have 412 “honourable” and informed members of Parliament voting for a delay versus 201 voting against.
Based on these numbers, the Europhilic MPs have enough numbers to push through the votes to change the law concerning the default exit day of 29th march 2019.
Treacherous europhiles! Labour…protecting
the working class corporations and the EU superstate?
Published 14 March 2019
The UK will boost its defensive capabilities by hosting a major international military exercise for two weeks from 30 March 2019.
More than 10,000 military personnel, 35 warships, 5 submarines and 59 aircraft and helicopters from 13 countries will take part in Exercise Joint Warrior until 11 April.
The aim of Joint Warrior is to allow the UK’s Royal Navy, Army, Royal Air Force and their allies to conduct joint operations involving different forces and units and against a range of current and future threats
There following nations are taking part in Exercise Joint Warrior: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, the UK and the US.
“On operation yellowhammer, which is the emergency planning for a no-deal Brexit, it is beyond comprehension that any Prime Minister could knowingly allow the country to be eight days—about 200 hours—away from the possibility of crashing out of the European Union without a deal and to require that emergency planning work to be done”
– The First Minister (Nicola Sturgeon) on Yellowhammer
The question I have is: Why commit 10,000 troops during a key period of political change?
We should be leaving the EU at 11pm on Friday 29th and yet we have 10,000 troops in an exercise (cover) from 30th March to 11th April (two weeks)! As UK column pointed out, best to have foreign troops if you need to forcefully crack down on UK populace.
Would you want foreign troops diverting military resources during your contingency planning? Incompetence, over-confidence or worst case planning for unrest?
“If the deal goes through, the next day we will not have left the EU in anything but name. For at least 21 months of “transition” – extendable up to four years – we will have to obey the EU’s laws and rules, and be subject to the Commission and the ECJ as now. The big difference is that we will no longer have a vote or voice in the EU institutions. So no vote or veto against EU law changes which damage the City, or against the Commission’s use of State Aid controls to suppress our competitiveness.
The Brexit process will not be “over”, or “done and dusted” by signing the deal. Those 21 months – or longer – will be filled with the turmoil of ongoing negotiations about our future relationship. We will be negotiating against a real “cliff edge” at the end of the transition – unlike the largely mythical and Project Fear 3.0 “cliff edge” we face now. If we do not submit to the detailed terms offered by the EU for our long-term relationship, we will automatically fall over the cliff edge into the backstop Protocol.”
“The deal does not deliver Brexit except in name. Not only does in not deliver Brexit, it also makes it impossible for a future Prime Minister to deliver a real Brexit as well, for many years to come or indefinitely. The momentary relief from some Leave supporters at nominally leaving the EU is sure to turn to anger, disillusionment and blame when it becomes clearer and clearer that Brexit has not been delivered, and that the Conservative Party in particular – including the Brexiteers – has failed to deliver real Brexit and has delivered a locked-in fake Brexit instead.”
See also: Where in the deal are the big problems?
The reader will note the clarity within these articles and previous posts is absent from BBC/Sky reporting in the UK. Confusion, obfuscation and anti-brexit sentiment abound.
BBC: Brexit: How can Article 50 be extended?
BRINO: Brexit In Name Only.
Note: As the previous posts points out, time is against them to either delay or cancel Brexit
Update @19:43: BBC: MPs have voted by 312 to 308 to reject leaving the EU without a withdrawal agreement
This means Theresa May must get 27 EU countries to agree an extension and then pass legislation in both houses (Commons & Lords) to change the 29th March 2019 date.
Disclosure: The image obtained from the BBC site has been edited to add the green ticks for my preferred outcome and the BRINO tag.
An excellent article on the options before our pretentious political puppets concerning Brexit.
The red boxes in the image above show the path to the default/pending outcome: No Deal. They have already rejected WA&PD!
…if the UK is still in the EU (or has BRINO) after 29th March. In that circumstance, the DUP might depart, if they had not already and the Government would either fall or require a new Prime Minister who had not supported the WA
…If the Government brings back the same deal without an exit to the backstop, it will be defeated. If it is defeated, there will be no second referendum or prolonged stay in the EU. The UK will leave. In short, don’t panic: if MPs hold their nerve, we are leaving the EU on 29th March without a permanent backstop.
Note: The ongoing military unification is not addressed by this article or MSM. You could argue that there was a certain expectation that the political class would deliver REMAIN or BRINO (Brexit In Name Only)!
What are we to make of these Rt Honourable Oxbridge graduates, Tony Blair, David Cameron and Theresa May?
“May later attended the University of Oxford”
“he (Blair) enrolled for university at St John’s College, Oxford, reading Jurisprudence for three years”
“Cameron began his Bachelor of Arts course in Philosophy, Politics and Economics (PPE) at Brasenose College, Oxford”
They are not stupid people, so this mess is intentional. I agree with David Icke totally on this. To engineer a Brexit deal worse that remaining in the EU takes some collusion by both parties – May and the EU.
Based on their compulsive lying in support of the EU we can be sure they serve their “hidden hand” masters, They are willing treacherous accomplices.
We can now add another lying treacherous scumbag to this group, privy council oath taker Jeremy Corbyn.
We can take note in December 2018 that 3 recent Prime Ministers being the recipients of the best (once free) University education Britain has to offer are compliant before the TTIP/TPP corporatist pile of excrement called the European Union.
Note: Are we surprised that this order follower would repeat the lies of his supposed political master “Right Honorable” liar Theresa May. As Director of MI5, can we assume he is aligned with the pretensions of the UK, US, EU, Israel project in the south central Eurasia (Middle East)? Of course!
It becomes very amusing to hear Parker and May accuse Russia of political interference via social media or cyber propaganda. Is that not benign compared to the wanton violence and poisoning inflicted on Iraq, Syria, Libya and Afghanistan?
The pretentious western leadership class have no problems interfering in African, Asian or Latin American national interests, actions they accuse Russia of doing.
Hey Andrew Parker, you want to do humanity a favour? Focus your department on rooting out the pedophilic control structure within the UK alongside, exposing the individuals (not corporate names) benefiting from the ownership of the Bank of England and the Bank of International Settlements.
We can conclude with considerable certainty, that the western leadership class as order followers of capital’s priests and oligarchs are compelled to bare-face lies to further their collective criminal “rule of law” pretentions.