Tag Archives: Theresa May

10,000 troops from 13 countries arrive in the UK for major exercise

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/10000-troops-from-13-countries-arrive-in-the-uk-for-major-exercise
Published 14 March 2019

The UK will boost its defensive capabilities by hosting a major international military exercise for two weeks from 30 March 2019.
More than 10,000 military personnel, 35 warships, 5 submarines and 59 aircraft and helicopters from 13 countries will take part in Exercise Joint Warrior until 11 April.

The aim of Joint Warrior is to allow the UK’s Royal Navy, Army, Royal Air Force and their allies to conduct joint operations involving different forces and units and against a range of current and future threats

There following nations are taking part in Exercise Joint Warrior: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, the UK and the US.

Operation Yellowhammer
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47658403

“On operation yellowhammer, which is the emergency planning for a no-deal Brexit, it is beyond comprehension that any Prime Minister could knowingly allow the country to be eight days—about 200 hours—away from the possibility of crashing out of the European Union without a deal and to require that emergency planning work to be done”

The First Minister (Nicola Sturgeon) on Yellowhammer

The question I have is: Why commit 10,000 troops during a key period of political change?

We should be leaving the EU at 11pm on Friday 29th and yet we have 10,000 troops in an exercise (cover) from 30th March to 11th April (two weeks)! As UK column pointed out, best to have foreign troops if you need to forcefully crack down on UK populace.

Would you want foreign troops diverting military resources during your contingency planning? Incompetence, over-confidence or worst case planning for unrest?

Advertisements

Theresa May’s “fake Brexit” – the alternatives are far less damaging

https://brexitcentral.com/theresa-mays-deal-remains-fake-brexit-alternatives-far-less-damaging/

“If the deal goes through, the next day we will not have left the EU in anything but name. For at least 21 months of “transition” – extendable up to four years – we will have to obey the EU’s laws and rules, and be subject to the Commission and the ECJ as now. The big difference is that we will no longer have a vote or voice in the EU institutions. So no vote or veto against EU law changes which damage the City, or against the Commission’s use of State Aid controls to suppress our competitiveness.

The Brexit process will not be “over”, or “done and dusted” by signing the deal. Those 21 months – or longer – will be filled with the turmoil of ongoing negotiations about our future relationship. We will be negotiating against a real “cliff edge” at the end of the transition – unlike the largely mythical and Project Fear 3.0 “cliff edge” we face now. If we do not submit to the detailed terms offered by the EU for our long-term relationship, we will automatically fall over the cliff edge into the backstop Protocol.”

The deal does not deliver Brexit except in name. Not only does in not deliver Brexit, it also makes it impossible for a future Prime Minister to deliver a real Brexit as well, for many years to come or indefinitely. The momentary relief from some Leave supporters at nominally leaving the EU is sure to turn to anger, disillusionment and blame when it becomes clearer and clearer that Brexit has not been delivered, and that the Conservative Party in particular – including the Brexiteers – has failed to deliver real Brexit and has delivered a locked-in fake Brexit instead.”

See also: Where in the deal are the big problems?

The reader will note the clarity within these articles and previous posts is absent from BBC/Sky reporting in the UK. Confusion, obfuscation and anti-brexit sentiment abound.

Brexit: How the Pretentious Political Puppets could delay Brexit

BBC: Brexit: How can Article 50 be extended?

brexit_flowchart_extending_article50_640-nc
BRINO: Brexit In Name Only.
Note: As the previous posts points out, time is against them to either delay or cancel Brexit
Update @19:43: BBC: MPs have voted by 312 to 308 to reject leaving the EU without a withdrawal agreement
This means Theresa May must get 27 EU countries to agree an extension and then pass legislation in both houses (Commons & Lords) to change the 29th March 2019 date.

Disclosure: The image obtained from the BBC site has been edited to add the green ticks for my preferred outcome and the BRINO tag.

Brexit: Deal or no deal, here’s why Brexit cannot be stopped

An excellent article on the options before our pretentious political puppets concerning Brexit.
https://brexitcentral.com/deal-no-deal-heres-brexit-cannot-stopped/
Brexit Decision flow
The red boxes in the image above show the path to the default/pending outcome: No Deal. They have already rejected WA&PD!

…if the UK is still in the EU (or has BRINO) after 29th March. In that circumstance, the DUP might depart, if they had not already and the Government would either fall or require a new Prime Minister who had not supported the WA
…If the Government brings back the same deal without an exit to the backstop, it will be defeated. If it is defeated, there will be no second referendum or prolonged stay in the EU. The UK will leave. In short, don’t panic: if MPs hold their nerve, we are leaving the EU on 29th March without a permanent backstop.

Note: The ongoing military unification is not addressed by this article or MSM. You could argue that there was a certain expectation that the political class would deliver REMAIN or BRINO (Brexit In Name Only)!

The Brexit Mess Planned All Along To Thwart The Will Of The People – David Icke

What are we to make of these Rt Honourable Oxbridge graduates, Tony Blair, David Cameron and Theresa May?

“May later attended the University of Oxford”

“he (Blair) enrolled for university at St John’s College, Oxford, reading Jurisprudence for three years”

“Cameron began his Bachelor of Arts course in Philosophy, Politics and Economics (PPE) at Brasenose College, Oxford”

They are  not stupid people, so this mess is intentional. I agree with David Icke totally on this. To engineer a Brexit deal worse that remaining in the EU takes some collusion by both parties – May and the EU.

Based on their compulsive lying in support of the EU we can be sure they serve their “hidden hand” masters, They are willing treacherous accomplices.

We can now add another lying treacherous scumbag to this group, privy council oath taker Jeremy Corbyn.

We can take note in December 2018 that 3 recent Prime Ministers being the recipients  of the best (once free) University education Britain has to offer are compliant before the TTIP/TPP corporatist pile of excrement called the European Union.

Andrew Parker, MI5 Director a Barefaced Liar

Note: Are we surprised that this order follower would repeat the lies of his supposed political master “Right Honorable” liar Theresa May. As Director of MI5, can we assume he is aligned with the pretensions of the UK, US, EU, Israel project in the south central Eurasia (Middle East)? Of course!

It becomes very amusing to hear Parker and May accuse Russia of political interference via social media or cyber propaganda. Is that not benign compared to the wanton violence and poisoning inflicted on Iraq, Syria, Libya and Afghanistan?

The pretentious western leadership class have no problems interfering in African, Asian or Latin American national interests, actions they accuse Russia of doing.

Hey Andrew Parker, you want to do humanity a favour? Focus your department on rooting out the pedophilic control structure within the UK alongside, exposing the individuals (not corporate names) benefiting from the ownership of the Bank of England and the Bank of International Settlements.

We can conclude with considerable certainty, that the western leadership class as order followers of capital’s priests and oligarchs are compelled to bare-face lies to further their collective criminal “rule of law” pretentions.

Western Liars and their “Chemical Weapons” deceit

The Right Honorable Theresa May and Boris Johnson did not provide their evidence for the nerve agent debacle in Salisbury, near Porto Down. It was in line with previous lies about Russian interference in elections.  The new lie, is that Bashar al-Assad’s government used chemical weapons.

Does Assad benefit from using chemical weapons knowing the West will use it as justification for further intervention?  No!

Will the US/UK/Israel/NATO stage “violent acts” to further an agenda? Yes is the answer! The most brazen being 911. We have seen multiple staged events in the UK  and European mainland since then.

Lies and deceit amongst the corporate, political and military leadership in the West can be taken as axiomatic. To profess a value whilst doing the exact opposite. What did we see in the movie Black Panther? An advanced nation sharing its technology and seeking to correct historical mistakes. A direct inversion of the reality of the US, UK, Australia and NATO members.

We can take the West’s humanitarian concern for chemical weapons use, as purely a ploy, a deceit to further their and Israel’s agenda. It is a transparent deceit once you know the “western leadership” cadre are pretentious concerning the “rule of law”.

We know the West (including Israel)  has the inclination, history and motive to stage “terrorists acts” that further their supremacy, so claiming a chemical attack happened is a convenient excuse to coerce public support and project a false moral concern for Syrian citizens.

Reader you will recall the US used Depleted Uranium armaments in Iraq. A hazard to both its own troops and the local population. Does the long term “chemical poisoning” of the land and air by DU weapons concern these Western hypocrites? How about Israel’s continued brutish and genocidal behavior in Gaza? How has intervention and regime change worked out in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya?

I have a few questions whenever I hear about these “humanitarian interventions”: How are these leaders concerned for their own citizens? What are the social conditions for the working class? Does the “humanitarian intervention” provide cover for corporate or geopolitical interests?

The Rt Hon. Theresa May and Boris Johnson fail miserably concerning the well being of the working class and poor in the UK. A festering example?  Nine months after the fire, only 70 of 211 Grenfell families have moved into permanent housing, prompting complaints of apathy and incompetence by the local council

Ministers will face a backlash against reform to the benefits system when millions of claimants moving on to universal credit realise their income will be cut, the government’s most senior welfare adviser has warned

Do we need to comment on how well the bottom 50% of Americans are doing? How about the EU’s concern for its southern members like Greece? How about Israel’s humanitarian concern of the previous dominant inhabitants of Palestine?

We are dealing with proven liars in Trump, May, Macron and Johnson. Believe them at you own peril. It is your fault for accepting their continued deceits.

Here is a further motive: Under the pretense of an “independent” investigation into chemical weapons, intelligence workers pick military sites of interests for “close examination”. Russia has been a victim of this ploy once before. You also have to ask which countries have the expertise to lead this panel of “independent” investigators? Are these not the same countries accusing Syria?

Please dear reader, identify a single country with a proven track record of independence from western ideological supremacy? I cannot name one, so to my mind what is the basis of the “independent” investigation?

Let us state the “international community” is simply a euphemism for coerced western consensus. This blogger asserts that the UN, WHO, World Bank, NATO, BIS are mechanisms of western mind control* and exploitation.

* Yes! Mind control.They have created a fake reality that these bodies are fair, neutral, independent but actually hide very partisan/corporate interests. Let us elaborate on these mind control institutions:
UN – Deceit of international political/diplomatic governance
WHO  – Western hegemony on what constitutes accepted medical practices
NATO -Public face of US lead global military dominance.
BIS/World Bank/IMF – Mechanism global financial control and authority