Tag Archives: SARS-CoV-2

The Infectious Myth – Stephen Bustin on Challenges with RT-PCR

https://infectiousmyth.podbean.com/e/the-infectious-myth-stephen-bustin-on-challenges-with-rt-pcr/

RT-PCR is the main method for declaring that someone is COVID-19 infected or not, as well as having numerous other uses in molecular biology research and biological testing. Professor Stephen Bustin is a world expert on the technology, and the potential problems with using it to produce accurate and repeatable results. Although the coronavirus test is presented as a binary test, it is actually based on whether the production of DNA is detectable prior to an arbitrary number of PCR cycles. If there is variability in the quantification, then samples will be above or below the limit, when they should not be, resulting in false positives and negatives. David and Stephen walk through the steps, from the extraction of RNA from the original sample, the conversion of the RNA to complementary DNA, and duplication of DNA using PCR, and the optional step of sequencing. While this is dense technical information at times, it is presented logically, and the limitations of this method cannot be understood without taking the cover off the black box. We suggest not listening to this episode when you are trying to do anything else, but sit down in a quiet place so that you can concentrate fully.

The Infectious Myth: A Book Project by David Crowe

https://theinfectiousmyth.com/

Most people believe that every disease on the following list has an infectious cause:

There is considerable scientific evidence that these diseases do not just have non-infectious co-factors, but that they are environmental in nature, not infectious.

https://theinfectiousmyth.com/

A Vital Paper: David Crowe challenges the discovery of the COVID-19 virus

by Jon Rappoport

April 24, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

Canadian author and independent researcher, David Crowe, has spent several decades analyzing and torpedoing SPECIFICS of conventional medical research. At the deepest level.

I’m talking about, for example, the mainstream claims of discovering new viruses.

Crowe doesn’t lay on vague brushstrokes. He goes to the core of fabrications and exposes them, chapter and verse.

His new paper, which he continues to update and expand, is: “Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory”.

Here I quote from the section of his paper where he takes up the question of discovery—have researchers actually found a new virus which they assert is the cause of a new pandemic, COVID-19?

At the end of this article, I list the published papers Crowe refers to by number, as he takes apart the very basis of the COVID illusion.

David Crowe: “Scientists are detecting novel RNA in multiple patients with pneumonia-like conditions, and are assuming that the detection of RNA (which is believed to be wrapped in proteins to form an RNA virus, as coronaviruses are believed to be) is equivalent to isolation of the virus. It is not, and one of the groups of scientists was honest enough to admit this”:

“’we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood’” [2]

“But, despite this admission, earlier in the paper they repeatedly referred to the 41 cases (out of 59 similar cases) that tested positive for this RNA as, ‘41 patients…confirmed to be infected with 2019-nCoV’.”

“Another paper quietly admitted that”:

“’our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates’” [1]

A Vital Paper: David Crowe challenges the discovery of the COVID-19 virus

 

 

UK: 007 License to Kill our Seniors

A son telling the story of how his dad was euthanized in the hospital whilst in good health #covid19 #corona #pandemic #alllivesmatter #morphine

 

Note: The so called NHS Heroes are COMPLICIT in the CONVID-19 deceit. They help fabricate the COVID-19 deaths and use their professional “OPINION” to mindfully commit murder to aid the vaccine and medical tyranny agenda
Every NHS Hero has a choice. Assist in LYING about the cause of deaths or even worse apply a terminal protocol to COVID-19 labelled patients. They are now “Medical Order Followers”.  Simply following orders!

Dr David Sinclair – Harvard Prof & Researcher telling LIES about COVID-19

“…only two outcomes in this world scenario either we all get or enough of us get it so it’s roughly 50% of us have gotten it and that’s gonna be terrible

or the vaccine arrives in time to prevent all of that…”

Note: To accuse someone of Lying, I must have evidence. There are multiple fallacies in his interview such as appeals to authority and vague generalisations.
At around 12mins in Dr Sinclair asserts that there are only two solutions: 50% of the world get SARS-nCoV2 or a vaccine.
How do I know he is a LIAR? This CORONAVIRUS can be treated with Vitamin C. If Intravenous Vitamin C can deal with SEPSIS and Pneumonia, then as they say SARS-nCoV2 induces pneumonia, then we have our SAFE, CHEAP solution.
No vaccines required! Millions saved in research grants.
Furthermore he avoids mentioning the impact of nutrition, supplementation and lifestyle in maintaning a strong immune system. He might as well wear a big Pharma tee-shirt.

COVID: two vital experiments that have never been done

Why not? Because they would expose this vicious farce, the criminals perpetuating it, and end the lockdowns.

by Jon Rappoport

April 10, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

The first experiment would confirm or deny the accuracy of the PCR diagnostic test. The experiment would reveal whether this widespread test for COVID-19 can actually predict illness in the real world, in humans, not in the lab.

This experiment has never been done. It should have been done before the PCR was ever permitted to make claims about THE QUANTIY OF VIRUS that is replicating in a patient’s body.

Quantity is vital, because, in order to even begin talking about whether a virus can cause disease, millions and millions of virus must be actively replicating in a patient’s body.

Here is the experiment. Assemble a group of 500 volunteers, some sick, some healthy. Take tissue samples from them, and give the samples to PCR technicians. The technicians will never see or know who the 500 volunteers are.

The techs run these samples through the PCR. For each sample, they report which virus they found, and how much of it they found.

“In patients 34, 57, 83, 165, and 433, we found a great deal of the following disease-causing viruses.”

Now we un-blind those specific patients. By the test results, they should all be sick. Are they? Aren’t they? Then we would know. We would know how accurate and relevant the test is in the real world.

Of course, this is not the end of the experiment. The same samples should have been given to a whole other set of PCR techs to run. Did they come up with the same results the first set of PR techs did?

Several new groups of 500 patients each should be enlisted, and still more sets of lab techs should repeat the experiment, ending up with confirmation or rejection of the initial findings. This is the way the scientific method is supposed to work.

In the absence of this experiment, the quantitative PCR must be looked at as a rogue hypothesis that should never have been foisted on the public. It should never be used as the basis for determining case numbers of any disease.

In the “COVID-19 crisis,” all case numbers derived from the PCR should be thrown out…

COVID: two vital experiments that have never been done