You can understand the UK Daily Mirror taking it’s stance from the Rt. Hon. Theresa May. She is an unabashed agent of two pillars of Western deceit: Debt addict Bankers and legalese fraudster BAR Members. You will note that her speech was at Mansion House located in their corrupt “City of London” loot-cave.
Hey, Putin here are my Bank details: HSBC Bank Plc Sort code: 00-06-66 Account number 911-77-223.
Note: Regarding Grenfell, we have identified the cover-up. Do we expect this criminal paedophilic establishment to incriminate themselves? Do we expect the current inherently duplicitous judiciary, the police as their order followers or the subservient firemen or ambulance personnel to break rank? Systemic policies leading to the Grenfell deaths are cross party – Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrats.
Indeed, it is very easy to forget that these dysfunctional paedophilic psychopaths must NOT be relied on to expose, solve and punish their crimes.
For further insights into the deceitful tricks played by global BAR members look up Frank O’Collins and sovereignliving.
Note: We now see collusion between the police, fire-fighters, council and the media. Why attempt to hide the true number of fatalities?
This is UK in 2017! Cover-up, corruption and collusion as default mode of behaviour! How can we trust the police with this level of obfuscation?
Is this the tipping point? Sorrow turning into raging anger towards establishment figures and individuals involved?
Asking another question, what would a survivor or relation of a victim want? That question exposed the empty platitudes and PR stunts of the Queen and her priviy council puppets – Rt Hon May and Rt Hon Corbyn.
A simple task of having an aide document the needs of the survivors, as well as maintain a daily status as to their well-being. Did Queen Lizzy do this? Did Prince William do this? Did any of Queen Lizzies privy council oath-takers do this?
No! A simple, sincere act to help the affected NOT a PR presence out of some hypocritical sense of obligation or duty!
Queen Lizzy II, if your sense of duty to visit the affected is that strong, why does it NOT apply 24/7, 365 days of the year? Grenfell Tower is deadly symptom of social policy under your long-reign. Under your watch!
This again underlines why we must REJECT the domininance of humanity by a small group of self-serving sociopaths.
Note: Theresa May as a puppet of deep-state (hidden) interests has colluded in the criminal acts she now uses to justify internet censorship and the brutalization of society by a militarized and thuggish police.
This condemns HRH Elizabeth II. As all MPs bearing the title “Right Honourable” have sworn an allegiance to her, she must know what her public political puppets are up to. Privy council members swore to inform Lizzy II of any dangers to her welbeing.
So what does Queen Liz know about:
- MI5/MI6 and IS collusion in Libya and Syria?
- What does the Elizabeth II know about HSBC’s criminal drug money laundering?
- What does her highness know about the creeping privatisation of the NHS?
- What does the monarch know about the increasing disparity between the financial “city” and the rest of the country?
- Does the Queen approve of the murderous UK interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria?
- Is the Queen aware Manchester and London were false-flags attacks?
- Does she believe her grand-son fighting in Afghanistan, was fighting a noble cause and not a faux enemy?
If the Queen of England, Elizabeth II of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha is ignorant of the bloody acts of her government, what are we to make of the Privy council oath? Why bring this up? If I, a blogger, a lay person can gather, process and determine unlawful, criminal acts by the state, what excuse does she have? Why does she collude with the false flags by trotting out to visit the injured in hospital?
What excuse does the monarch have to keep silent about the path her government – privy council members – have taken?
The multi billion pound funded GCHQ, MI5 and MI6 of Her Majesty’s Secret Service was cinematic mythology? Are we to conclude then they serve no use to her majesty, as she is supremely ignorant of the deceits and fantastic corruption of her political peons?
So which is it HRH Queen Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor? You are ignorant of the crimes of your oath takers or you have been informed and consent?
IMAGE from Youtube:IHS – Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM) – NWO
Note: Crown corporation is NOT the Crown of Queen Lizzy II. Queen Lizzy II heads the “Order of the Garter” linked to the Knights of Malta. Tony Blair, George Bush Snr, Nelson Mandela are Knights Malta.
We can use the graphic as a framework to understand and place the treasonous players and psycopaths regarding events.
In this light, we can make an assumption that leaders in any field will be appropriated as per JFK’s secrecy speech. The most obvious match to JFk’s reference are the freemasons and Vatican knights. The BAR guild of private legalese practioners are involved in global deceits. Their deceits bring into question all legal systems based on their franchise: US, Commonwealth. Their location in the City of London raises further questions concerning their alliance to the Vatican.
This brings to mind a question. Does Mark Zuckerberg’s visit to Italy indicate he will soon become a Knight of Malta? According to the graphic the intelligence services are subservient to the Jesuit order, so why not appropriate the premier self-selected social surveillance network.
Related: The Top of the Pyramid: The Rothschilds, the Vatican and the British Crown Rule World
Note: Two Crowns? Queen Elizabeth II or Crown Corporation? Why does the Crown corporation have a permanent representative behind the speaker in parliament?
Begs the question who the various “Crown” services serve? Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Private or Public?
Queen Lizzy why do you allow this pretense, this deception? Do you serve as a convenient sleight to deceive the populace into the belief they serve you when in fact they serve aa private corporation?
After Brexit’s turmoil within the political bubble, we see a return to the usual obfuscations.
Theresa May stated, Brexit means Brexit. A meaningless phrase. In our desperation to see the statists acknowledge the dissent of 17.4 million brits, we assumed it was her promise.
However, we begin to wonder about the disconnect between the electorate, party members and the Westminster parliamentarians. Labour, Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and even the Scottish Nationalists leant towards staying in the EU.
Direct questioning of these elected representative is now essential preferably in person. To that end here are some questions to size up their integrity:
- Why do we borrow money with interest from the Bank of England when alternatives like the Bradbury pound exists?
- Why are the allegations of child abuse and satanic ritual abuse not fully investigated and prosecuted? UK Column links and Zurich Insurance Behind Child Sex Abuse Investigation Shutdown?
- If the Queen has no discretion in consenting to statutes passed by the parliament, why do we still need this ceremonial consent?
- Why does the Crown Corporation (City of London) have a permanent unelected “Remembrancer” in the Houses of Parliament?
- Would they resign having lost the backing of their constituency especially in relation to Brexit?
- Will they vote to repeal the European Communities Act 1972?
- Does the existence of the Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 disprove that vaccines are safe?
- The US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been caught twice lying about its data (Swine flu data scrubbed and MMR study distorted). Does the MMR fraud not warrant a criminal prosecution of the officers of Merck, the makers of the MMR vaccine?
- Is it ethical and lawful to impose an agreement like the TTIP, arrived at in secrecy upon the public?
- Is it ethical and lawful to impose a private, corporate court upon a nation state as envisaged in the ISDS?
- Is it ethical or lawful to grant statutory immunity to the Bank of International Settlements, the IMF, Bank of England and the Federal Reserve? Are these bodies above the “law”? Where is the equality before the “law”?
- Are there any rights that cannot be violated by the state? If there are none, then what rights do states claim to protect?
- If the nation state does not serve the common man/woman, whom does it serve and why are we compelled to honour or consent to their interests?
Let’s call them litmus test questions. The MPs squirming, blathering will clearly show their affiliations. 17.4 Million Brexiteers have questions for their local MPs.