Note: It is sadly amusing to watch American legislators and Obama expose their lawlessness even further. It is almost like revisiting an old cowboy movie – the fastest, biggest guns win the day. The FBI, a national agency wants to invade any computer globally? Talk about Russian hackers? The UK passed a similar statute in 2016 called the Investigatory Powers bill. Western cowboys – US, UK and NATO – expose the pretensions for the “rule of law”. Legalistic obfuscation and rhetoric cannot hide their lawlessness. Swaggering western cowboys roam the world.
The binary choice between lesser evils is still evil. We look back at the Hitler era and wonder how the educated and cultured germans fell for the ploys of hitler and co. We watch in real-time the corrupt media in lock step sell the turd of Hillary’s presidency. Trump is labeled anti-establishment whilst he has historical links to zionists, jesuits and even the clintons.
The murderous, psycopathic interests that gave us the false flag of 911 would not be threatented by a Trump presidency. Will the CIA, FBI, TSA, CDC, FCC, Federel reserve, BAR members, Papal knights be investigated or removed? Of course not!
The deceits and criminality are etched into many aspects of American life. Twice now the Federal Bereau of Incompetents has given Hillary the all clear. Banana republics and despots will be looking forward with gleefully cynicism to the utterances of the next US president.
Does your vote not give consent to an evil? Hillary’s continuation of Bush and Obama’s global thuggery and theft. Are Trump supporters aware his property empire is predicated on bankster loan frauds (money out of thin air). Will Trump reject the neocons and corporatists advisors?
Neither side cares for truth, as long as their “lesser evil” candidate wins.
African American have been slavish devotion to the Democratic gang and hence Hillary. Will Trump with his autocratic and corporatists tendencies benefit them? Where is the evidence of this in his coporate hiring and tenancy policies?
Is the binary choice an ethical choice? If the large undecided swung to a third party what would that mean? Does that give the reduced winner of the expected binary choice a mandate? No but it sends a clear signal that enough people have NOT been coralled like texas cattle into the Hillary or Trump camps. After that, they set a blaze of local, state activists fires.
Based on turnout at rallies, Trump has beaten Hillary. Will this popular landslide be enough? It is obvious that a computer voting system is open to fraud even with a paper audit trail. Yet this is deemed acceptable by the statists officials. Imagine a swing to a third party, how will that be massaged? What will the polls say?
Whilst we have been distracted by this farce , Obama allows Dakato land grabs, Isreal continues to blockade Gaza, Ethiopia continues killing Oromo people for their land, Syria’s dismemberment continues, Europe’s self inflicted migrant crisis continues, China and Russian continue to be provoked into another nonsensical war caused by lunatics at the helm of power.
Cowboys and cowgirls, herding the cattle! Obama’s “change” rhetoric is all the evidence you need to see the farce! 2008 was the first black president pasture/gambit/scam/con. Now we have the first woman and an ‘anti-establishment’ pastures.
Published on Jan 25, 2015
2015 EBOLA Update. Curating all things Ebola from the 2014 outbreak to 2015 updates.
Once symptoms appear, an infected person is dangerous to others until the person is quarantined. As the CDC now has been forced to admit, after stupidly denying the obvious fact, the current ebola strain can spread by air. All it takes is a sneeze or a cough or a contaminated surface. link
In other words, it can spread like flu. Previous denials of this fact helped to create
the suspicion that the new ebola strain is a weaponized biowarfare strain created by
US government labs in West Africa. As University of Illinois law professor Francis Boyle has revealed, Washington placed its biowarfare laboratories in African countries that did not sign the convention banning such experimentation. link
It is certainly strange that a government involved in long-term wars in the Middle East, the purpose of which is unclear to the public, and in fomenting conflict with both Russia and China, two countries armed with nuclear weapons, would so recklessly create more suspicions among the public of its motives, intentions, and competence.
This blogger would add that the economic war being waged on Russia will mostly affect the civilian population. This again calls into question the West’s intentions in West Africa. If the US/EU would inflict harm on millions of people in Ukraine/Russia to achieve their goals, can we really trust any displays of altruism or humanitarian aid? I would say an emphatic no!
A stipulation of this contract was that these “schools” had to be within a 2 hour radius of Washington, D.C.As this gentleman was describing the locations of where Dyncorp had subcontracted to various groups like O’Gara, Blackwater, and others, I saw, in my mind’s eye, a perimeter around D.C. Not knowing what to make of this I filed it away in my head.
Apparently that is how the DC-insider crowd saw the elections last week. The elite media were filled with news and opinion pieces on how the election opened the door for the approval of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Pact (TTIP). According to the purveyors of elite opinion this is one of the key areas on which the Republicans in Congress and President Obama can agree.
The turn of the leadership of both parties and the centers of elite opinion to these trade deals shows the incredible contempt they have for the general public and the political process. We just completed lengthy and expensive campaigns where they had ample opportunity to push the case for these deals. Instead we got panicky commercials highlighting everything from the Ebola threat to ISIS beheadings.
TPP and TTIP are everything that people hate about Washington. They are deals being crafted in secret by business interests for business interests. They are never going to be subject to any serious political debate involving the public at large. And the leaders of both political parties are in cahoots on the trade deals and the route for pushing them through Congress.