“The answer to the question of whether Dr. Andrew Wakefield is a hero or an enemy to modern science depends largely on one’s perspective and training. Dr. Wakefield, a practicing British gastroenterologist, dared to publicly question the safety of the MMR vaccination in 1998.
Wakefield observed that his pediatric gastroenterology patients suffered specific inflammatory bowel issues and developed symptoms of autism following the MMR vaccine. Wakefield was not anti-vaccine, but simply recommended single vaccinations as opposed to the combination MMR vaccine, which included three separate vaccinations.”
This blogger asserts that vaccines are not safe or effective. Their continued use in light of our better understanding of human health is due to medical indoctrination, profiteering and population management.
The legal immunity given to vaccine manufacturers is akin to the immunity given to the bankers and their affiliated services.
Very few would defend the banking industry and its affiliates engaged in frauds – mortgage, libor, forex, futures, gold, silver, interests rates, laundering or tax evasion, yet we note the flaccid response of the western prosecutors.
The single exception being Iceland.
It occured to me that the executives on the board of GSK, Pfizer, Sanofi, Merck, Roche might wish to display their confidence in their line of vaccine products.
So here is the challenge:
That each executive member of the board of every vaccine producing pharmaceutical company produce an affidavit stating:
– that every vaccine they produce is safe.
– that every vaccine they produce has been tested.
– that every vaccine they produce is effective.
– that they have NOT seen any adverse effects of their vaccine products.
– that they will accept full commercial liability for the claimed safety of their vaccine product.
Will Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, Soros, Rockfeller, Bloomberg and others put up the funds to support their vaccine pushing friends?
It is safe? Let us see that public declaration under oath from every member of the board.
They can no longer claim ignorance and are directly culpable in any internal frauds committed to hide, obfuscate the truth if their assertions under oath are indeed false.
GSK, Pfizer, Riche, Merck, Astrazeneca, we are waiting…Vaccine Oath/Affidavit Challange!
“Since 29 November, not a single new Ebola case has been reported in Guinea, Sierra Leone, or Liberia. If no new cases pop up, the world will be able to declare on 14 January that the 2-year Ebola epidemic has ended at last, after more than 28,600 cases and 11,300 deaths.
Victory would also mean the end of an unprecedented era in Ebola research. The tragedy offered a unique opportunity: Never before had the disease affected enough people to allow researchers to test Ebola drugs and vaccines in a real-world setting. As the number of cases exploded in mid-2014, they set in motion a vast research program that operated at breakneck speed.
But the harvest of that massive effort is thin.
The biggest success so far is a vaccine produced by Merck. A 31 July report in The Lancet documented remarkable effectiveness in a real-world trial in Guinea. But all other results have yet to appear in the scientific literature. And a careful examination of the data so far—supported by dozens of interviews with the leaders of the studies and other Ebola experts—makes it clear that almost every other trial seems destined to end in questionable results or outright failure. Findings from those that have ended are proving difficult to publish in top-tier journals.”
Note: Personally, “Ebola” was a sickening awakening to the massive global interconnected fraud that is pharma and the vaccine peddling national and supranational bodies.
“…the health board said: “The rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine offered is currently being trialled with the World Health Organisation and has been tested around 7000 people during the recent outbreak of Ebola virus infection in Guinea
“It is an unlicensed vaccine, currently being trialled. “
“There has always been a well deserved suspicion of big- Pharma companies who push new drugs on the public with a flashy ad campaign. The effort employed by Merk, manufacturers of the HPV vaccine Gardasil is a classic example. And it is on-going. So maybe this is a good time to review what’s known about this controversial vaccine and separate the truth from the myth.
If you are a parent of pre-teen children, you are perhaps already struggling with the Gardasil dilemma — not necessarily if you will get them immunized but when. The drug must be administered in three doses over a six month period. It begins to protect against the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) during sexual contact in about six months, so it is usually recommended for teens, sometimes even pre-teens. The lower recommended age limit is 9 years old.”
Thirty years ago, Henry Gadsden, the head of Merck, one of the world’s largest drug companies, told Fortune magazine that he wanted Merck to be more like chewing gum maker Wrigley’s. It had long been his dream to make drugs for healthy people so that Merck could “sell to everyone.” Gadsden’s dream now drives the marketing machinery of the most profitable industry on earth.
None affiliate link.
Note: Amusing video but not as amusing as Monsanto’s PR man Patrick Moore refusing a drink of Glyphosate
Note: Rima, after posting that cultural analysis, I had “cowpox” myself with a booster shot of your factual critique of vaccines.