What is assembling is the first court in history to bring judgment against the Vatican and the Crown of England as institutions. But our Court also signals the dawn of a new notion of justice: one defined by the people themselves, and especially by the historic victims of church and state, to bring about not only a judgment on their persecutors, but a new political and spiritual arrangement to undo the systems responsible for intergenerational crimes against humanity
Two great principles summarize this Natural Law:
1. All things exist and are held in common. By the state of nature, no one has any more of a claim to the earth than another, as noted by a founder of modern law, Thomas Hobbes:
“I demonstrate in the first place, that in the natural state of men (which state we may properly call the state of nature) all men have equal right unto all things” (Leviathan, 1651)
2. The Law does harm to no-one. (Actus Regis Nemini Facit Injuriam) Arising from the Ten Commandments and God’s law to do no harm to one’s neighbour, this principle forms the basis of modern law.
Published on Apr 26, 2014
Explaining the global vaccination programs is NOT a party-killer! It’s a Party Trick!
Hans Rosling, an interesting academic…stating that 83% of children globally receive vaccines. Bill Gates wants to make that 100% with the added benefit this will reduce poverty. WTF! You cannot make this up?
So has poverty been eradicated in US, UK, Greece, Spain, Portugal due to vaccine coverage?
Published on Jan 27, 2015
An update to two reports filed earlier this month. The flu vaccine has claimed another child and the Disneyland measles outbreak is being blamed on the unvaccinated but the system cannot explain away fully vaccinated people coming down with and even spreading the flu. The vaccine hoax is starting fail. Infowars reporter Rob Dew covers this and looks at European studies that our CDC refuses to conduct as it runs cover for big pharma.
This article investigates whether it is possible and recommendable that corporate criminal responsibility should be introduced for international crimes and that the International Criminal Court should therefore have jurisdiction over legal entities
The recurrent question is whether it would have been fair and feasible in those situations to hold the legal entity which these corporate agents were representing criminally responsible as well. The analysis reveals that the answer to this question would undoubtedly have been affirmative
While the complaint has objectively very little chance to lead to the prosecution of anyone, let alone provide remedies for the hundreds of victims of pollution in Ecuador, it sheds light on an interesting and often overlooked aspect of the current international criminal legal system, namely that business people can be prosecuted before the ICC irrespective of the fact that the ICC has no jurisdiction over corporations.
The omission of legal persons from the Rome Statute should not be interpreted as a concerted exercise that reflected a legal view that legal persons are completely beyond the purview of international criminal law. We thus hold that no definitive legal conclusion can be drawn from the exclusion of legal persons from the jurisdiction ratione personae of the ICC. Instead, it is a reflection of the lack of a political (rather than legal) consensus to provide such jurisdiction in the Rome Statute. [para. 66]
Full Post on Rights as Usual
Rights as Usual Home Page
Why do the vaccine pedlars have commercial immunity from producing faulty and dangerous products?
We could say that maybe in 1986 when the National Childhood vaccine injury act was passed, the technology or “science” was lacking. However in 2011, the US supreme court no less chose to uphold the law preventing consumers from suing pharmaceutical companies for damages due to vaccines.
This act contradicts the belief system concerning survival of the fittest/wisest/best. We cannot escape the parallel with the banking sector. Failed businesses (banks) are not allowed to die as the Darwinian belief systems states.
Using ordinary non-cartel business logic, if a medical product should prove dangerous, faulty and unprofitable, it should be withdrawn as the commercial risks will become high.
The fact that the law exists validates and underscores the concern that the industry protects their profits with impunity.
Pharma fraud and banking fraud, the same moral hazard.
The question again, if vaccines are so effective and safe why the indemnity from commercial and criminal liability?
One of the greatest propaganda successes of the consolidated and corporate owned mainstream media in the US. has been the ability to convince many naive Americans that people with fascist tendencies do not exist in our society, and it they do, they certainly don’t occupy the highest halls of power.
In the context of Ebola in West Africa now and any expected (planned) future outbreak, we have heavily edited documentation of the total moral vacuum that exists in western political/military leadership. A mirror of the psychopathy of the banking and corporate elite as exemplified by Glencore, GSK, Eli Lilly and Monsanto.