Tag Archives: Counter-insurgency

Thoughts on the Manchester Bombing of 22nd May 2017

This blogger asserts that the state can use its police, military and intelligence agents to commit false flag terror events. The false flag of 911, that led to the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq being the worst examples of US/Israeli led events.

It is this scepticism that leads this blogger to listen intently for anomalies and unanswered questions concerning what is to my mind another false flag terror event. Why do I assert this already? I look at the prime beneficiaries of this “attack” – the establishment.

New legal rules to impose further free speech controls, further normalisation of military presence on the streets, jingoistic dumbing-down of the population to accept the war narrative that aids further corporate imperial murders abroad.

This is not an apology for ISIS/ISIL/Al-queda but one has to wonder as to the strategic competency of a genuine freedom fighting movement. Is attacking innocents the way to engender sympathy? However if you wish to destroy empathy for a group with genuine grievances what better way than to initiate murderous acts with another look-alike group? This is a simple counter-insurgency tactic .

Once you accept the corruption of national “puppets” and their pretensions concerning the rule of law, murderous global psychopathic activity is expected. Which groups exist outside their national legal announcements and recordings?

Empire builders or globalists are Machiavellian. They have to be. Openly stating their tyrannical goals would destroy it and engender a massive awakening.  Did the British Empire and its corporate vehicle the British East India Company use only principled trade to gain supremacy? Did the American imperial project only use principled and overt methods to grow and maintain its hegemony? If the visible apparatus of state is expected to be duplicitous, what are we to make of its hidden hand – oligarchical royal and financial families?

If you wish to see deceit exemplified in a current puppet, simply look at Donald Trump. He deceived his “roadkill” support base in a collosal manner. He is now a mouth piece for the murderous US imperial NATO project and its oligarchical benefactors.

So we return to the outcome, the narrative, the feeling left after the “atrocity” – antipathy towards Libyans and Muslims. We also note other outcomes:

  • Soldiers on the street, protecting already “hardened” targets – Parliament, 10 Downing street, Buckingham Palace. Was the priority to protect the innocent children and young adults? This nonsense only makes sense as a public relation exercise. It does nothing to ensure the safety of Uk citizens. That the establishment would even request Elizabeth II of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha take part in this charade raises more issues.
  • Normalisation of armed police on UK streets and venues.
  • More controls on information due to its radicalising effect. An increased desire to stupefy the populace.
  • Global calls for social media control similar to China’s. Control (govern) the minds of your plebiscites.

There are also questions which have been raised by some alternative sites. I will post links to these in a later post

The murderou criminal establishment and its order followers wish to impose rules and conducts for which they are exempt. A principled or humane alternative would be to engender higher moral thinking in the populace. The flaw with the latter path is that you engender a population less accepting of deceit and unprincipled conduct in its leadership. Hand in hand with higher moral thought would be a need for better critical thinking.

The beauty or joy to be had from rejecting the deceits of the establishment, is the need to return to fundamentals. Why are we here? What should be the correct conduct between men and women, between individuals, nations, races, the earth? What is an equitable way to share the resources of our common home? What values do we aspire to uphold?How do we measure and store our efforts? What token/currency is equitable? Who or what is sovereign?

These questions expose the West and its asian allies as deeply corrupt states. Why does China harshly repress its citizenry when it is the beneficiary of western technology and financial transfers. Was made in China of US patents accidental? Nope it was policy – globalism. The repression is to prevent exposure of its leadership. Ditto Russia, India, Japan, South Korea.

Ah, the sweet irony. Their tool of surveillance is now facilitating a tremendous exchange of information and awakening. Questioning “their” story, it is indeed a joyous use of our time and effort and a direct nullification of the murderous globalist mindset. What world would you envisage my brothers and sisters? Peace!

 

Would they provoke murder to undermine Brexit?

The EU referendum is not binding on the blue gang. Referendum have been ignored in Ireland and Denmark. However, the act of staying IN the EU is a capitulation. We must not consent.

The stay IN the EU camp ignorantly or deceitfully claim we are better off, sidetracking the issue of sovereignty. Trade, pound in your pocket, money, money seems to be their winning hand.

Freedom, self determination, personal sovereignty are not for sale. Even without war criminal and profound liar Tony Blair, the UK labour party is hostile to the interests of the working class. Brexit has underlined the almost unanimous consensus in Labour to stay in the EU superstate.

The UK voting system is corruptible, especially via postal ballots. Those of us inclined to cynicism or hard realism expected some massaging of the polls and results. However it seems that the surge towards OUT, stated as only 5 to 9 points would make any dubious activity highly risky.

So what are we to make of the opportunism of the “remain” crowd concerning the murder of a UK labour MP outside her office as she left a meeting by  a “loner”. Jo Cox was shot and stabbed by Tommy Mair, as he shouted, “Britain first”? Update: an eyewitness states he heard no such thing.

The daily mail has more details concerning Jo Cox’s murder

Listen to the narrative closely, to what degree is the crime exploited? The criminal mindset that destroyed lives in Iraq. Syria, Libya, Afghanistan would not be averse to initiating a singular crime on UK soil.

Let us forensically observe and listen to the mainstream media, lets see what capital they make of this “lone gunman”.

Executive Outcomes – defunct private military contractor

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Executive_Outcomes

A private military contractor which offered “Security management” and “full-service risk management consulting”. It operated during the 1990s and boasted 500 military advisers and over 3000 military personnel, largely drawn from the South African Civil Cooperation Bureau.

In 1988, Eeben Barlow, a former special forces Lt-Col and commander of South Africa’s Civil Cooperation Bureau (CCB) Europe Branch, was tasked by the apartheid regime’s superspy Major Craig Williamson to carry out the Lockerbie bombing on 21 December 1988 by targeting UN Assistant Secretary-General and Commissioner for Namibia, Bernt Carlsson, the most prominent of Pan Am Flight 103’s 270 victims.
The US and Britain were quick to blame Libya for the sabotage of Pan Am 103, but French President Mitterrand – who had refused permission in 1986 for British-based USAF F-111 aircraft to overfly France in a bombing raid on Tripoli and Benghazi – was not convinced.[1]
By mid-September 1989, the shadowy CCB had morphed into the sinister Executive Outcomes (EO) which became the prototype for the sort of private military company (PMC) that would play such a big part in the conflicts at the end of the twentieth and the beginning of the 21st centuries.[2]

Note: The public narrative concerning the Lockerbie bombing differs from those in the military and intelligence services.