Tag Archives: Bank of England

Unaccountable Bank of International Settlements

Note: We have in the Bank of International Settlements, a body used to hide the transfer of funds from the US and UK to “Nazi” Germany. It cannot be scrutinized by any nation state but holds enormous influence over nations.
In that light India’s demonetization, the drive to cashless economies, demonizing China and Russia, all benefit the financiers and war profiteers.
Oh, almost forgot Bill ‘vaccine pusher’ Gates would love cashless. Does he comprehend the geopolitical deceits? Do you think a billionaire pushing vaccines, over-population, climate change and having direct access to national leaders does not comprehend the deceits? Microsoft was built on deceits!

Advertisements

A new currency: Rice Notes!

The indian statists have decided that some special paper is bad. 500 and 1000 rupees currency paper is no longer an acceptable token of exchange. Billy Gates of B.M.G.F., yes vaccine pusher Billy, agrees that digital money will solve the corruption and poverty of the unbanked. However the indians have identified a local, tangible and life sustaining alternative to e-money that needs no batteries and technology from technocrats like Billy boy Gates.

Rice. Rice as the means of exchanging value. A token of exchange.

Based on this we create an open and public repository of rice of different weights. 1kg, 2kg, 5kg, 0.5kg, 0.25kg. We can exchange rice notes of different weights knowing fully well that it is redeemable for the exact weights in rice.

The public rice repository’s records and physical rice are open to viewing by the public. If a discrepancy should occur between the records and the physical rice, the custodians will face a public penalty for fraud, incompetence and theft! All existing Rice Notes become immediately redeemable and voided for further use.

After the audit, we start again. The rice notes will make it clear to everyone the interchangeable nature of our tokens of exchange and its reliance on honour (trust).

Think the Federal Reserve, IMF, World Bank, B.I.S., Bank of England can compete with this clear as day expression of money as a token of exchange?

Nope, they can’t. The current banksters love their national and supra-national immunities  from public accountability.

Everyone can comprehend Rice Notes. It requries no batteries, no e-wallets, no readers. no phones. The owner is gauranteed the denominated weight in rice, which they can always eat should the need arise.

There is one fly in the ointment though, some dodgy company by the name of Monsanto will demand that Golden rice be accepted into our public rice repository and that it should be valued higher that normal rice due to its Golden colour. We will have to resist this corporate demand even if we are seduced by the golden colour of their rice.

Note: Just in case the BBC or CNN decide this is fake news, I am declaring it is satire, a piss-take of Indian statists and Bill Gates.

Trust and the Concept of Money

If I was diagnosed with an illness, my willingness to accept the diagnosis and treatment would depend on my level of trust of the physician. I would not have surgery, take dangerous medication unless I had confidence in the competency and integrity of the specialist

Imagine a specialist that allows our modern society to avoid barter as our means of exchanging value. We could pick any token for this unit of value: cowry shells, rose petals, salt, ground ivory, bits of metal, or pieces of special paper.
The group that controls that unit of exchange must have the confidence of the population using it. However what happens when that said group is now the source of the injustices in the world?

What makes the situation even more untenable is that this group – let’s call them bankers – have special clubs that refuse to allow public scrutiny. They demand immunity from investigation and also insist on our trust in the control and creation of the units of exchange: dollars, pounds, cowry shells, bits on a screen.
The customers of these bankers that create and manage our units of exchange, begin to wonder how they got so much of it. How did these groups amass so many cowry shells, or bits of metal or even piles of paper? They begin to wonder when this convenient tool of exchange was subverted

If you found a piece of land abundant in cowry shells, shiny stones, bits of yellow metal or could make piles of special paper, you would have a massive “store” of these units of exchange. This would give you a powerful influence in what work was done.

What happens when we see clearly that the cowry shells, piles of paper, shiny stones, byte-coins, bits of metals are just replaceable but convenient tools. We have all agreed to the mind-trap, we can all agree to reject the provenly fraudulent and corrupt “bankster” specialist.

You could focus your “stored” units of exchange on weapons manufacturing, building a militia, funding a priest class to obfuscate reality, surveillance systems, social rules enforced by policy enforcers, etc.

Integrity is therefore key to trust in any unit of exchange. The more intangible the unit of exchange the more integrity matters.
That our units of exchange, money is managed by a corrupt, psycopathic group that is indifferent to social consequences and refuses to submit to social scrutiny is becoming clear to more people. Why are the Federal Reserve and Bank of International Settlements (B.I.S.) immune from lawful and legal scrutiny? Have they not been accomplices in multiple financial deceits and frauds? If they had been rigorous in expunging the blatant frauds, their trust level would be higher.

The banksters, amoral, psychopathic, desire ever increasing units of exchange. What happens when we refuse to accept their scam? What happens when we see clearly that the cowry shells, piles of paper, shiny stones, byte-coins, bits of metals are just replaceable but convenient tools. We have all agreed to the mind-trap, we can all agree to reject the provenly fraudulent and corrupt “bankster” specialist.

What unit of exchange do you believe in? What is in your pocket?

Questions for the “sovereign” parliamentarians

After Brexit’s turmoil within the political bubble, we see a return to the usual obfuscations.
Theresa May stated, Brexit means Brexit. A meaningless phrase. In our desperation to see the statists acknowledge the dissent of 17.4 million brits, we assumed it was her promise.

However, we begin to wonder about the disconnect between the electorate, party members and the Westminster parliamentarians. Labour, Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and even the Scottish Nationalists  leant towards staying in the EU.

Chart showing MPs backing the leave or remain camps

Direct questioning of these elected representative is now essential preferably in person. To that end here are some questions to size up their integrity:

  • Why do we borrow money with interest from the Bank of England when alternatives like the Bradbury pound exists?
  • Why are the allegations of child abuse and satanic ritual abuse not fully investigated and prosecuted? UK Column links and Zurich Insurance Behind Child Sex Abuse Investigation Shutdown?
  • If the Queen has no discretion in consenting to statutes passed by the parliament, why do we still need this ceremonial consent?
  • Why does the Crown Corporation (City of London) have a permanent unelected “Remembrancer” in the Houses of Parliament?
  • Would they resign having lost the backing of their constituency especially in relation to Brexit?
  • Will they vote to repeal the European Communities Act 1972?
  • Does the existence of the Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 disprove that vaccines are safe?
  • The US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been caught twice lying about its data (Swine flu data scrubbed and MMR study distorted). Does the MMR fraud not warrant a criminal prosecution of the officers of Merck, the makers of the MMR vaccine?
  • Is it ethical and lawful to impose an agreement like the TTIP, arrived at in secrecy upon the public?
  • Is it ethical and lawful to impose a private, corporate court upon a nation state as envisaged in the ISDS?
  • Is it ethical or lawful to grant statutory immunity to the Bank of International Settlements, the IMF, Bank of England and the Federal Reserve? Are these bodies above the “law”?  Where is the equality before the “law”?
  • Are there any rights that cannot be violated by the state? If there are none, then what rights do states claim to protect?
  • If the nation state does not serve the common man/woman, whom does it serve and why are we compelled to honour or consent to their interests?

Let’s call them litmus test questions. The MPs squirming, blathering will clearly show their affiliations. 17.4 Million Brexiteers have questions for their local MPs.
Updated:  14/08/2016